Search results

I’m not attacking anyone. The pics are taken from behind the person’s back, from what appears to be several feet away, which gives the appearance of them being candid (whether or not they are). I think it’s pretty strange to get so defensive.

If you mean the ones posted on 10/23, those look like candid pics of an unsuspecting person, whether they are or not. Just FYI in case you don’t realize. Stay safe.

I think it sends a message that the behavior’s okay, and I don’t think it is. I think it’s disrespectful, and that it’s right to discourage it (yes, even on a fetish site). You could disagree, and I guess that’d be the impasse. What you’re ‘missing‘ from what I can tell is that we’re in a social...

It looks like these pics were posed for, not candid shots of unsuspecting women’s feet.

Did you ask them?

chicago is a legend <3

Could you provide clarification about how you came to learn she “absolutely hates tickling”? Like, did you tickle her and then she told you? Did she just confide in you more out of the blue about how someone groped her and now “she hates tickling because she associates it with her traumatic...

Females imo. I could get into the reasons, but I think you probably know already. I know it’s an apples/oranges thing for people, though.

Quickly? Yeah, 8 pages deep. Love Ron though *thumbs up*

Do you think there’s a difference between murder and manslaughter?

The OPs scenario isn't one of them merely having a tickle fetish. It's of knowing what that means for them: that tickling their female friends is 'obtaining arousal or sexual gratification without their knowledge or ability to willingly consent.' To the tickler, they are 'touching someone in a...

You mean you disagree that copping a feel is unethical, or you disagree that the OPs scenario is tantamount to that?

Well then you’re wrong. Try re-reading what I wrote maybe. I’m saying you are the one who’s deflecting to the idea of being “ethically obligated to share your sexual thoughts”. Never said it was their business that you have a boner. I know there's a risk of people being turned on by doing...

Not sure if you understand what an analogy is, but I see it again... If you aren't going to see it, though, then I guess you just won't. Anyway, sure, I imagined what you said. It just seems like a deflection, though, because whether or not someone is ethically obligated to divulge their...

I didn’t assume anything. The OP states: “For me, consciousness of the sexual nature of my fetish makes tickling random female friends unethical because it is obtaining arousal or sexual gratification without their knowledge or ability to willingly consent. Instead of passing a Level One...

So, are the LEGO set and the Amazon product analogous to the female friends?

No, I don’t think I missed anything. I wasn’t talking about seeking unsuspecting people to tickle. I meant what I said..the person is seeking sexual gratification by tickling an unsuspecting person. And that can include a friend. If what appears to be a “playful poke” was actually the tickler...

Seeking sexual gratification by tickling an unsuspecting person is unethical in my view, yes. It’s essentially a ‘copped feel’ hiding in plain sight.

What if the person’s only facial hair is a mustache?.

Hm, any gratification out of her touching you with her feet? Maybe run that idea by her. You do obviously need to respect her boundaries, though.