The TMF is sponsored by:
LOL, I'm always relaxed. And I understand if you can't answer the questions I posed. After all, it's just a forum, like you said.
Third, consent regardless of gender or any assumptions about situation.
I think not. When society collectively draws lines and boundaries, they are documented legally and become law. Where there is no law, there is no boundary.
Obviously, this is simply your opinion, and one that some of us obviously don't share.
Do you tell every girl with whom you slow dance that you dig the feel of her breasts pressing against you, or how you love having your hand on the top of her butt? Of course not. You simply smile and maintain your cover story of just enjoying the dance.
That's interesting, because I see two entirely different schools of thought being played out here. First, we have a few frank and honest guys who have enough self confidence to seek many and varied avenues to meet their tickling needs and talk about the different ways they go about it. Then you have the lonely guys with no tickling in their real lives who hang out on the TMF waiting for the first opportunity to ingratiate themselves to the women by attempting to throw their more imaginative brothers under the bus, saying, "Look at me, ladies. I'm SENSITIVE! I would never do THAT!"
Rather than to follow their own hearts and minds, the lonely guys are perfectly willing to milquetoast their way into the good graces of the ladies by challenging their more imaginative brothers in a facade of gallantry.
Right on, brother! Props to you for doing it your way!
Obviously, it is opinion that is shared by the majority of society. Obviously, it is not an opinion shared by creepy guys, but then again they are creepos, so who gives a rat's ass.
That's because not everybody agrees on what is socially unacceptable. Hence, my statement stands: Where there is no law, there is no established boundary.
Obviously, you're in no position to speak for the majority of society. Obviously, this is a textbook example of the logical fallacy known as argumentum ad populum.
"Creepos." Yep, that's the word the ignorant use to demonize those who engage in sexual or voyeuristic practices they find unpalatable. For example, there are many who would describe people who tickle others for sexual fulfillment as creepos. I've shown some of the crueler tickling videos to people and that's the very word they use to describe anybody who gets off on seeing a woman being tortured, consensually or not.
I don't recall specifying "these days." But the fact that you dodged the question (however clumsily) serves to amplify my point. Thank you.
So essentially you're saying that to enter a nail salon with a hidden agenda to check out women out is creepy, but it's okay to check them out if you already happen to be there for reasons you consider to be legitimate. I'm curious. Do you just make this stuff up as you go along, because you are rapidly painting yourself into a corner here.
Thanks, man. Yeah, this is not my first rodeo with the Morality Police. Used to be once upon a time, the community was closer knit, open to different ways and means of bringing more tickling into our lives. People could share strategies, ask for advice on how to coerce a girl into a ticklish situation, and without all the intolerant bigotry that pervades every thread of this type today.
