6empty6empty6
Registered User
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2018
- Messages
- 1
- Points
- 0
Cccc
Last edited:
People who have a nut allergy require extra sympathy from people who don't have a nut allergy. Same logic. And how is it dehumanising unless you're saying men and women who are not ticklish are not human? I'm saying they are human and they helped me out whether they intended to or not. Either way, this is just a philosophical way of looking at things. It's like saying don't go out of your way to find someone who is ticklish, because being ticklish can be a choice for some people. If you find someone who cares they'll choose to be ticklish for you even if they're not naturally ticklish. Therefore being ticklish doesn't matter because it's a trait you can cause yourself to have. If a non ticklish male or female showed interest in me in the past I probably would have rejected them, but now I'd give them a chance but I'd ask then if theyre willing to be ticklish for me. That's my test, if they says yes I know they're capable of sympathy if they says no then I'll find someone else or just be alone. In a way I think a non ticklish person is better for a ler, because being tickled is less likely to bother them, so they're more likely to be willing to be tickled on a more frequent basis, therefore is more fun for someone like me to be around. Either way, this is turning into a pretty stupid conversation at this point. TBH If I am wrong I'm making myself look like an idiot and I apologise if anyone took offense because none was intended. Reality is a crazy thing, can't blame me for saying something crazy on occasion.
No I'm not trolling I've been here before I just don't usually post I'm not much of an author. I just thought this would be an interesting this to discuss here cos I couldn't see anyone else discussing this topic. I do believe it genuinely to be true but I'll admit its possible that I'm wrong. It's just an interesting thought to me, if it's wrong then just have fun lolling at my misconception, if it's true it's cool cos I was smart enough to figure it out, if it's false then at least it's pretty funny that I'm so convinced it is true. It's a win, win situation either way. I think outside the box that the box is in.
People who have a nut allergy require extra sympathy from people who don't have a nut allergy. Same logic. And how is it dehumanising unless you're saying men and women who are not ticklish are not human? I'm saying they are human and they helped me out whether they intended to or not. Either way, this is just a philosophical way of looking at things. It's like saying don't go out of your way to find someone who is ticklish, because being ticklish can be a choice for some people. If you find someone who cares they'll choose to be ticklish for you even if they're not naturally ticklish. Therefore being ticklish doesn't matter because it's a trait you can cause yourself to have. If a non ticklish male or female showed interest in me in the past I probably would have rejected them, but now I'd give them a chance but I'd ask then if theyre willing to be ticklish for me. That's my test, if they says yes I know they're capable of sympathy if they says no then I'll find someone else or just be alone. In a way I think a non ticklish person is better for a ler, because being tickled is less likely to bother them, so they're more likely to be willing to be tickled on a more frequent basis, therefore is more fun for someone like me to be around. Either way, this is turning into a pretty stupid conversation at this point. TBH If I am wrong I'm making myself look like an idiot and I apologise if anyone took offense because none was intended. Reality is a crazy thing, can't blame me for saying something crazy on occasion.