If it's true, what a black eye for the community.
It takes all kinds! Hope he's convicted and sent to prison so he can feel what it's like to be raped! Asshole!
The drugging-and-raping community?
Because what he did has nothing to do with this site or the people on it.
The drugging-and-raping community?
Because what he did has nothing to do with this site or the people on it.
If it's true, what a black eye for the community.
Tell me, how did the New York Post title their article; or did you miss the part where it mentions, "interview for foot fetish website."
Now what community might you know of that might have foot fetishists in it???
And what is the correlation the general public is going to make when they read it?
Basically this is tantamount to when someone of the Islamic faith commits an act of terror. Even though that one act does not define the community, they still garner a bad reputation as a result. With this article mentioning that this happened during an interview for a foot fetish website, it can't possibly be a good look for the rest of the foot fetish community.
Disgraceful.
I hope he is found guilty, and sent to jail for a long time.
Unpopular opinion: the man may be innocent. If he did it, he deserves all these accusations and everything that's coming his way. But what if he's innocent? Innocent people do get wrongfully accused.
Again, not saying that he's innocent or guilty, but let's not hang him until he's proven guilty or at least his side is heard.
Unpopular opinion: the man may be innocent. If he did it, he deserves all these accusations and everything that's coming his way. But what if he's innocent? Innocent people do get wrongfully accused.
Again, not saying that he's innocent or guilty, but let's not hang him until he's proven guilty or at least his side is heard.
Well, according to the article you posted, she went to the hospital for a rape kit, and then the police arrested him.
Have rape kits (the results) become that fast? If so thats amazing.
What do you mean?
There either were or were not bodily fluids present that would indicate a rape, no?
Do you mean DNA evidence? I doubt they have that, but I would assume that the police can connect the dots from "Yes, this woman who says she was raped has semen in her body," to "She just came out of this hotel, where she told the front desk clerk she'd been raped by the man in room XXX," to "We should probably arrest the man in XXX."
Or am I missing something?
Edit: Also I think rape kit technicians look for and photograph other visible signs of abuse, like abrasions or physical signs of a struggle. The results of which would also, presumably, be instantaneous.
Edit: Also I think rape kit technicians look for and photograph other visible signs of abuse, like abrasions or physical signs of a struggle. The results of which would also, presumably, be instantaneous.