-
The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us. -
>>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
Don't forget to include your username
The TMF is sponsored by:
Ticklish in "tickling" clips but not ticklish in "foot worship" clips?
- Thread starter NY ler
- Start date
It's not a foreign concept to me at all. I am aware that some producers will ask models to fake their reactions and fakey clips do get made - often deliberately, in order to meet customer demands/expectations. However, you are trying to apply this idea to all tickling clips that don't fit the pre-conceived notions you have in your head regarding how a person should react under certain circumstances. That is simply wrong.
As for apples and oranges, I'm giving you a valid analogy here. It illustrates how people can (and do) react differently to exactly the same stimulus/sensation depending on other factors - something that you keep denying is possible.
Comfort Eagle
Level of Cherry Feather
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2003
- Messages
- 10,217
- Points
- 48
While I'm not going to set off a tantrum by implying it never happens, you can decrease ticklishness of feet by massaging them first. On the off-chance that not every model is a gold digging wench out to scam good and decent ticklefuckers with fake porn, it stands to reason they would try and do something to decrease sensitivity on their toes if they're doing a video that doesn't require tickling.
Um, can you be a little more original in your response to me than using my words? Shows a lack of creativity. Then again, kind of explains your entire stance in this pointless thread.
The problem with you is that you are implying that is is IMPOSSIBLE for things to be the way they are. Like there is just no way in the world that a particular model can be ticklish in one clip, but not ticklish in another such as foot worshipping. What is obviously going over your head is that it IS possible. People have given examples of this phenomenon. We have told you that factors come into play and as I have said:
THERE IS NO ONE SIZE FITS ALL WHEN IT COMES TO TICKLING.
Did you ever think that after being tickled, a person can lose sensitivity? You have no idea when they filmed these clips. You are not in the studio behind the scenes. How do you know that a tickle clip didn't happen first and after the clip, time passed in the same day and when it came time for the worship clip, it felt different for them. Human physiology dude. You look at things in an absolute way. Guess what, not everything on the human body works in an absolute way. Which is what we have tried to explain to you over and over.
Marinate on that...please don't copy my words again. Makes you look....
Non-creative...
Both of them dressed in costume and tickle fight?
I’m also on DeviantArt
https://www.deviantart.com/storyteller678
TMF Together 2019 [emoji486]
"THERE IS NO ONE SIZE FITS ALL WHEN IT COMES TO TICKLING" - when did I say that my example is absolute; applicable in ALL situations?
Your argument is ridiculous because you are saying that it is NEVER applicable.
Marinate on that.
Your argument is ridiculous because you are saying that it is NEVER applicable.
Marinate on that.
magic fingers
3rd Level Yellow Feather
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2001
- Messages
- 3,712
- Points
- 38
Every woman's reaction is different because every woman is different.
I've known women who were hyper ticklish when I just touch their soles, yet licking, or toe sucking has zero effect.
My own feet are hyper ticklish, but on the few occasions where a woman is brave enough to suck my toes, it doesn't tickle. Now if she goes between the toes, or right below the toes, I practically hit the ceiling.
I've known women who were hyper ticklish when I just touch their soles, yet licking, or toe sucking has zero effect.
My own feet are hyper ticklish, but on the few occasions where a woman is brave enough to suck my toes, it doesn't tickle. Now if she goes between the toes, or right below the toes, I practically hit the ceiling.
lol You know what is hilarious about you? You have tunnel vision. Kind of sad, yet entertaining.
Read your own posts dude. You started this entire thread based on your preconceived ideas about if someone is ticklish or not. When others have said it IS possible for a model to be able to be ticklish in one clip and not ticklish in another, what was your response? If you were not thinking ALL you would never reply the way you have. The thread would be over because you understand that concept. But nope, here we are on page 3 with you still replying to your actual premise which is implying that ALL are like this. Need I remind you of this post by YOU?
If she's not ticklish during toe sucking in a foot worship clip....
But she's "ticklish" during THE SAME toe sucking in a tickling clip...
Then she's not ticklish and she played you.
These are you words right? Go back and you can see you wrote them. Now, if you understood the concept that not ALL women are like this, why would you say people got played? We all understand that some models fake their laughter. No shock there. But we are on page 3 of a thread. No one would even respond to this dumpster fire if it was acknowledged that some women can actually be not ticklish during toe sucking in a foot worship clip but she is ticklish during the same toe suck in another clip was a possibility. But your own words are implying that is it all because the woman "played" us.
Do you even know your own argument anymore? No one is arguing that there are NO fake tickling clips. So what is your entire point if you understand that it is a possibility that people react differently? Make it make sense.
"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
What? When did I say that my example is applicable in ALL situations??? There is a phrase about making ASSumptions.
And for the record, you are not saying that women NEVER fake ticklishness in clips, right? If not, isn't what I suggested in my OP a good "tell" to spot fakers?
Again, not always, as nothing is ever absolute.
I am going to help you understand your own words ok? I feel like being helpful to people who can't comprehend.
Here is your exact words in post 15 of this thread.
Guess what....
If a model does not break a smile while having her toes sucked in a foot worship video...
But laughs hysterically while getting the same toes sucked in a tickling video...
Then she is not ticklish and you (a buyer of the tickling clip) are getting played.
That is your exact words right? Now, in post 17 of this thread (I took out MY WORDS that you reused because you don't have any good comebacks...):
If she's not ticklish during toe sucking in a foot worship clip....
But she's "ticklish" during THE SAME toe sucking in a tickling clip...
Then she's not ticklish and she played you.
Again, these are your words right? Now, kindly explain to everyone who decided to read this thread how in both of those posts, it does not show you are referring to ALL? The words you use does not give room for an interpretation of "some" models. The words you used are in the terms of being absolute.
Seriously, read your own words. You did not write "If SOME Models" or give any indication that it applies to certain people, then anyone who comprehends the English language can deduce you are using absolute terms. Why else would we spend 3 pages telling you models can have different reactions in the same moment? We wouldn't be wasting our time telling you this if it was about your frustration with SOME models. Your entire tone is about ALL. This should be common sense but then we have this thread...
PS and I say this with me sighing heavily and shaking my head because you have trouble comprehending things, when I say:
No one is arguing that there are NO fake tickling clips.
That means I am saying that women can produce fake ticklishness. I am part of the "no one" group. If I wasn't then I couldn't write "No one". Again, common sense...
And no, what you suggested is NOT a good way to tell because again, people can have different reactions in different situations. Based on people's experiences, we can shoot holes all through your theory. Which is why we are having this conversation...
No, not poor me, it reflects poorly on you. You now realized you screwed up and trying to backtrack. It's all good. It is good to see you learned from your mistakes. Now, what was the point of you starting this thread again? You are going to stop your complaining now and just watch tickle clips and not pester us with baseless drivel?
The community appreciates it. Merry Christmas!
"Now, what was the point of you starting this thread again?"
Here you go:
Anyone else finds it annoying and disingenuous seeing a model flip out laughing hysterically during a tickling clip, yet the SAME MODEL showing no reaction in a foot worship clip, which should certainly tickle, if she was as ticklish as she portrayed to be in the aforementioned tickling clip?
PS "The community appreciates it." - are you like a spokesman for the "community"? I must have missed the memo.
Here you go:
Anyone else finds it annoying and disingenuous seeing a model flip out laughing hysterically during a tickling clip, yet the SAME MODEL showing no reaction in a foot worship clip, which should certainly tickle, if she was as ticklish as she portrayed to be in the aforementioned tickling clip?
PS "The community appreciates it." - are you like a spokesman for the "community"? I must have missed the memo.
lol
Dude, you have no idea what point you are trying to make anymore do you? Let's recap:
You started a ridiculous thread complaining about the fact that a model is ticklish in one clip, then not ticklish in another. Then when other people are telling you that is possible, you come back full force saying the model is a fake because she should always be ticklish. Remember, these are your EXACT words:
If she's not ticklish during toe sucking in a foot worship clip....
But she's "ticklish" during THE SAME toe sucking in a tickling clip...
Then she's not ticklish and she played you.
You are arguing that a person that is ticklish in one clip, but not the other when the same physical touch is applied is faking. That is an absolute statement by you. Read your words.
Now, you tried to come back from that with a "I know it s not all models..." excuse, but then isn't it totally possible that what you are complaining about just one of those times where a model can in fact be ticklish in one, but not the other? How can you say a model is being "disingenuous" if 1) you don't know the model personally 2) you are not there at the studio to actually confirm this and 3) that model could be some of the people on this planet that can be ticklish and not ticklish later?
Like I said, you really need to refine your argument. Why do you think people who are not supporting your OP are telling you it IS possible for this to happen? But your response is not "Yeah, I know, but if they really are then that sucks", it is a matter of fact, absolute scenario of:
If she's not ticklish during toe sucking in a foot worship clip....
But she's "ticklish" during THE SAME toe sucking in a tickling clip...
Then she's not ticklish and she played you.
Comprehend yet?
And yes I speak for the community when it comes to people like you complaining about something that you can't even prove.....
Seems impossible to have rational conversations with skeptics and "tickle experts". Not too long ago there was a thread where a person thought Natalya Neidhart was faking when her sister was tickling her feet. Natalya Neidhart; Professional Wrestler/Non-Tickle Model. There was also a thread where people thought a woman on a game show wasn't ticklish on her feet simply because she didn't laugh while having a dog lick them. These types have a hard time excepting that not every single thing ever is going to tickle a ticklish woman, and when they do see ticklish reaction then it's cleary fake.
Comfort Eagle
Level of Cherry Feather
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2003
- Messages
- 10,217
- Points
- 48
A lot of these people seem absolutely convinced that everyone is just fucking with them and deliberately trying to make themselves look not-ticklish. The fact that a mainstream, completely non-fetish wrestler would fake a mainstream not intended for jerkoff purposes seems entirely in the realm of possibility for them.
This is all you got?
You didn't get the memo that I was delegated to speak for the community against folks like you who have a very narrow minded view of the world of tickling? Sucks for you. It was a pretty funny memo too as we were so stunned that someone like you couldn't comprehend the many diverse reactions to being tickled. Look around in this thread. There are many people telling you the same thing. Pay attention.
100% agree. There are people who are so narrow minded in their views that they can't comprehend that people react different. There is no one size fits all when it comes to tickling.
I am sure that anyone who calls themselves an "expert" in tickling, is only that in their own small little world.
