toneus79 said:
Well Princess in order to make it up you can cut out all the mock hurt for not being addressed properly by your official royal title, and your supporters can just shut up period.
It is not mock hurt. In fact, I'm not hurt at all. I actually think you have made some very valid points after stripping away the negative tone in which you package your comments. I just don't expect my name, or my statements to be mocked as I am showing you respect when I address you. All I would say, is address me without mocking and your comments will be listened to objectively and I will address you in return with nothing but respect.
toneus79 said:
The bottom line is I have no problem with what anyone wants to look at. However (stating this again as someone who has been on this forum since its inception) this is the Tickling Media Forum. Therefore the convention around here, is if you are mixing in material with tickling whether that is: oral sex, spanking, hard core bondage, nudity (for some people read male nudity), mention it rather than just saying here is a link for some intense tickling. Therefore if someone finds some aspect of sexuality offensive (for instance I find male ejaculation offensive, which a recent producer decided to throw into his 'Tickling' sample clip, but didn't think to mention), they would know not to go there. Not a lot to ask surely, after all this would not be a potential customer you only needed to convert.
Valid point, one which I have listened to constructively, and one that will govern the descriptions I use on this forum in future. As stated previously, the last thing I wish to do on this forum is to upset or to offend. I'm sorry if I did so.
toneus79 said:
I am not out to upset you for the sake of it, as I like Asian Tickling, and the brief pictures of yours that I saw, the girls looked attactive and fun. However I know what I personally do and don't like.
When it started to become apparent in the late Eighties/ early Nineties that there was a market for tickling material, a lot of mainstream pornographers tried to come up with material. They largely failed because they couldn't move away from their genitalia/shagging obsession. The reason why people like MTP Jeff and TC Videos took the market from them and became so big, is because they understood that tickling fetishists were purely interested in the tickling/laughter aspects and thus didn't include any of the mainstream porno elements.
While its true that sexual activities mixed in with tickling could be described as "mainstream porno" elements, the fact is, many of us actually desire that material and find it very appealing. To experience sex whilst laughing is something that many of us really enjoy, I know I do. The laughter hightens the sexual pleasure. Although admitedly, a true tickling experience without sex is also very rewarding, just in a different way.
toneus79 said:
If you take my advice (which I am sure you won't) tickle those pretty Asian girls, and leave out all the other sexual aspects, otherwise you will have a very small customer base.
I will take parts of your advice, but I certainly will not change my mixture of sexual content and tickling on the back of what just you have said when so many others clearly like it. I will say though, that I will also cater more closely to you, and many people like you that do not wish to see sexual activities mixed in with tickling.
My tickling sessions are real, I won't say 'more' real than other producers, but certainly as real as you can get and I truly believe that my content does not 'need' sexual activity to be desirable to all us ticklephiles. Stay tuned and you will see a totally contrasting style coming from my company.