• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Teams That Looked Great On Paper, And Turned Out To Be Awful

Mitchell

Level of Coral Feather
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
33,515
Points
48
My Braves lost their 10th game in a row last night, further confounding their fans, and pushing them deeper into the cellar. When one examines this team, with the Jones Boys, Smoltz, Hudson, Francouer, and others, there is no way they should be this bad. At the very least, they should be over 500, and at least contending for the wild card, instead of going deeper into last place every day, with no hope for the season.
This being said, all baseball fans know that there have been plenty of times when a team looked good on paper, and was terrible on the field. One such team that came to mind this morning was the 1992 New York Mets. Most baseball fans probably remember them. There was a book written about them called "The Worst Team Money Could Buy". At the time, after losing Darryl Strawberry to free agency, and collapsing under 500 to end 1991, the Mets whipped out their checkbook, and spent $44 million, a huge sum in 1992, to acquire sluggers Eddie Murray and Bobby Bonilla via free agency, as well as trade for pitcher Bret Saberhagen. At the time, with the Mets in the East, and Atlanta in the West, I thought to myself, as did many baseball fans I am sure:" Good moves, Mets, Braves will probably be seeing you in the playoffs" Wrong! Just the opposite happened. Instead of winning the East, the Mets were awful all summer, even with Dwight Gooden, Bret Saberhagen, and David Cone, ( for most of the season, until he was traded to Toronto in August for Jeff Kent) on the pitching staff. As it turned out, the Mets hit only .235 as a team that year, with but 93 home runs, and finished with 90 losses, showing that $44 million got them absolutely nothing but a fifth place finish, an awful team, and very few fans to support them, as only 1.7 million came into Shea that year.
While the Braves have a tight budget, and by no means have ever whipped out the checkbook in recent years to sign anyone, except for Tim Hudson two winters ago, after his trade from Oakland, this Atlanta team reminds me of that Mets team in 1992, a team that should have been at least decent to good on paper, which has turned out to be a stinker. If they do not turn things around, and finish last, the 2006 Braves might well be one of baseball's most disappointing teams in history, considering their talent.
Anyhow, watching the Braves situation this year, just made me think of that New York Mets team in 1992. Does anyone else remember any teams or specfic years where a certain team was supposed to be good, and then was terrible? Let's talk about it.

Mitch
 
Just look at the Oakland Raiders, on paper they could beat anyone but just look what happened after losing the Superbowl.

Kust
 
The 1979-1981 Montréal Expos, and, more painfully for me, the 1990-1994 Buffalo Bills, at least when they got to the Super Bowl. :sadcry:
 
The 1981 Expos weren't awful. They got the the 5th game of the NLCS when it was best-of-5, and might have gotten to the World Series that year but for Rick Monday's homerun.
 
Mitch, much wailing and gnashing of teeth! 15 division titles in a row, 13 or so when the competition in the rest of the division was negligable...I mean, you know...

No team in professional sports over the past ten years (with the surprising exception of THIS one) has had more financial wherewithal than the New York Rangers. Living proof that money can't buy you love. According to the brain-dead conventional wisdom, with the kind of financial backing the Rangers have had, they should've won seven out of the last ten Stanley Cups...
 
milagros317 said:
The 1981 Expos weren't awful. They got the the 5th game of the NLCS when it was best-of-5, and might have gotten to the World Series that year but for Rick Monday's homerun.
You're right, of course. I made the mistake of not distinguishing between a team that doesn't live up to its expectations and one that is simply the victim of the roll of the dice. The '94 Expos are another example, cruising through the regular season with the best record in the majors only to have their season halted by the player's strike, dashing their best chance since 1981 to make it to the World Series. Even the 1990 Buffalo Bills whom I originally mentioned could have gone down as one of the best teams ever--and the momentum might have carried them to better showings in their subsequent Super Bowl appearances--had Scott Norwood's field goal attempt drifted just a little more to the left in the '91 game. A moment we Bills fans will never get over. :cry1:
 
What's New
5/15/25
The TMF Welcome Forum has a place for you to say hello to us!
Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad11701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top