Recent content by Soles_Scream

I'd definitely say be more direct with what you want. "I need to be tickled now" type of blunt as you mentioned. Does he have any sexual interests or needs that you're aware of that you don't currently partake in? Perhaps you all discussed that already. Again, don't mean to be invasive, I'm just...

How specific has your communication with your husband been regarding your desire to be tickled? Also, do you know what his wants are or where he's at with the relationship? I don't mean to sound cold, definitely not my intention. I'm just trying to figure out the bases to better give you...

People are stupid enough to try things that they did not discuss beforehand or were even told not to do. I took the post at face value and responded. Nothing about that sounded consensual in the slightest. If done as described in the OP, that model would probably stick it out to get paid, but...

Pretty much all but a few models that I tickle have been ticklish there to a good degree.

"bondage models being tickled unexpectedly" implies that it was not discussed prior to. Then the OP wrote this "whether bondage models who did not decide to have tickle sessions were tickled anyway for as long as it lasted" What about that seems consensual to you?

I know this is a fantasy scenario, but a few producers pulled this crap and it is a BS move. Keep that s*** in the realm of fantasy. Freaking triggered because people pull that crap without discussion and sometimes knowing that tickling is a limit for the model.

I'm going to shoot a scene like this because I've always wanted to. Consent having been granted of course.

Ginary is the producer

Thank you, I will try to filter it out.

I wish DeviantArt would do something similar to what the TMF has done. If you tell Gronk or some LLM to make something which steals from other sources to make it, at least separate those works from the art that takes some actual practiced skill and care to put together.

Most people outside of the kink do not think about [insert your kink or fetish here].

If the content looks real enough, it can run into the same issues as content made with real people as it pertains to compliance. Especially if this content is to be monetized or sold through normal channels. The second potential issue is legal if the depictions resemble a real person’s likeness...

I'd love to hear your thoughts, especially from people who do not shoot content. Do you think there's any difference between paid sessions (not recorded for sale) and paid content shoots (recorded for sale)? You can talk about the difference between free consensual play and paid content shoots...

Riot Starter is incredibly ticklish! One of the models I wish I had sessioned with before becoming a producer

Clips are being removed due to either compliance or documentation reasons. It's a result of Mastercard/Visa rules and legislation and Age Verification laws.