• The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

The TMF is sponsored by:

Clips4Sale Banner

QUESTION ABOUT TICKLE SLAVES COMPANY/TICKLING PARADISE

W

wildcatgrl

TMF Regular
Joined
Dec 20, 2009
Messages
156
Points
0
Hello,

I just got finished watching the Jessica video from tickleslaves (now part of tickling paradise). The video features a lee who supposedly does not know she will be part of a tickling video and begs for it to stop. This goes on for 33 minutes and she seemed pretty desperate at the end.

My question is does anyone know if this was acting or did she actually not know she was gonna be a part of it? At several times during the vid, she threatens to get him into trouble after the vid. My point is that if it was acting, she probably would not have said the type of things she did.

Just curious.
 
There has been discussions as to whether or not they are legitimately non-consensual.

Personally, I look at it like this. If it was truly not scripted at least one of those women would have gone to the police. Even if they signed a contract the police would've shut that business down at least temporarily while they investigated.

Nothing like that has ever happened to my knowledge with either TS or TP. So I chalk it up to playacting.
 
Yeah, this is periodically a concern when people see some vids. Honestly I'm sure it's just for show.
 
If you were moved by that performance, then be sure to check out “Miranda” by the same producer. It is "the" quintessential masterpiece of the non-con tickle genera and should be required viewing by all tickle content producers.
 
Thanks guys. It seemed very genuine when I watched it so it was great acting if it was indeed for show. I have watched parts of the Miranda one but I dont think she was as desperate as Jessica. The thing with Jessica is it seemed almost like a real-life capture of a captive and tickling them for info or out of some type of revenge.

I really hope it was just for show because if it was not, that guy probably narrowly avoided charges.
 
wildcatgrl said:
I really hope it was just for show because if it was not, that guy probably narrowly avoided charges.
Click to expand...
Actually those are only two of five or six that Jerry (KosPro) did, and he was forced to flee California for just that reason … :firedevil
 
wildcatgrl said:
im confused....why was he forced to flee? because they were not consensual??
Click to expand...
My guess would be he decided to let the lawyers quibble over what the definition of “is” is in his release contracts, while he watched from a rather distant vantage point.
 
I'm disturbed about Tickle Slaves since the 13th Amendment outlawed slavery. This concerns me deeply!
 
my opinion, it was a planned trick. they knew they would be tied and dominated even may have known there might be a lil tickling but all were surprised and tricked by what happened. just a guess but some things were said that made it seem they were kinda close (professionally) to the guy yet surprised by what was happening. genuine non-con none the less. if that is acting then awards are due, they seem clearly uncomfortable and if he really did disappear then there prob is a reason. seems a little sick if true.
 
wildcatgrl said:
so you are saying that it was actually non-consensual and not acting?
Click to expand...
I guess that depends on your definition of “consensual”. If the release stipulates bondage with non-sexual contact (i.e. no penetration or direct genital contact), but never mentions the word “tickling”, is it consensual or not?

And remember, legally speaking, you need to view these terms through the lens of typical vanilla public interpretation, and not that of TMF sanctioned protocol.
 
is that what happened? he said non-sexual contact on his forms?

still, if that is the case, he went on for 33 minutes in the jessica video. by the end, she was clearly pissed so if she did not know what to expect, i think the decent thing to do would have been to stop after far less time.

i guess it still makes for great viewing for some ppl but I hope shes not traumatized after the expereince.
 
It’s always best to seek legal advice from those with expertise in this particular area prior to signing any release to insure all “details” are adequately defined upfront.
 
I can't speak for any of the other models, but I own "Katy" (the video, not the model :D ) and in my opinion, it was a badly-staged joke. When the tickling starts she says in this dorky mock-surprise tone, "oh my God, someone's tickling my feet!"

Yeah. I hear that from people all the time. :rolleyes:
 
I am a non consentual 'lee challenged 'ler...................

TP also did their on "non-con" videos. Supposedly the "escort" was tickled against her will( and feet...). In these as well as the Kospro videos, we do not know exactly what modeling services were contracted for or for what period of time. Was some tickling allowed but went too far? Those videos I have seen make it appear the girl was prepared for bondage, but no tickling. This saying the tickling was non con of course could have been staged as the whole plot of the video. The girls did seem to be upset, but it could be acting. I would think the police would be called in if a restrained and tickled without permission scenario went down.
 
I reallyt doubt T.S. was trully non-con. It's possible.... but is it likely?

The non-con that Tickle Paradise did.... the woman appears under a different name in one of their auditions. She knew what they did. They mnay have just pushed her further than usual but I also assume that she agreed to it, or got well paid for it. other companies have taken ther models further than 'the usual'.
 
If they tricked vanillas into real torture... Too much doubt here.

I'm sure there's a link to threads with more information but -- I'll repeat...

I heard the creep from TickleSlaves *was brought up on charges, but I haven't seen evidence, if I remember correctly, the friend who mentioned it couldn't find it
(I'm just hoping that's true, if he/they did it, but then Tickling Paradise is criminal for continuing to sell it... regardless of whether or not they did the same thing...).

The fact that it appears that these creeps may really have tortured & traumatized people is slimy enough, nothing like promoting "real" abuse...

...but if they actually did it :facepalm: --- I'd really hope those women weren't too embarrassed (or legally unable?!?!) to bring charges --- I'd think they could, if they could find the videos online...

If someone tried that crap with me and I found I couldn't press charges because of some inadequate wording... :devilish: There's no question, I'd find them again....

Obviously it's torture if prolonged or if (the victim didn't understand how extreme tickling can be, or even expect it to begin) -- Vanillas think it's a joke unless they've been abused with it :ermm:
I don't care how sneakily their contract was worded, that's cruel & unusual, unbearable, if they were mislead that contract should've been null & void ---

Self-proclaimed "pain sluts" will often refuse tickling, I've also heard.
And if the jerk dug in with fingers, that's painful in addition...

Since there's so much doubt ---- no way would I buy any of that material and possibly support that sort of bully bottom feeder. :rant:
 
Last edited:
Huge difference between agreeing to a limited sensation & getting extreme torture...

Oddjob0226 said:
I reallyt doubt T.S. was trully non-con. It's possible.... but is it likely?

The non-con that Tickle Paradise did.... the woman appears under a different name in one of their auditions. She knew what they did. They mnay have just pushed her further than usual but I also assume that she agreed to it, or got well paid for it. other companies have taken ther models further than 'the usual'.
Click to expand...

Pushing someone too far, into an unbearable agonized state that they did not agree to, should clearly be unacceptable and illegal.

If they're not willing, at any point, especially if they're tricked, it's clearly wrong and some sort of assault occurred, even if it's not legally recognized. (If it's not --- that's a law that needs an amendment... :ermm: )

At the very least it's unwelcome touching, with fingers or instruments --- producing extremely unbearable sensations,
to a degree that was not agreed upon.

There's simply no ethical defense for any of this. :ermm:

Edit ----- This obviously includes those who mislead wo/men, claiming they're just "modeling" for fetish pictures in restraints, stocks, whatever ----
------- or maybe with LIGHT tickling ---- not torture.
Vanillas especially have no IDEA how bad this can get unless they've had a bad experience already...

And just because they're too trusting and go by themselves? That means nothing.
I wouldn't want a friend witnessing that myself... :blush: I'd tell a friend where I was going, when & with whom --- but that wouldn't help me in the actual situation... I went to NEST alone, thinking I was insane for it... but at least it was a hotel, very public & populated...
For a "fetish modeling shoot" in a basement --- they might be desperate for cash :( and therefore not careful enough.

*
 
Last edited:
Maybe I missed it (not a first for me) but did anyone ask the video company?

Assuming the woman was tricked - being told they would restrain her without warning of the plan to tickle her - I can see why she was mad! Fellow ticklers know how angry a surprise tickle can make certain girls, so imagine pulling that after cuffing her to a bed and keeping it up long enough to make it into a commercial video.

Legally, perhaps the company had her where they wanted her (in more ways than one) when she signed the modeling contract. But while I am not blaming the victim, were I that woman, knowing these strangers are going to tie me down, I would ask a friend to accompany me to the video shoot. I wonder who would show up for the job by herself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Door 44 Productions
What's New

4/26/2024
Visit Dorr 44 for clips! Details in the D44 box below!
Tickle Experiment
Door 44
NEST 2024
Register here
The world's largest online clip store

Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
streaming tickling videos on demand at the TMF!
Tickling videos on demand!
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
 The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top