I think it depends on which factor becomes sexually arousing - the tickling or the guy.
So if you are getting a blowjob from a guy, and the guy isn't arousing to you, but the blowjob is, then that is not gay?
I think it depends on which factor becomes sexually arousing - the tickling or the guy.
So if you are getting a blowjob from a guy, and the guy isn't arousing to you, but the blowjob is, then that is not gay?
Well, if a guy gets horny by being tickled, why would he let another guy tickle him? Same thing!
If someone gets aroused purely over being tickled then chances are they'd still be aroused if a monkey were to tickle them.
I can't judge here since I am not a guy, and maybe guys function differently than women here. But I do get aroused when someone I am attracted to or someone I love touches my boobs. I do not get aroused when someone does it who I am not attracted to or who I dislike. I don't know how much different it is for men, but I highly doubt it's an automatism unless you really touch the dick itself, and even then it might not work in every case.
I don't think M/M tickling is always gay, even if it becomes sexually arousing. I think it depends on which factor becomes sexually arousing - the tickling or the guy.
So if you're a straight guy that tickles a guy or is curious about tickling a guy that automatically makes you gay? I'm still fairly new to the fetish just trying to understand this any help would be appreciated!
So if you're a straight guy that tickles a guy or is curious about tickling a guy that automatically makes you gay?
Not all tickling is consensual. Now I'm feeling bad for a straight guy who gets turned on by tickling, gets tickled by some guy without his consent, becomes aroused and is now worried that means he's gay. He probably isn't.
If someone gets aroused purely over being tickled then chances are they'd still be aroused if a monkey were to tickle them.