french tickling

The videos of this girl have been published ?

Cause if the dont like the shooting.. I think it would not have been fun for FTManager too and if girls and him have not fun the videos should not be fun to watch

Hope FT will keep his good work as usual

Having spoken to FT a few times on here, including after he stopped posting I can confirm that according to him, his silence is not because of this issue or any other situation other than the fact that he is too busy.

As to the situation regarding the tweet thread, it seems to me that both sides have some fault.
The issue was that the model in question was not the model who'd booked the shoot, that had been her friend, and as such she hadn't spoken to FT directly to learn about exactly what she would be doing or where the clips would be displayed.
This is on FT since he should have made sure to call her separately and speak directly to her and not just assume that her friend would explain it for him, which she didn't.
One thing that I must stress, however, is that they weren't lured in. Her friend understood everything very well and knew exactly what the shoot would entail. There was no deceit on his part, only carelessness in assuming that he wouldn't have to speak to the other model directly.

The one thing that I do blame the model for was the fact that, as she confessing her own tweet , she wrote her tweets on the same day as the shoot, just after she'd gotten back to her computer. She had not had time to reflect on the situation nor had she spoken with her friend to confirm details before making her accusations public. She should have at least double checked the details with her friend if not taken the matter to the police before she decided to publicly out him with his real name and details. That is not ok.
Perhaps she felt that other women would fall into making videos for a guy she had a bad experience with and that publicly outing him was the only way to protect them. Fair enough, but maybe just double check things before you decide to resort to the nuclear option. I am not at all trying to argue that her feelings weren't valid or that she acted in bad faith but his reputation has been forever sullied over something that could have been resolved entirely if both sides had been a little clearer and more careful before acting.
I am inclined to accept Kingmakers word that the matter was settled amiably. He knows FT a lot better than me and I'm sure has spoken with him about this issue before.
As to who the models were, I have a good idea, but wont say since I don't know for a fact and their stuff was deleted anyway, which FT does if a model asks him to. He did it for both Indra and Malika due to completely normal reasons.

Haven't spoken to him about the rape message but, given how many models he has that keep coming back, it certainly doesn't seem as though they're uncomfortable with him and makes it doubtful that he's a regularly repeating offender like the message claims. Again, that doesn't make it impossible in principle but, according to Kingmaker, the allegation was looked into by the proper people and it was determined that the claims were baseless. If you wanted to put your tin foil hat on you could claim that Kingmaker is just defending his friend and making excuses for him but if FT did indeed do what the post claims then he would have to be a highly atypical type of offender. Given the fact that what little circumstantial evidence there is aligns more in defence of FT, I'll believe him and Kingmaker over an anonymous complaint unless more comes out that tips the needle the other way.

TLDR:
Model booked a shoot for herself and friend with FT.
FT explained to her what the shoot involved.
She didn't explain it to her friend properly.
FT, thinking she had explained it, also didn't explain it.
Friend was very uncomfortable during shoot because she was not prepared for a tickle shoot or how she, her friend and FT were supposed to be acting throughout.
She went home and immediately outed FT, including his name, without checking with the model who had booked the shoot to confirm details first.
Situation was dealt with and clips removed.
Only evidence to support rape allegation is a single vague anonymous entry on website.
Those in the know claim it was investigated and dismissed.
FT stopped posting due to time commitment reasons.

Disappointed he isn’t going to post anymore here. He does update his c4s store, so we can still catch his new material .

tickletherapist said:

I can't agree it's about piracy. Do you think it wouldn't be the same if she saw herself on Clips4Sale near to all those pornographic videos of other categories?
It's about the perception of tickling as something the same as pornography that should be ashamed of if you take part in it. (Especially if the tickling is indeed mixed with sexual activities like using the vibrators and nipple tickling)
This is what overtook the tickling industry, what damaged the development of the tickling community. Once at the age of Tickling Paradise it was something every next-door lady could get interested to try. Now it's related to porn only. That is the main problem and what should be changed to avoid such issues.

At least we are trying to do something to change it when we promote Tickle Therapy. To make a difference, with the invaluable help of our supporters.
http://instagram.com/smiletherapy_official - an adequate person does see the difference between this instagram and those with sexual pornographic tickling videos in them.

Click to expand...

Tickle videos often end up on facebook, YouTube, TikTok etc etc. One of the biggest ways people get outed is having material end up on non-porn websites.

Comfort Eagle said:

Tickle videos often end up on facebook, YouTube, TikTok etc etc. One of the biggest ways people get outed is having material end up on non-porn websites.

Click to expand...

It depends on the material.
If a model is upset seeing herself on youtube or social network it's only because she is ashamed of being in this video, and thinks of it as something pornographic. In other words, you mean she wanted to be only on some fetish website.
That's not the case of the thread.
Usually it's the opposite with non-naked tickling. Ladies don't mind being in videos, if it's not published on pornographic sites, which can damage their reputation.
Being tickled on youtube is not as appearing on pornhub.

Given everything that's been said on here, I can relate to FT's version of events. Whilst I don't know what happened in this case, I have had the experience of a model turning up to the shoot and then suddenly becoming panicky distressed etc. I stopped a shoot once because a model burst into tears whilst being tied up and basically said that I hadn't told her anything about bondage being involved etc, etc. In that instance, I literally had to pull up our email conversations (where all details were discussed) and read them back to her. I actually wanted to end the shoot and she ended up persuading me to go ahead but I never used any of the content anyway. I've stopped other shoots where models became too distressed. It can happen unexpectedly, even when they've said it's fine.

I've also had models seemingly have a great time and then freak out afterwards on the way home - because it was so intense and it triggered a panic attack. These situations are rare but can happen if the model is inexperienced, young, naive or has some personal issues going on that you may not be aware of. No matter how conscientious you are while shooting, there is always a risk that someone will turn around and make an accusation after the event.

Other factors include models being put forward or booked by other people (or by other models) etc. Sometimes they are not given the right information and can get freaked when they learn what the shoot involves...or they just weren't paying attention when they agreed to it. This is then difficult if they still want to shoot (to get paid) but are clearly not 100% about it. I once had a model booked for me who turned up and said 'oh sorry...I have no problem with the tickling but I can't do any video' (because of her commercial work) I agreed to cover her travel and she went home with her day wasted - all because the person who booked her decided not to tell her that it was video work.

The point is, we shouldn't judge a producer based on a single account of events, which may or may not be entirely accurate and may be related to other things - misunderstanding the shoot, a dispute, post-shooting anxiety....all of which can affect the perception of what happened etc. This is much more likely if the producer is working with amateur/girl-next-door types who have little to no concept of the industry or how it works.

Also, re: piracy this really can be an issue. I rarely ever fall out with models but on the very few occasions where a dispute has happened, it's almost always been down to their content getting re-posted somewhere. Typically model's family member finds a clip on pornhub, youtube etc and and then a massive drama erupts for which the producer is then blamed. This sort of thing does generate ill feeling and models can be quick to assume that the producer has been running a deception when they find their clips freely available on public tube sites - again, this is particularly the case if they are new or inexperienced.

Is it me ot since sometomes FT s quality is not as good as before ? Often the same models... most of his news models are foot models.. not next door girls... He was so good finding great girls before

And 90 pet cent of his content now is m or mm/f... and his New friend who doing tickling with him is not really a good tickler but he is very present tough ...

On his instagram there is his New projet.. it seems to be mm/ff with the other man.. even if he has a new mother daughter tickling

PatC said:

Is it me ot since sometomes FT s quality is not as good as before ? Often the same models... most of his news models are foot models.. not next door girls... He was so good finding great girls before

And 90 pet cent of his content now is m or mm/f... and his New friend who doing tickling with him is not really a good tickler but he is very present tough ...

On his instagram there is his New projet.. it seems to be mm/ff with the other man.. even if he has a new mother daughter tickling

Click to expand...

Agreed. His content is terrible now relative to how it used to be. All the women are pro models, a lot of whom are barely ticklish. Not to mention the massively autistic structure of all of his videos now that follow the exact same template: 20 minute video - 7 minutes ub, 13 minutes of feet. He never switches back. Even if there are 2 lers he never has one doing UB and and one doing feet. It's always 7 minutes of both tickling UB, 13 minutes of both tickling her feet. And all the female lers are awful now, if there are any at all.

It's ridiculous. Just another great site down the toilet. No wonder he has to remaster vintage videos now.