• The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

The TMF is sponsored by:

Clips4Sale Banner

Question about studio “TICKLE innocent ticklish gf” on C4S

Jrvtwinkle

Registered User
Joined
Jul 30, 2012
Messages
37
Points
6
Hi All,

Has anyone bought clips from a studio called “ TICKLE innocent ticklish gf” on C4S?

They have a series of 3 clips titled “ Maria can't hide her excitement when brutally tickled” which look intriguing. However the store has no previews for the videos, and they seem a little overpriced. Additionally the descriptions and photos for the three videos are almost identical, and it’s unclear what material is included in each part.

Can anyone verify that they’ve bought from this studio before and if the videos are any good?

Thanks in advance for any help!
 
Curious if you bought anything? I also saw something interesting, but like you im a bit hesitant.
 
I'm just as curious as you two guys. Personally, I get a creepy vibe regarding his content. The reason why I say that is what the content creator said in the written description under the video "Their weak ticklish spots: Marta, Carla, Maria and Cristina; 1 video 4 girls (Full HD Mp4)". He stated verbatim ''They are not models and they don’t know that they are taking part in a fetish tickle video. For some girls, we had to corrupt so many people to arrive to tickle them and this is the reason why some of our videos are much more expensive compared to other stores. We made this video – that include some minutes of 4 different girls tickled – very cheap to let you understand why our videos are different from the ones that use models and from the ones that don’t use expert ticklers that fly in these countries for them".

Here is the link for the message for further proof: https://www.clips4sale.com/studio/1...aria-and-cristina-1-video-4-girls-full-hd-mp4

Someone is buying his content because his studio is ranked number eight in top tickle studios regarding clips4sale.
 
Interestingly, they seem to have gotten ad space here on the forums to the left.

I'm not sure what that process looks like, but it's worth noting.
 
I don't trust it, after reading the description there are a whole bunch of red flags

Sent from my Pixel 4a (5G) using Tapatalk
 
''They are not models and they don’t know that they are taking part in a fetish tickle video.

If so, then he won't have the correct paperwork and his studio should be reported to C4S for investigation.
 
If so, then he won't have the correct paperwork and his studio should be reported to C4S for investigation.

Interestingly enough, they clarify in the description of each video that they thank a bunch of American lawyers who "made distributing these videos to the adult market possible". Sounds like they are kinda bending the rules enough to make it legal. Very curious about the clips, but they don't even have previews.
 
I don't actually buy the "non-consensual" angle they're going for. It doesn't conceptually look much different from any of the other South American/Spanish model studios that have cropped up over the last few years.
 
Producer/model here who knows how the process of uploading clips on clips4sale works. After the great Pornhub purge and the new Mastercard regulations every clip you upload has to have a compliance profile for each model. The compliance profile must have their stage name, date of birth, pic of ID, and a scanned signed model release. You cannot upload any clips of any model without a compliance profile. I inserted a pic highlighting what you have to do now when uploading a clip. Long story short all models starring in clips on clips4sale with in this year had to have known what was happening.

Screenshot_20220518-121332_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
Sorry to get a little lawyerly here, but both versions could be true. No idea what is true, simply what could be true.

Imagine a girl agrees to a bondage video having been told nothing about tickling, then once she's tied up you tell her that you really want to tickle her mercilessly. She says, "OMG, no, I hate to be tickled, and I'm really ticklish." You say, "Here's the offer: If you agree to being tickled we will double your pay -- if you don't agree, you'll just get the original bondage video pay." She says, "Damn it -- okay. But no more than X minutes."

That's a scenario where it would both be legal, and it would also be true that "They don’t know that they are taking part in a fetish tickle video" at the time of being tied up.
 
then once she's tied up

Congratulations! You now have a contract signed under duress and any first-year law student can get it thrown out of court.

PorcelainDoll is correct. Either the studio's full of shit or they need to be investigated. It's possible that they were grandfathered in before the purge, but that's unlikely. If there's anything hinky going on then it's that the girls consented to something other than what was inflicted on them, which is no bueno but there's really no way for outsiders to find out for ourselves.

I'm really curious about the videos done in the hospital, though. Purely from the logistics point of view. Bribery? Elaborate set? What?
 
Last edited:
I think its a gimmick. I don't think that he's out here lying to women about being in fetish videos then selling them. To be doing them in an actual hospital would require an insane amount of luck. I think its an elaborate set he uses.

I'm hoping at least.
 
brotherted said:
Imagine a girl agrees to a bondage video having been told nothing about tickling, then once she's tied up you tell her that you really want to tickle her mercilessly. She says, "OMG, no, I hate to be tickled, and I'm really ticklish." You say, "Here's the offer: If you agree to being tickled we will double your pay -- if you don't agree, you'll just get the original bondage video pay." She says, "Damn it -- okay. But no more than X minutes.
Congratulations! You now have a contract signed under duress and any first-year law student can get it thrown out of court.

This isn't duress. There are no threats being made. The only thing he is proposing is a modification to the contract, and If she does not agree, then you are defaulting to the original contract. To be fair, it would be better to negotiate with the performer when she is not tied up, so you don't even have the risk of the argument of duress. Based purely on the facts presented, this is clearly not duress. With that said, this site sets off my B.S. detector. It reminds me of the Paradise Vision non-consensual tickling video. For years I argued that video was a fake, but it wasn't until an audition clip emerged that some finally believed it.
 
This isn't duress. There are no threats being made.

JFC. You are out of your fucking mind if you don't think having a woman tied up is not an implied threat when it comes time to "re-negotiate" her boundaries with regards to what you're allowed to do to her.

This is why models bring escorts to shoots. Because some of you are fucked in the head.

Golden Rule me, I don't fucking care at this point. This community has no one to blame but themselves for why we're all considered to be predators.
 
There are numerous producers who use gimmicks, selling points, etc., to create a theme. How many here actually believe that FTKL's models actually are spies or martial artists? I only picked them because they're readily recognizable, but fictional themes abound.
 
Last edited:
As soon as I saw their website I came back here to see if anyone else commented on this.

For me, their site raises some bright red flags for trafficking. Like this:

T H E S O C I A L V A L U E O F T H E S E V I D E O S

The economic production generated by these videos has helped many girls.

Especially ones that live in third world countries or in places where tyranny is still a reality. It has helped break down oppression, to pay medical insurance, to see their sisters grow healthier, and to see a light at the end of the tunnel of their life.

or this:

These girls had some problems...

We solve all their PROBLEMS! We helped them and we paid their DEBTS.

With the promise of no sex and no nudity, they gave us access to their bodies... And they accepted and signed to participate tied in this test.

I appreciate porcelaindoll2's efforts to show some transparency related to C4S. I am also familiar enough with trafficking to know that releases may not mean much. I see that that C4S screenshot is in English -- do these models read English sufficiently to know what they are signing? I'm not purchasing any of the videos to find out.

If it's a gimmick, it's sufficiently creepy enough to keep me away. No thanks.
 
To elaborate a little bit, I don't think that what this producer is advertising is actually what they're doing. It appears (at least to me) to be cashing in on the idea of what is being discussed here. Taking naive, non-native English speaking girls and getting them tricked into making tickle videos.

Random Sole Encounters has made some videos where he's advertised as tying and tickling his "aunt", who was clearly Vicky Vixx, among other scenarios that don't appear to GENUINELY be what they're advertised as. Though I suppose the outside possibility that Vicky is actually his aunt exists, it's likely just an advertising strategy, same as here. Some people are into the idea of "non-con" videos, and this type of marketing will appeal to them.

I mentioned the advertising here on the TMF in my first post, and I think that's probably the biggest tell that what they're saying the videos are isn't entirely accurate. I don't think that a company that's GENUINELY using those tactics would get approval from Jeff/Myriads for ad-space on the forums here.
 
https://www.clips4sale.com/studio/1...rd-4k-60fps-mp4-multicamera-3d-audio-surround
WARNING even if this video is being distributed through the adult market, this was NOT filmed as a fetish video. What you will see in this video is real TickleTorture on a subject who really HATES the tickling. Don’t buy if you want a fun hilarious tickle session. Filmed in the Operating Room of a REAL Hospital, this video contains terrible tickle suffering. Darla - 19 years old, latin girl - is horrible ticklish and she hates be tickled. Absolutely despises it.

Have you ever wanted to see young girl being tickled in a true medical experiment? Then look no further, because we’ve done it!

In a real South American hospital, we set up a genuine experiment where girls agreed to be restrained and tested on. They knew the testing might hurt, but had no idea tickling them as much as possible would be the true objective of the science research.

They signed a contract in which they agreed to endure the entire experiment, however long it took, even if it turned out to be quite tortuous -- and it did -- also, they agreed to hold in their reactions. They must hold back any reactions they might have. We make it clear that they may not receive their rewards if they cry, laugh, scream or complain (free of charge medical insurance and treatment for them and their families as well as the removal of their families’ debts).

So one by one, they were restrained on an operating room table and had to do their best to stay still and quiet, while a doctor performed an extremely ticklish examination, without a time limit or a safeword. And then comes the turn of Darla: we discover that she is horrible ticklish and that she really hates be tickled. Absolutely despises it.

Without even addressing the fact that the vast majority of the shit in that room doesn't look like anything resembling "medical equipment", this is being treated as thought it's 100% not at all fetish related, but a "real experiment". Has anyone stopped to wonder what practical value, anyone, in any capacity, would have for such an experiment? And if for some reason someone did need this information, why was it not worth their while to actually get actual medical restraints, which a "real hospital", no matter what country, likely would have had?

The videos are staged, and since most of these videos are f/f where it looks like women tickling in some are themselves tickled in others, it stands to reason, even in the event they don't know they're whack-off videos specifically, likely are not under the impression they signed up for a legitimate medical procedure. The ol "It's not fetish shit it's just some silly thing I like to do for no reason, scouts honor!"? Maybe. But I'd be shocked if anyone in any of these believed they were "doing medical procedures".
 
JFC. You are out of your fucking mind if you don't think having a woman tied up is not an implied threat when it comes time to "re-negotiate" her boundaries with regards to what you're allowed to do to her.

If you have consensually agreed to a contract allowing yourself to be tied up, then the simple fact that you are tied up in and of itself would most likely not constitute duress under the legal definitions in most states. Now, I think most attorneys would advise that you should not try to negotiate against negotiating a contract like this because it does open you to claims of duress.
 
https://www.clips4sale.com/studio/1...rd-4k-60fps-mp4-multicamera-3d-audio-surround


Without even addressing the fact that the vast majority of the shit in that room doesn't look like anything resembling "medical equipment", this is being treated as thought it's 100% not at all fetish related, but a "real experiment". Has anyone stopped to wonder what practical value, anyone, in any capacity, would have for such an experiment? And if for some reason someone did need this information, why was it not worth their while to actually get actual medical restraints, which a "real hospital", no matter what country, likely would have had?

The videos are staged, and since most of these videos are f/f where it looks like women tickling in some are themselves tickled in others, it stands to reason, even in the event they don't know they're whack-off videos specifically, likely are not under the impression they signed up for a legitimate medical procedure. The ol "It's not fetish shit it's just some silly thing I like to do for no reason, scouts honor!"? Maybe. But I'd be shocked if anyone in any of these believed they were "doing medical procedures".

I agree completely. Tickling videos are about as real as reality tv, which is to say not very real. Most tickling videos are just bad performance art.
 
This is the same guy who said he tickles girls from poorer countries and either takes advantage of their situation or tricks them so he can tickle them then "pushes their limits" or whatever. So he had a few videos put out of him in a hotel room that might be on the site still. Hed go further on to say in forum he cant say too much in the forum but you can dm for him for the details so he doesnt get in trouble yada yada.

I raised the red flag before but this just looks like weirdo marketing (not judging the kink just the producer) from someone whos first language might not be english.
 
Com'on guys!
The forum owners have this site's ad smack dab where you can't help but see it. If there was any inkling of impropriety, it wouldn't be there. Stop with all the drama … or don't, I'm sure all interested parties prefer it continue.
 
I've bought a couple of these out of curiosity, and would agree that the non-consensual descriptions are just a narrative gimmick.

The "hospital" is almost certainly a staged set, although the one I saw did have some legitimate medical equipment (a heart rate monitor). But not like that couldn't be acquired second hand somehow. The bedroom videos look just like any other video from any Latin American or South American studio. Average camera quality and lighting, giving it an amateur look and feel.

The models are fine, nothing to write home about, and at $25-$30 a pop for 8-10 minutes of content (C4S says 14-15 min but a lot of that is eaten up with an intro that repeats the entire video description), it's definitely not worth it.
 
Two of their videos contains such brutal begging, that cannot be on Clips4sale for terms and conditions reasons, and they use as a compliment to themselves. They clearly state there's a poor family forcing a daughter to do it in one of the videos, they thank all the lawyers who made the distribuiton possible and even claim the videos are expensive because they had to corrupt people. I think they only don't use the word "rape" as advertising, because the lawyers probably told them not to.
 
Last edited:
Door 44 Productions
What's New

3/28/2024
Stop by the TMF Welcome Forum and take a second to say hello!
Tickle Experiment
Door 44
NEST 2024
Register here
The world's largest online clip store
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top