Arlina Tickled 1 Freestyle - Preview

Recently, there was a short thread here ( http://www.ticklingforum.com/showthread.php?p=1255211#post1255211) about tickling with and without bondage. That reminded me about this footage which I had some where on my 3 tera byte (super geek on steroids and all) network.

This is not my normal style, but its 'real world' tickling.

This is a voyeuristic look at a freestyle (no bondage) tickling session I had with Arlina while traveling some time back. She really wasn’t ready for this. Her feet and ribs were very responsive. She was the inaugural tickle victim for my ‘dreaded African ten toed hair brush’. When the session was over and I turned off the camera, she lay shaking and uncontrollably giggling on the bed.

This video is price reduced since it was shot in low light. But even with the low light, the tickling is very exciting.

Since you can't see her face clearly on the video, I've attached 5 photos of Arlina and her feet. You can see more photos of Arlina by visiting http://myspace.com/tickling and reading my blog. Subscribe to my blog to be kept up to date on the musings of a truly feindish tickle freak.


The full 12 minute video is on sale today at ShyAndWildTickling.com.

James Darke

BTW, simply clicking the image ad at the end of the video preview helps me out so I can keep providing these free videos.


<script src="http://flash.revver.com/player/1.0/player.js?mediaId:125686;affiliateId:17500;height:392;width:480;" type="text/javascript"></script>

If you're not afraid of her moving so wildly (wild enough to hit you by accident) then go for freestyle.

"Can't move a damn inch" = 45% of votes, but less than 10% of all clips.

So much for supply and demand.

11225 said:

If you're not afraid of her moving so wildly (wild enough to hit you by accident) then go for freestyle.

Click to expand...

The reason there was no bondage in this clip is because I was unprepared. I would have loved to do a bound tickle session with her because I could really take her over the edge.

Even though I'm not a 90 pound weakling, it still took lots of muscle resources to keep her tickle spots accessible. This often meant one hand could join in the veliication festivities.

JD

hivoltage said:

"Can't move a damn inch" = 45% of votes, but less than 10% of all clips.

So much for supply and demand.

Click to expand...

I think there's a really good reason for this.

For those who are really experienced at tying and tickling, you have likely learned of a physiological phenomenon where a small amount of give (slack) in the bondage gives just enough hope of evasion to the ticklee that they persist in the futile attempt to avoid being tickled. Take away all hope with absolute immobility and you're likely to end up with laughter and very little struggle.

If you also think for a video viewer's perspective also, there would be very little action to see.

So, IMHO I think the desire to see total immobility in tickling is more fantasy than a practical thing. But hey, I'm just one guy and I could be way off base by miles.

JD

oh... taught plz...

jmsdarke said:

So, IMHO I think the desire to see total immobility in tickling is more fantasy than a practical thing. But hey, I'm just one guy and I could be way off base by miles.

Click to expand...

Well, I'm not a producer, and I certainly don't have the experience you do with tying people up, so you probably have more insight on this than I do. But I humbly disagree, simply because the very few videos where I actually see that complete immobility are some of my favorites.

Actually, it's more common with the hardcore bondage sites, like insex -- when they tie somebody up, she's completely helpless. When they add tickling to the mix, the lee sometimes can't do anything but tremble and laugh. Obviously if that were the case in every video, it could get boring. On the other hand, mixing that in with your normal semi-tight bondage would be a nice change of pace. Based on the poll, it would be very well-received, too.

HisFlyinFingers said:

Well, I'm not a producer, and I certainly don't have the experience you do with tying people up, so you probably have more insight on this than I do. But I humbly disagree, simply because the very few videos where I actually see that complete immobility are some of my favorites.

Actually, it's more common with the hardcore bondage sites, like insex -- when they tie somebody up, she's completely helpless. When they add tickling to the mix, the lee sometimes can't do anything but tremble and laugh. Obviously if that were the case in every video, it could get boring. On the other hand, mixing that in with your normal semi-tight bondage would be a nice change of pace. Based on the poll, it would be very well-received, too.

Click to expand...

I agree that adding tickling to super tight bondage will increase the perception of one's vulnerability and helplessness. What I was saying is that in comparison to bondage tickling in which there is some small slack in the restraints, super tight bondage tickling offers less of a show to the viewer because the ticklee has practically no response room and submits to their fate. Of course there will be exceptions, and I've seen a couple. But I've seen more examples and experienced more cases where the fact that they resign them selves to their fate meant to reward for the ticklee was truly smaller.

But we’re still just in 2006. Someone may yet stumble upon the right combination of position, super tight restraint, tickle tool and physiological stimulus that makes this kind of tickling get to the soul of the ticklee and light them up like a Christmas tree. It could happen.

JD