sub-forum possibility???

cradock · Nov 29, 2007

As there is a non-tickling images section in the images forum, do people agree that there should be a non-tickling clips section in the clips forum, for content such as foot modelling clips, celebrity pics etc that sometimes get posted in the tickling section anyway?

Just a thought 😛

drew70 · Nov 29, 2007

I'd have to vote no. Clips take up a lot more bandwidth than pictures. If anything, they need to crack down on some of the non-tickling off-topic clips that do get posted.

subZer0 · Nov 29, 2007

That's what the mainstream clips forum is used for. As far as to say (on the TMF, anyway) mainstream seems to cover anything that isn't tickling.

TMF Jeff · Nov 29, 2007

Sorry, but the others are right, it would be a big bandwidth hit that I don't really want to take. If people want to post like a clip of Kelly Ripa's foot in the mainstream section, I tend to ignore it, but I don't want to open up a forum where there would be a ton of full length foot fetish and regular sex clips.

Dr. Vollin · Dec 29, 2007

Why not follow drew's suggestion and crack down on non-tickling clips?

Redhering · Dec 31, 2007

subZer0 said:
That's what the mainstream clips forum is used for. As far as to say (on the TMF, anyway) mainstream seems to cover anything that isn't tickling.

My impression was always that it was supposed to be for clips that contained tickling but were from 'mainstream' movies and television shows. At least that's what I look for when I go there 😉

sub-forum possibility???

cradock

TMF Poster

drew70

Guest

subZer0

2nd Level Red Feather

TMF Jeff

TMF owner and co-founder

Dr. Vollin

TMF Master

Redhering

TMF Novice