GoForTheLaugh
TMF Expert
- Joined
- May 6, 2005
- Messages
- 310
- Points
- 0
Since I am the person who started the other thread on BDSM and, unfortunately, used an inappropriate judgmental tone, I hope that this thread will help build bridges between the tickling community and the BDSM community. For a number of people on this board who consider themselves part of both communities, there really is no difference between the two.
For many us, BDSM invokes negative images based largely on our--I am part of "our"--misunderstanding of it.
I am sure some people are asking what on earth I am talking about. BDSM = Bondage & Discipline / Domination & Submission / Sadism & Masochism. It is a relatively new blanket term for many practices.
As a tickle fan, I have admitted that, even though I have no wish to be part of the BDSM scene, there is clearly something of BDSM in me. Although all my tickle experiences and what I continue to look for can be summed up as sexual foreplay and non-sexual horseplay (and thus of short duration), I have indeed fantasized about torture tickling. Since, sadly, I am not ticklish, I can only image what it would be like as a lee. The thought of tickling someone else (who is willing!) for such an extended period does turn me on, however. I have never done it and may never--but that turn on tells me that I am not as innocent as I imagine myself.
So here I am, interested in learning what kinks are all about; I am sure I am not the only one.
As a tickle fan and a gay man, how can I possibly judge someone else's sexuality?
Further, those who feel they have to be quiet among the tickle fans need no longer be quiet.
As I understand it (and I could be wrong), just as we tickle fans find the stimulation of being tickled simultaneously pleasant and unpleasant (more of the former and less of the latter, I would think), people who practice BDSM process pain differently in a sexually-charged BDSM atmosphere. They would still want painkillers after surgery or at the dentist's, however, as they do not actually enjoy pain. Rather, they enjoy the same sexual stimulation as all of humanity.
Think of it this way: Non-BDSM sex includes a few painful practices that are not processed the same way during intercourse as they might be in a non-sexualized environment. Isn't giving someone a hickey, for example, a painful act?
There is also the tremendous psychological satisfaction of power exchange, where people allow themselves to dominate or be dominated by another or others for a pre-arranged period. Everything is worked out beforehand, and all participants have agreed on limits. In the past, I would have said that such people needed serious psychological help. Today, however, I think people who do this and thus dig into and explore hidden areas of their psyches are probably very, very healthy. Isn't what they do the goal of psychotherapy? Aren't they in fact promoting their own mental well being and that of others?
For many us, BDSM invokes negative images based largely on our--I am part of "our"--misunderstanding of it.
I am sure some people are asking what on earth I am talking about. BDSM = Bondage & Discipline / Domination & Submission / Sadism & Masochism. It is a relatively new blanket term for many practices.
As a tickle fan, I have admitted that, even though I have no wish to be part of the BDSM scene, there is clearly something of BDSM in me. Although all my tickle experiences and what I continue to look for can be summed up as sexual foreplay and non-sexual horseplay (and thus of short duration), I have indeed fantasized about torture tickling. Since, sadly, I am not ticklish, I can only image what it would be like as a lee. The thought of tickling someone else (who is willing!) for such an extended period does turn me on, however. I have never done it and may never--but that turn on tells me that I am not as innocent as I imagine myself.
So here I am, interested in learning what kinks are all about; I am sure I am not the only one.
As a tickle fan and a gay man, how can I possibly judge someone else's sexuality?
Further, those who feel they have to be quiet among the tickle fans need no longer be quiet.
As I understand it (and I could be wrong), just as we tickle fans find the stimulation of being tickled simultaneously pleasant and unpleasant (more of the former and less of the latter, I would think), people who practice BDSM process pain differently in a sexually-charged BDSM atmosphere. They would still want painkillers after surgery or at the dentist's, however, as they do not actually enjoy pain. Rather, they enjoy the same sexual stimulation as all of humanity.
Think of it this way: Non-BDSM sex includes a few painful practices that are not processed the same way during intercourse as they might be in a non-sexualized environment. Isn't giving someone a hickey, for example, a painful act?
There is also the tremendous psychological satisfaction of power exchange, where people allow themselves to dominate or be dominated by another or others for a pre-arranged period. Everything is worked out beforehand, and all participants have agreed on limits. In the past, I would have said that such people needed serious psychological help. Today, however, I think people who do this and thus dig into and explore hidden areas of their psyches are probably very, very healthy. Isn't what they do the goal of psychotherapy? Aren't they in fact promoting their own mental well being and that of others?
Last edited: