yes, it can be done...
Okay, here's a dose of reality and hope. There are two ways to do movies these days: film, or video. Film stock is very good quality, but is insanely expensive. I'm talking thousands of dollars for a mere 30 minutes, and you will probably only get one or two takes at max. It is sold from Kodak by the foot, and you think, 24 frames a second, 60 seconds to a minute, ...that's really expensive. Now, secondly, people who aren't into tickling won't buy this, so that must also be accepted. You can't really mainstream something that isn't mainstream. Not everyone has a tickle fetish. I'm not trying to burst any bubbles, but facts are facts. If a person doesn't have this fetish, there's no way they will buy those movies. (notice I said THOSE..) Would you buy a video that features only leather if you don't have a leather fetish? Of course not!
Here's the hope. Actually, I've been pushing this for a LONG time. When I say we should have different videos, more variety, this is what I meant. There's only so many videos you can sell featuring a girl in stocks with bare feet being tickled until people get bored. If you had a video that featured EVERYTHING, (feet, pantyhose, heels, sandals, costumes, etc.) more people would find their particular like, and buy it. Instead of selling a certain amount to bare foot lovers, the pantyhose lovers will buy also. You will make more money and therefore business will be good and customers will be happy.
If it is shot on video, it is easily possible. Film must be light checked, loaded properly, etc. etc. If you screw up, that hundred dollar roll is useless! The sound must be properly syncronized, on and on. There is no auto focus, you need really good lighting, because film requires a lot of light....on and on and on. Video is difficult to screw up, because the general public must use it. The general public is...whew, hell they can even mess up video!
Since this is a small market, video, especially digital video which is what CNN and the major television networks use, is perfect. The camera's are affordable, and the quality is great. More importantly, since models are paid by the hour (though again, convince them to accept a day rate so you won't be rushed) it is quicker. You set everything up, and just move the whole camera and tripod at each shot. A shot of her feet walking over carpet...pause..a long shot of her walking with feather in hand..pause...medium shot of her head and hand holding a feather..pause...reaction shot of model tied to chair..pause..wiggling feet (pantyhosed clad or not, wearing shoes or not)..pause...medium shot of model with feather taking off her shoes...pause...close up of hand slowly removing shoe..pause.....etc. This can be done very quickly and with great results. It will take a LITTLE more
work than just turn camera on and off after 15 minutes, but just tell the model this is what we will do. Those models, by the way, would probably LOVE to do something with real acting, that a little complex. Don't you ever think they get bored or maybe even think it's stupid doing the blah old tickle video?
You can include many aspects to one video: high heels, low heels, pantyhose, pantyhosed sandals, dress, skirt, pants, dress pants, dress pants with high heeled sandals, mini skirt, genie, teacher, spy, interrogation, humourous revenge, fun at the office, on and on. The possibilities are endless. there's no way you could do ONE video like this, you'd have to do many just to get a few ideas through. I can imagine at least a hundred different situations off the top of my head: A secretary finds a magic lamp, and for her wish, she wishes to tickle the genie, but in return the genie must tickle her. Or she wants the genie to tickle her! The genie could wear pantyhose too. They could both take the hose off later, so you'd have a pantyhose AND barefoot video.
Good luck, and I can give more ideas and tips if needed.
