Dave2112
Level of Cherry Feather
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2001
- Messages
- 10,292
- Points
- 0
Ok, before any of you Pats fans start crying here, I'll let you know that this post comes from a Pats fan. Ask Ray how SBG1 was after the Pats won the upset victory over the Rams in XXXVI. Or ask anyone in my house about the decibel level in the almost-overtime victory in XXXVIII.
AND, what is to follow is not conjecture, but fact. I've scoured the stats on NFL.com and have been taping the Pats games since Week 3. (Hey, I live in New England...every televised game on CBS is a Pats game).
The New England Patriots get at least one holding penalty when an opponent is inside the red-zone...63% of the time. The Home-Field NFL average? 24.7%.
Opponents' holding penalties against the Pats outside the red zone? 14.3%. The league average? 21.9%.
Opponents' "offensive interferance" penalties on passing plays of 15 or more yards against the Pats...19%. League average - 4.5%.
Facemask penalties against Pats opponents at Gillette Stadium - an average of 1 every 11 plays. League average - 1 every 34 plays.
Pass interferance penalties against the Pats' opposition - 18% of all passing plays. Pass interferance calls against the Patriots - .9% of all passing plays.
Penalties negating touchdowns against the Patriots - 17% of all TD's scored against them. Penalties negating Patriots' touchdowns - 1.9%
These are just the stats I could get numerics on. Am I the only one noticing something here? Now, I'm not saying the Pats aren't a great team, because they are. But is the NFL that obsessed with proving that a dynasty can happen in the post-free agency/salary cap era? I'm not accusing anyone of "fixing" games, because I know that it would ruin the sport if it ever came out....but this is a little weird, no?
Just once, I'd like to see the Pats kick the shit out of someone with NO penalties deciding a score. It would be a refreshing change of pace.
AND, what is to follow is not conjecture, but fact. I've scoured the stats on NFL.com and have been taping the Pats games since Week 3. (Hey, I live in New England...every televised game on CBS is a Pats game).
The New England Patriots get at least one holding penalty when an opponent is inside the red-zone...63% of the time. The Home-Field NFL average? 24.7%.
Opponents' holding penalties against the Pats outside the red zone? 14.3%. The league average? 21.9%.
Opponents' "offensive interferance" penalties on passing plays of 15 or more yards against the Pats...19%. League average - 4.5%.
Facemask penalties against Pats opponents at Gillette Stadium - an average of 1 every 11 plays. League average - 1 every 34 plays.
Pass interferance penalties against the Pats' opposition - 18% of all passing plays. Pass interferance calls against the Patriots - .9% of all passing plays.
Penalties negating touchdowns against the Patriots - 17% of all TD's scored against them. Penalties negating Patriots' touchdowns - 1.9%
These are just the stats I could get numerics on. Am I the only one noticing something here? Now, I'm not saying the Pats aren't a great team, because they are. But is the NFL that obsessed with proving that a dynasty can happen in the post-free agency/salary cap era? I'm not accusing anyone of "fixing" games, because I know that it would ruin the sport if it ever came out....but this is a little weird, no?
Just once, I'd like to see the Pats kick the shit out of someone with NO penalties deciding a score. It would be a refreshing change of pace.




