Appreciation

[Sketch Zero]

Just wanted to say that I appreciate the zero-tolerance policy on content involving minors here. When I search sites like DeviantArt and sort by "recent", there have been a number of times that I've stumbled onto accounts of fetishists grooming or otherwise abusing children (i.e. indulging their "DoN't WoRrY aBoUt It, iT's OnLy TiCkLiNg" fetishes on kids). I report them when I find them but DA does not make this easy and seems to be very wishy-washy on policy.

Anyway, thanks.

 

[Yote]

These reasons are why I don't like using sites like Deviantart to look at tickling content. I should not have come across underage content as much as I did, which I could clearly tell were for fetish purposes. I'm glad that TMF has a strict policy against it.

 

[tickletherapist]

I thought DeviantArt specialises in tickling art, not photos? How can they abuse children then?

 

[Sketch Zero]

I thought DeviantArt specialises in tickling art, not photos? How can they abuse children then?

There are plenty of photographs on DeviantArt, as photography can be an art form.

 

[Tenebrae]

These reasons are why I don't like using sites like Deviantart to look at tickling content. I should not have come across underage content as much as I did, which I could clearly tell were for fetish purposes. I'm glad that TMF has a strict policy against it.

Yet DeviantART has some of the greatest tickling art. You should not miss out on the good stuff just because there are some awful sickos~

 

[jklopez]

I guess I never searched that deeply into DeviantArt, I've never seen anything involving minors on DeviantArt. I have seen that fury nonsense though. But then, I guess you shouldn't be surprised at what you see in a place called DeviantArt.

 

[moose]

honestly i don't think DA is that bad when it comes to tickling stuff if anything youtube is way worse for that kind of stuff