Best Lines for Getting Women to Admit Their Ticklishness

[laffmaker1234]

Without tickling a woman or even being in the same room with her (phone, email), what's the best line to get her to admit her ticklishness? For example: "What kinds of pranks did your older brothers play on you?" "Well, they know how ticklish I am so they'd sneak behind me and tweak my ribs and make me jump."

 

[FFT32]

How about just asking, "Are you ticklish?" Simple but effective.

 

[milagros317]

"How often do you get a pedicure in a nail salon?" might elicit that she rarely or never does because she's too ticklish.

 

[idolfan05]

"How often do you get a pedicure in a nail salon?" might elicit that she rarely or never does because she's too ticklish.

I don’t because I am too ticklish. I had one done once by a friend who did pedicures at salons anyway- we grew up together- she’s 10 years older than me or about, had her do a pedicure on me before and was literally biting into my shirt cause it tickled so much and she was gentle. She simply wiped a washcloth over my foot and I lost it.

 

[laffmaker1234]

How about just asking, "Are you ticklish?" Simple but effective.

That's a great line if you've got a new girlfriend and you're snuggling together on the couch. I mean a way to get ANYONE to admit their ticklishness in situations where asking them would be wholly inappropriate. Such as: your friend's wife, your lady boss, a female neighbor, a coworker, your kid's babysitter.

 

[SoleMates]

How about just asking, "Are you ticklish?" Simple but effective.

Don't be silly. Then they wouldn't be able to be creepy about it and get them to admit this totally normal thing like it's some deep dark humiliating secret.

Fetishists, I swear.

 

[hopefulscrambl]

I think if you're in a situation where it would be weird to ask "are you ticklish", it's probably also a situation where it's weird to try and manipulate someone into saying they're ticklish. You probably shouldn't be contriving schemes to figure out whether your kid's babysitter is someone you can sexually fantasize about. That's kinda weird.

Although, so as to avoid completely bringing the mood down, I'll give probably the most unique question I've heard that revealed someone is ticklish - "have you ever kicked anyone" (in a discussion of who would win in a hypothetical fight), which got the answer "not intentionally". When asked for clarification on how often she'd unintentionally kicked people, we got a defensive "well, sometimes people tickle my feet!"

So there you go. Try that one, I guess.

 

[laffmaker1234]

I think if you're in a situation where it would be weird to ask "are you ticklish", it's probably also a situation where it's weird to try and manipulate someone into saying they're ticklish. You probably shouldn't be contriving schemes to figure out whether your kid's babysitter is someone you can sexually fantasize about. That's kinda weird.

Although, so as to avoid completely bringing the mood down, I'll give probably the most unique question I've heard that revealed someone is ticklish - "have you ever kicked anyone" (in a discussion of who would win in a hypothetical fight), which got the answer "not intentionally". When asked for clarification on how often she'd unintentionally kicked people, we got a defensive "well, sometimes people tickle my feet!"

So there you go. Try that one, I guess.

Thanks for your input and my reply is not meant to be argumentative. I am just genuinely curious. By your standard, wouldn't anything other than saying: "Are you ticklish? The reason I ask is because I have a tickle fetish and would find it sexually arousing to hear that you are ticklish" be a contrived scheme? I mean, even "are you ticklish" to someone who doesn't share or understand that it's a turn-on for many might be "duped" into giving an answer under false pretenses.

I notice a lot of people on here have foot fetishes. By your definition, the innocent "did you get a new pedicure" without adding "because I'm turned on by feet" would be that same eliciting of information under false pretenses.

 

[hopefulscrambl]

Thanks for your input and my reply is not meant to be argumentative. I am just genuinely curious. By your standard, wouldn't anything other than saying: "Are you ticklish? The reason I ask is because I have a tickle fetish and would find it sexually arousing to hear that you are ticklish" be a contrived scheme? I mean, even "are you ticklish" to someone who doesn't share or understand that it's a turn-on for many might be "duped" into giving an answer under false pretenses.

I notice a lot of people on here have foot fetishes. By your definition, the innocent "did you get a new pedicure" without adding "because I'm turned on by feet" would be that same eliciting of information under false pretenses.

That's a fair point, and perhaps I was overly harsh (I'm somewhat sleep deprived, so sorry if I did!).

But I think the distinguishing factor is contriving things. There's a difference between "did you get a new pedicure" while people are discussing their beauty regimes and "did you get a new pedicure" when talking to your boss about the quarterly returns. It's the difference between questions where "this might turn me on" is a factor vs ones where it's the only factor, and I think a lot of "lines to get people to admit they're ticklish" fall into the latter category - it's clear that you're only asking this because you want to get off on the answer and it wouldn't be something you would otherwise say, and if nothing else people can usually pick up on that (we've all met the guy who keeps asking about women's foot care routines in great detail and clearly isn't fooling anyone).

I guess it's the same as any other ulterior motive. Think the difference between me inviting you over while hoping you bring your cute friend I have a crush on, vs me only inviting you over because you'll bring your cute friend I have a crush on. One is pretty normal and you'd probably laugh off if you found out, one is manipulative and likely to upset you if you find out. I think that's the meaningful distinction here. Asking someone about their ticklishness only because you would find the answer sexually arousing is probably, on the scheming side, no matter how subtle you are about it.

 

[maniactickler]

On a second date with a girl, i just went for it. we were in a department store and she was waiting for me to return from the bathroom. i came back and she had her back to me, so i gave a quick tickle to her sides and she yelped. luckily she had no issue with it.

 

[laffmaker1234]

That's a fair point, and perhaps I was overly harsh (I'm somewhat sleep deprived, so sorry if I did!).

But I think the distinguishing factor is contriving things. There's a difference between "did you get a new pedicure" while people are discussing their beauty regimes and "did you get a new pedicure" when talking to your boss about the quarterly returns. It's the difference between questions where "this might turn me on" is a factor vs ones where it's the only factor, and I think a lot of "lines to get people to admit they're ticklish" fall into the latter category - it's clear that you're only asking this because you want to get off on the answer and it wouldn't be something you would otherwise say, and if nothing else people can usually pick up on that (we've all met the guy who keeps asking about women's foot care routines in great detail and clearly isn't fooling anyone).

I guess it's the same as any other ulterior motive. Think the difference between me inviting you over while hoping you bring your cute friend I have a crush on, vs me only inviting you over because you'll bring your cute friend I have a crush on. One is pretty normal and you'd probably laugh off if you found out, one is manipulative and likely to upset you if you find out. I think that's the meaningful distinction here. Asking someone about their ticklishness only because you would find the answer sexually arousing is probably, on the scheming side, no matter how subtle you are about it.

No worries. You weren't overly harsh. 🙂. Your analogy makes sense but I think is a little different. If you invited me over under the guise that you were my friend but all you wanted to do was meet my cute friend, I'd probably be upset (not overly upset, but nonetheless upset). I'd feel used. But if some woman who has a fetish for facial hair touched my chin and said "you need a shave," I'd probably never know it sexually gratified her. And if I later found out, I might even be flattered. If her fetish was something I found REALLY weird, like if she asked me if I ever have to far and struggle to contain doing so in public, and I said "yes" very innocently, and then found out it was her fetish, yeah, I'd think that was weird. But someone with a farting fetish probably would not find it weird. 🙂

 

[FFT32]

That's a great line if you've got a new girlfriend and you're snuggling together on the couch. I mean a way to get ANYONE to admit their ticklishness in situations where asking them would be wholly inappropriate. Such as: your friend's wife, your lady boss, a female neighbor, a coworker, your kid's babysitter.

Totally true. I internationally provided a smplistic smart ass but playful response to the post. ;0)

 

[FFT32]

Don't be silly. Then they wouldn't be able to be creepy about it and get them to admit this totally normal thing like it's some deep dark humiliating secret.

Fetishists, I swear.

Whoops. Sorry! ;0)