• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

bondage models being tickled unexpectedly

damdu

TMF Poster
Joined
Jun 27, 2022
Messages
138
Points
18
whether bondage models who did not decide to have tickle sessions were tickled anyway for as long as it lasted
 
I know this is a fantasy scenario, but a few producers pulled this crap and it is a BS move. Keep that s*** in the realm of fantasy. Freaking triggered because people pull that crap without discussion and sometimes knowing that tickling is a limit for the model.
 
I know this is a fantasy scenario, but a few producers pulled this crap and it is a BS move. Keep that s*** in the realm of fantasy. Freaking triggered because people pull that crap without discussion and sometimes knowing that tickling is a limit for the model.
Are you writing from personal experience?
Because otherwise how could you know to what the model had consented in advance just by watching the video? Honest question.

My understanding is that most bdsm videos have the models check boxes in advance from a long list of potential actions that could be done to them to which they do, or don’t, consent.

I could easily imagine a scenario where a model only rejects consent for a few of the most extremely intimate or painful acts, leaving ticking off her banned list — and yet is still very much not expecting it once it starts. That could feel to a viewer of such a video like non-con, when it actually wouldn’t be.

But again, if you’re speaking from personal experience, what I wrote doesn’t apply.
 
Are you writing from personal experience?
Because otherwise how could you know to what the model had consented in advance just by watching the video? Honest question.

My understanding is that most bdsm videos have the models check boxes in advance from a long list of potential actions that could be done to them to which they do, or don’t, consent.

I could easily imagine a scenario where a model only rejects consent for a few of the most extremely intimate or painful acts, leaving ticking off her banned list — and yet is still very much not expecting it once it starts. That could feel to a viewer of such a video like non-con, when it actually wouldn’t be.

But again, if you’re speaking from personal experience, what I wrote doesn’t apply.
"bondage models being tickled unexpectedly" implies that it was not discussed prior to. Then the OP wrote this "whether bondage models who did not decide to have tickle sessions were tickled anyway for as long as it lasted"

What about that seems consensual to you?
 
"bondage models being tickled unexpectedly" implies that it was not discussed prior to. Then the OP wrote this "whether bondage models who did not decide to have tickle sessions were tickled anyway for as long as it lasted"

What about that seems consensual to you?
I think he means bondage models who did not sign up for a full on tickle shoot/session, being tickled briefly/intermittently during the course of a bondage shoot. I've seen numerous clips like this where the clip is mainly bondage/DID and tickling is thrown in there as a punishment/motivation or just because. I imagine the details of this are worked out ahead of time and agreed to by the model. They may not know when the tickles are coming, just that they are coming which can lead to a more surprised reaction when it happens.

I don't think anyone is stupid enough to say hey, so-and-so model lets do a bondage shoot and now that I have you tied down I'm going to tickle or do whatever the hell I want to you because I can and you can't do anything to stop me. That seems like a recipe for a large legal headache.
 
I think he means bondage models who did not sign up for a full on tickle shoot/session, being tickled briefly/intermittently during the course of a bondage shoot. I've seen numerous clips like this where the clip is mainly bondage/DID and tickling is thrown in there as a punishment/motivation or just because. I imagine the details of this are worked out ahead of time and agreed to by the model. They may not know when the tickles are coming, just that they are coming which can lead to a more surprised reaction when it happens.

I don't think anyone is stupid enough to say hey, so-and-so model lets do a bondage shoot and now that I have you tied down I'm going to tickle or do whatever the hell I want to you because I can and you can't do anything to stop me. That seems like a recipe for a large legal headache.
People are stupid enough to try things that they did not discuss beforehand or were even told not to do.

I took the post at face value and responded. Nothing about that sounded consensual in the slightest.

If done as described in the OP, that model would probably stick it out to get paid, but never work with or recommend that producer going forward.
 
What's New
12/27/25
Visit Clips4Sale for the webs largest collection of tickling clips!

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Top