Are you writing from personal experience?I know this is a fantasy scenario, but a few producers pulled this crap and it is a BS move. Keep that s*** in the realm of fantasy. Freaking triggered because people pull that crap without discussion and sometimes knowing that tickling is a limit for the model.
"bondage models being tickled unexpectedly" implies that it was not discussed prior to. Then the OP wrote this "whether bondage models who did not decide to have tickle sessions were tickled anyway for as long as it lasted"Are you writing from personal experience?
Because otherwise how could you know to what the model had consented in advance just by watching the video? Honest question.
My understanding is that most bdsm videos have the models check boxes in advance from a long list of potential actions that could be done to them to which they do, or don’t, consent.
I could easily imagine a scenario where a model only rejects consent for a few of the most extremely intimate or painful acts, leaving ticking off her banned list — and yet is still very much not expecting it once it starts. That could feel to a viewer of such a video like non-con, when it actually wouldn’t be.
But again, if you’re speaking from personal experience, what I wrote doesn’t apply.
I think he means bondage models who did not sign up for a full on tickle shoot/session, being tickled briefly/intermittently during the course of a bondage shoot. I've seen numerous clips like this where the clip is mainly bondage/DID and tickling is thrown in there as a punishment/motivation or just because. I imagine the details of this are worked out ahead of time and agreed to by the model. They may not know when the tickles are coming, just that they are coming which can lead to a more surprised reaction when it happens."bondage models being tickled unexpectedly" implies that it was not discussed prior to. Then the OP wrote this "whether bondage models who did not decide to have tickle sessions were tickled anyway for as long as it lasted"
What about that seems consensual to you?
People are stupid enough to try things that they did not discuss beforehand or were even told not to do.I think he means bondage models who did not sign up for a full on tickle shoot/session, being tickled briefly/intermittently during the course of a bondage shoot. I've seen numerous clips like this where the clip is mainly bondage/DID and tickling is thrown in there as a punishment/motivation or just because. I imagine the details of this are worked out ahead of time and agreed to by the model. They may not know when the tickles are coming, just that they are coming which can lead to a more surprised reaction when it happens.
I don't think anyone is stupid enough to say hey, so-and-so model lets do a bondage shoot and now that I have you tied down I'm going to tickle or do whatever the hell I want to you because I can and you can't do anything to stop me. That seems like a recipe for a large legal headache.