• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • Reminder - We have a ZERO TOLERANCE policy regarding content involving minors, regardless of intent. Any content containing minors will result in an immediate ban. If you see any such content, please report it using the "report" button on the bottom left of the post.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Bush Administration Proposes Testing 4-year-olds

njjen3953

4th Level Orange Feather
Joined
Apr 18, 2001
Messages
2,858
Points
0
The January 17 edition of the Washington Post contained this alarming story about the Bush Adminstration's continued attack on the Head Start program....

"The Bush administration announced yesterday that it will soon implement an unprecedented annual assessment of the 908,000 4-year-olds in Head Start programs nationwide, an effort that officials said will determine how much the children are learning in the government-funded preschool program for the poor. Government officials ....said the system would for the first time provide standardized data that would allow them to evaluate local Head Start programs. The results of the assessments -- scheduled to be administered for the first time this fall -- would help determine where to target resources, they said.&nbssp;'This is necessary to ensure that every child is progressing the way that they should,' said Windy Hill, chief of the Head Start Bureau....

"Some experts and leaders of local Head Start programs criticized the government's National Reporting on Child Outcomes plan, saying it amounts to a high-stakes test for preschoolers that will yield little useful information because children are too young to be evaluated with a standardized exam. 'Young children are poor test takers . . . and have a restricted ability to comprehend assessment cues,' said Samuel J. Meisels, president of the Erikson Institute, a nonprofit organization that trains child development professionals.

"The national reporting system is the latest effort in a major early-childhood initiative announced last spring by President Bush, who wants to shift Head Start's focus from nurturing children's social and emotional development to emphasizing early literacy. Bush views the program as a follow-up to his K-12 education program, which emphasizes standardized tests.

"Last year, the administration began the early-childhood initiative by promoting literacy seminars for local Head Start officials, many of whom said they were pressured to learn and use techniques that they didn't want or need. Critics say promoting literacy over other services that develop a child's social and emotional well-being is counterproductive because Head Start children are unable to focus on learning their ABC's if they are burdened by other troubles....

"Craig Ramey, a co-director of the Center on Health and Education at Georgetown University who is heading the group creating the assessment, acknowledged there are 'a limited number of high-quality, usable tools' on the market but that his panel would find what works....Ramey's panel is working with Westat, a research company being paid $1.8 million to help develop the assessment.

"An outstanding issue is who will administer the assessments. Ramey said teachers would be involved, but suggested some might be tempted to cheat. 'The simple way to game the system is to have kids not do well in the fall and do well in the spring,' he said, adding that independent verification was key. Ramey likened the new system to industrial quality assurance programs. 'What we are bringing to Head Start is not different from what you encounter when you go to buy a car,' he said, noting that car buyers trust that companies maintain quality from plant to plant...

"Hill said programs that fail to meet standards have always risked decertification. But in a recent interview, Wade Horn, assistant secretary for children and families in HHS, said that 'people who are anxious about the use of this to defund [local programs] . . . are being overly concerned. We don't anticipate that happening very often.'"
 
sounds like a good idea

what's wrong with finding out who's doing the job right, and who's wasting the money?
look at it this way, maybe we'll find out that some are doing a great job, and learn from them, and teach their method to those that aren't doing squat.
steve
 
I am against it.

A 4 year old child needs to learn to socialize first. Reading and other academics can come when they get to elementary school.

"A successful child is one who can above all socialize" -Bev Bos
 
My concern would be...

...that in 'testing' these young children, especially with standardized tests that would not show any kind of dramatic results as far as academics, that the Administration would find an xcuse to cut the program, not target resources. "Oh look, little Johnny can't read yet so what's the point in starting them early?" Call me cynical, but that's how I see it.
 
I agree with Jen on this one and Ialso share Nightfalls concerns.
 
Hm..

I don't see a big problem with it...although it is a little strange.
 
The problem with the Head Start program is not that it doesn't work, but that it's stopped too soon, and that the children who modestly benefit from it suffer from poverty, negating any progress made. Testing these kids to death won't help. The only real solution is to lift them out of poverty, something that won't happen anytime soon. 🙁
 
Seems unfair to me...

I don't think four years old is the right age to be testing these children, alot of children aren't even in a school system of any kind at that age. Kind of a lopsided approach. I think they should be more concerned with the conditions and treatment of the children. I think the results will mostly reflect what the kids have learned at home.

-Phil
 
phil you bring up a good point

that what a kid learns at home, will come out.
correct me if i'm wrong, but wasn't the point of the head start program, to bring up the level of the poorer kids to the level of the middle class, and wealthy kids? to over come their poor beginings?
well what's wrong with finding out if the program is working, or just another waste of tax payer money?
if the head start program is really benificial, and providing valuble training/ecucation, then heck, i'm all for it! on the other hand, if it's just another worthless leach on the backs of us taxpayers, i say get rid of it! why pay for something that doesn't work???
steve
 
How is giving tests to four-year-olds going to determine whether or not the program works? Were you ready to take tests, or even grasp the concept of "test," when you were four? There have got to be better ways to assess whether the program is working.

(And no, I'm not against the idea of testing -- I just think it should be reserved for older kids, at a level where school is more concerned with academic work.)
 
I think they are putting way too much pressure of kids today, 4 years old is too young in my humble opinion. They need to learn to socialize like Jen stated.
I do however believe in the headstart program. They prepare the children for school, teach them a lot of good things. But putting them through tests at age 4......no!
 
What's New
2/16/26
Check out Door 44 for a great selection of tickling clips!

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Top