"Buyers guide" idea for bondage/foot sites with some tickling

[UnclStevel]

I had an idea about making a free monthly newsletter highlighting tickling material that is available on sites outside the community here. Picture a "buyers guide" catering to those who have the money, don't mind spending it, but want to know what they're paying for.

- What portion of the site is video/pics.
- How large is the members area. Number of clips/pic-galleries.
- approximate number of galleries/videos that include some tickling.
- How frequently is it updated, and what does an update usually include.
- How intense is the tickling on a scale of 1-5.
- Are clips specifically about tickling, or are they primarily bondage or foot-fetish oriented with tickling scattered throughout the clips.


What else should it include? Any other suggestions? Do you know of some sites that deserve a review? Would you like to be a reviewer? I'd want it to include only positive reviews because one man's trash is another man's treasure around here 😀

Throw around some ideas here if you think this would be a good idea!

Thanks,
Steve 🙂

 

[TklDuo-Ann]

Sounds like a great idea, Steve. The only things I can think of to add would be the price and a brief comment on how quickly the site loads and how dependable they are in their availability...timeouts, slow connections, bandwidth problems, etc. being noted.

You asked about if people want to do a review. Are you looking for people who already have memberships so they know what they're talking about? Just clarifying.

Ann

 

[Limeoutsider]

Maybe make one to list the sites that sell toys, too?

 

[TMF Jeff]

I think this is a great idea, I'll be happy to give a membership to you or your reviewer for this purpose Steve.

 

[UnclStevel]

Great ideas everyone!

Lime - Great idea, but not tickling-specific enough.

Ann - People who are members of the sites currently. By the way, how are Drew and yourself?

Jeff - Since this newsletter/thing would be catering to those who have it, and spend it, my first instinct would be to only accept reviews from folks who currently subscribe to a site. My theory revolves around classifying the two socioeconomic groups of ticklers.

The first category would be those who's time is too valuable to spend searching for tickling on bondage, or foot-fetish sites. They have money, the don't mind spending it, they want an honest review from someone who comes from their perspective.

What do I mean by "their perspective?" Some will join a site for $20.00/month just to see one 2 minute clip they *thought* may include some tickling. Even if it end up to be a lame scene, they won't loose sleep over the $20. They may not be satisfied, but they won't loose sleep.

To the other classification of ticklers, this seems absurd. They are satisfied with whatever is posted in the vid clip corner here for example (and some aren't that satisfied with those free clips.. go figure). They look at $20 (my hypothetical approx. avg. members site fees) much differently. As Seinfeld says, "and there's nothing wrong with that."

Think of how many times you look into the CCBill admin and see folks who subscribe to every site you own, and join the very second they can get access. These are the same folks who say, "I'll buy it as soon as you make it" and they mean it. Money isn't an obstacle for them - finding good tk stuff is.

I'll stop babbling. What your take?

Steve