Heres another one of mine, so I don't have to retype it:
"The hard thing in finding out or deciding whether Michael Jackson is innocent or guilty is that his mindset and actions themselves seem to border on complete, child-like innocence, and the calculating perversions of a pedophile who plays it safe and knows what he's doing. Its a very fine line thats been so blurred by different factors over the years.
He definitely has a Peter Pan complex, and approaching this from a psychological standpoint is just as important as any shred of evidence. I think what hurts him though, case wise, is that he has a fractured past and family history. Theres no way to say that this isn't all being manifested in his Peter Pan complex, and through that he is abusing these children both mentally and physically.
I believe Jackson BELIEVES whatever he has done with these children is ok even if it may not be in reality. I don't think he has any guilt for anything, therefore, because he sees his actions as clean, pure and just. What we would call sick, disturbing and unnecessary he sees as child-bonding.
Its no crime to LOVE children no matter what your age. Its what you do with that love that matters. I think mentally, he's twisted and introverted, selfish, delusional and immature when he's with children. He seems to make bad personal and professional decisions as well and isn't in control of his own fianances. He lives beyond his means and seems to be like a child whose allowance has been cut off.
I can't take him seriously as a mature adult enough to say he has been innocent every time or is now. I do however think he knows how to make the best out of a bad situation, whether its from the experience of past cases or because he really is guilty and simply finds loopholes everytime."