Feats of Promptsmanship -- F/f; Full Frontal Nudity

[sophilos]

I just had to drop a dumb foot pun into a thread which tickles none -- pardon my rhyme.

Coming off of an allnighter, I've learned a few things. I still have a lot to learn. For now, though, I hope you enjoy these.

 

[sophilos]

Just out of the blue, it occured to me that a vacant house might be just the place for a little private fun, like sorority initiations. See if you can spot the realty agent and sister emeritus.

These were made in a mode that reflects photography as it was three decades and further back. Think pre-digital and amateur. Natural daylight, a single bulb at night, automatic aperture/lens speed, and a photographer more interested in the model's exposure than the camera's.

Guilty here. I took the tradeoffs for the period models. Who doesn't love a "girl next door"?

 

[sophilos]

Don't count the fingers.

 

[Bdsmtickler]

Thanks for sharing!

Have to say some of the 'models' look almost comfortably young.

 

[sophilos]

Have to say some of the 'models' look almost comfortably young.

All models are over eighteen, period. I prompted "petite" and "slender". We all love Marilyn Monroe. But Audrey Hepburn -- there was a woman. JFK thought so.

That said, I know that websites must be careful and thorough. If you have to bring up Holly Hunter, Sabrina Carpenter, Ariana Grande or you-name-her, you're already backing into a corner.

In the spirit of good faith and community standards, point out the images your judgment tells you are borderline. I'll delete them, and I thank you for your honest input.

 

[Bdsmtickler]

I'll delete them,

I appreciate that, but it's fine with me.

 

[sophilos]

Large communities have large silent majorities. Once in a while, a diffident voice will venture to express some underlying concern. Any member would do well to heed that voice.

I have deleted two items and updated the title of the thread. I remain open to the honest concern of any member voice.