maverick83 said:
I quoted Hal here, because the beginning of his post pretty well describes how the part of my theory that deals with fate and free will begins. My opinion is that all causes are effects of other causes. This traces back to the initial incident, the first thing that ever happened, whatever you may believe it is. For me, this means the big bang (kind of, though I do seperate myself from that theory, ever so slightly), and that every incident, no matter how insignificant, that has ever occurred, was determined by the specific trajectories of the explosion's debris. Causes ramified exponentially into effects, and continue to do so, creating such a perfect illusion of free will that one may as well forget that all is predetermined. That is my opinion.
That is the stance taken by Stephen Hawking, as well. I, of course, tend to disagree (yes, it's ok to think the smartest man alive is wrong!)
🙂 Let me explain why. Cause and effect are the traditional logical results of a single-direction arrow of time - this event happens, so this event is then caused to happen, which then causes these future events, and so on. However, all such cause-effect relationships are, of necessity, self-referential. The information must be transmitted through time as well for it to be a true cause-effect relationship.
The most common example used for Chaos Theory is the act of rolling dough. When one makes dough, and then drops food colouring in, the specks of food colouring are in one position. When one then rolls the dough, the specks swirl around the dough. One can still, with difficulty, track back and see where they came from. However, if one kneads the dough again, they swirls move again. One can trace them back to their immediatly prior position, but all information regarding their still earlier position(s) is destroyed. This removes the traditional cause effect relationship, because the "Original Cause" isn't really a cause at all. Similar principles apply to weather systems and, I think, the Big Bang.
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle works on the microcosmic rather than macrocosmic level, yet it dictates an even greater degree of free will, particularly in a universe (such as ours) which is observer oriented (as per Schroedinger's cat, or the "If a tree falls in the forest" thought experiment). Without information transmission, there can be no cause-effect relationships and, thus, there can be no predetermination.