Now we are getting somewhere
I agree with separating Heritage from Nationality. If you are born in a country, you are from that country, e.g., German, Italian, French, German, Venezuelan, Ecuatorian, etc. Your long family history brings to the mix what your identity, ideals, morals, and customs are.
However, in every country there are people who could be White, Black, Indian, Asian or Arabic based on their heritage and beliefs. Does it make sense to "categorize" them. Not really, from my point of view. What do I care as a citizen to know that 25% of the population is of Arabic descent? If everybody is treated with the same dignity and respect, why would that make a difference?
However, we do need generic group identifiers for social conversation. If I see a guy with skin white as milk walking by, I should by able to refer to him a the White guy walking down the street. Why is that bad? Do I need to know that his family came from Ireland and that his great-grand mother was from Germany? Do I have to refer to him as the Irish-German-American guy?
Black people do not like to be called Negroes because that word was used in a disrespectful manner for a long time (even now). However, if the word was never used to insult anybody, do you think it would still have this negative stigma?
Referring to a Black person born in the United States as African-American does not make sense for two reasons:
1. They were not born in Africa.
2. There are white folks in Africa as well.
What is wrong with Black?
If you go to Spanish-speaking countries, the word used for people or darker color skin is "Negros", which is literally the name of the color. They are darker because they have African slaves blood in their veins, but they are by no means Africans. It would be the day when somebody would be called African-Venezuelan. Not in my lifetime, I hope.
And one more thing (just to stir things up a little), the United States is also known as America. Hence, citizens of this country are known as Americans. However, please consider the fact that many countries around the world do not see North and South America as two separate continents. For them, America is the whole American continent, which includes North, Central and South subdivisions. For those countries, American refers to any person born in any country in the America the continent.
Sadly enough, the English language does not provide a way to refer to people who are born in the United States of America the same way you do with other countries, e.g., Canadian, French, Italian, to name a few. In Spanish, the USA is known as "Estados Unidos de Norteamérica". Citizens of the USA are known as "Estadounidenses" or "Norteamericanos". Hence, it makes sense to talk about "Americanos" as people of "America" the continent.
You can never be perfectly PC. You will always piss somebody off. School and Family should be able able to make you understand that there are other countries and cultures around the world that have different customs. People should just accept the fact that this difference is the basis for civilization as we know it, and they should be able to accept that not everyone knows about you and your background. If I am from the Island of Borneo, I would not expect every one to know that it is formed by three independent nations (can you name them) 🙂. People should be able to interact with other people without the fear of insulting them due to ignorance. We should be able to treat people with dignity and respect regardless (both ways).
I just think that too much awereness and PC-like behavior is an invitation to prejudice.
Well, this got a little long.
Thanks for reading,
Knight Tickler