Is it just me?

[sexyfeline]

Or do A LOT of the tickling clips come across as trashy?

I mean, come on .. Do we really need to see a womens vagina while she is completely naked, tied down to a bed with another two naked ladies on top?

This is only my opinion here and i'm curious to find out others.

Normally when i see a clip that looks 'trashy' i will turn it off instantly.

I much prefer clothed women/men while they are being tickled.

I guess some skin isnt so bad

ie: bra's, shorts etc etc

But completely naked with legs ripped apart is just grosse for my liking.
It reminds me of a porno

Is porn classed as tickling?

It seems to be looking that way more and more

 

[prestidigits]

It's Just You

Or do A LOT of the tickling clips come across as trashy?

I mean, come on .. Do we really need to see a womens vagina while she is completely naked, tied down to a bed with another two naked ladies on top?

This is only my opinion here and i'm curious to find out others.

Normally when i see a clip that looks 'trashy' i will turn it off instantly.

I much prefer clothed women/men while they are being tickled.

I guess some skin isnt so bad

ie: bra's, shorts etc etc

But completely naked with legs ripped apart is just grosse for my liking.
It reminds me of a porno

Is porn classed as tickling?

It seems to be looking that way more and more

No, it isn't. But it reminds me of some very wonderful experiences, so I love it! Sorry.

 

[DLazarus]

No it isn't just you, but I do think the more skin that is available for tickling the better.

 

[slap'n'ticklee]

I sort of agree with you 🙂

There seems to be a deluge of women naked in clips, I don't mind a bikini or even topless but I think more than that does come across as a bit trashy, unless, its filmed in a tasteful way that doesn't come across as trashy.

Especially as the marjority of the clips are female lees and lers, I think its obvious that they are directed that way for quick sale as a lot of guys like girl/girl action.

 

[chode]

I think there is soemthing to be said for not giving it all away................Most of the time id rather wonder, and not just get it all right up front. KNow what i mean? It would be like sleeping with your gf on the first date, and then there is no build up to the event!

 

[giggle-maker]

I like clothing, but for a different reason. You can get nudity anywhere, but to have a girl dressed in a super-sexy outfit is soooo much better. I'm especialy that way with my foot fetish, that in actuality is a foot-shoe fetish. There are pics and clips of bare feet everywhere but if you have a girl in a pair of sexy shoes, it adds so much more cosmeticaly.

Imagine a girl sitting cross-leg and dangling a shoe on her toes giving you a picture-perfect view of the arch of her foot. Doesn't that inspire all sorts of imagined tickle-play?

 

[BigJim]

Personally, I love tickling clips where the lee is full clothed, except for her feet. I much prefer them to scantilly and dislike nude altogether. It detracts from the tickling to have bits and pieces hanging out all over the place.

 

[ftkl_haha]

I completely agree with BigJim, giggle-maker and sexyfeline.

I prefer the 'lee to have some kind of identity intact. It's sexier and tells a much more interesting story ... even if the only words are taunting, laughing and screaming. And a sexy outfit with a hot pair of discarded shoes sitting nearby adds SO much to the fantasy!

~FTKL

 

[huskys]

I must say I agree as well.
You can get porn nowdays from just about anywhere, and it does annoy me when tickling scenes get "hijacked" sometimes by introducing unecessary nudity.
Some of us are actually interested in the tickling part and don't need to be "bought" with anything else!!!

 

[drew70]

A agree with the foxy feline femme-fatale. I don't want to see genetalia. Let's just cover that shit right up, thank you very much. I think videos in which the women at least wear lingeree or some light tight clothes are much more sexy and classic than the trashy ones with gaping vaginas.

 

[Iggy pop]

I think we should have women tickled in full body armor. Make sure you keep those feet covered. Beautiful feet are great, but why not leave it to the imagination.

 

[BellaRisa]

I think we're forgetting all the folks, and there are many of them, who prefer their tickling to be as sexual as they can get it; for them that means nudity, exposed genitalia, etc. There's a reason those clips sell so well, and why so many of them exist; tickling clips ARE porn for many, many tk-clip consumers, it's as erotic for them as straight porn is for vanillas; they want their video ladies in just their bare ticklish skins with a good view of their girly bits because they love tickling 'and' they love the naked female form, and they really love them together . It's not my cup 'o tea but I definitely understand it

Bella

 

[vsa7a]

yeah you can get porn anywhere and when mixed with tickling detracts away the main interest of tickling. unfortunately there are many perverts who fetish and fantasize over virtually anything of porno material. we cant change their sexual nature. if you present a clip with just simple tickling theyll be like 'fuck this! i like fetish porn better!' theyre just at that lesser decent or unrealistic level and are more interested in wanking off.

 

[P[a]pi]

I agree with sexyfeline and everybody who agreed with her, especially ftkl_haha.

The only girl I need to see naked or in a bra/panties is my girlfriend. If she ain't mine, then I don't care and I usually get disgusted. Private areas without love is nothing to me.

 

[Mostly Harmless]

The only girl I need to see naked or in a bra/panties is my girlfriend. If she ain't mine, then I don't care and I usually get disgusted.

Good said.
I'm just trying to avoid producers who make "porn"-tickling. Fortunately, there's not many of them (or am I just missing their ads?)

 

[Red_Baron]

I don't mind the complete nudity, but the tickling and the responses seem fake to me in most videos. Real tickling isn't rough or just squeezing and flopping fingers all over, basically just copping a feel. It is perhaps erotic to be fondled and poked, but when somebody is well and truly being tickled, it looks and sounds unmistakably real and different--Much more erotic--There is real drama, turn-on, desperation, non-inhabition and "abandonment of all hope" of relief from the overwhelming experience, even tho this is done with extreme gentleness and sensitivity. Just my two cents worth.

 

[prestidigits]

..and furthermore...

No it isn't just you, but I do think the more skin that is available for tickling the better.

I had a girlfriend who learned (with my help) that being tickled made her horny. She didn't see any point in being tickled if she had clothes on.

I miss her!

 

[BorisandNatasha]

Or do A LOT of the tickling clips come across as trashy?

I mean, come on .. Do we really need to see a womens vagina while she is completely naked, tied down to a bed with another two naked ladies on top?

This is only my opinion here and i'm curious to find out others.

Normally when i see a clip that looks 'trashy' i will turn it off instantly.

I much prefer clothed women/men while they are being tickled.

I guess some skin isnt so bad

ie: bra's, shorts etc etc

But completely naked with legs ripped apart is just grosse for my liking.
It reminds me of a porno

Is porn classed as tickling?

It seems to be looking that way more and more

Oh I so agree with you! It is porn with tickling . Perhaps it is to take the attention away from the fact that the girl being tickled is not really that ticklish to begin with.

I agree with every word you said.
As far as on line tickling material goes.

With my Natasha...the less she is wearing the better.
More to tickle.

Also, I have noticed in the past that if you put tickling in a search engine, you will get tickling material and websites but you will also get a crap load of porn guised under the heading of tickling.

Very sad but just as very true.


Boris

 

[prestidigits]

You say "porn" like it's a bad thing!

 

[BigJim]

If I could see a tickling video that progressed to sex, then I'd find the nudity appropriate and fun I think. With "normal" tickling videos, I like to project myself into the ler's place and it's difficult to imagine me meeting someone from the community in a hotel room and her getting her kit off.

 

[sexyfeline]

I like clothing, but for a different reason. You can get nudity anywhere, but to have a girl dressed in a super-sexy outfit is soooo much better. I'm especialy that way with my foot fetish, that in actuality is a foot-shoe fetish. There are pics and clips of bare feet everywhere but if you have a girl in a pair of sexy shoes, it adds so much more cosmeticaly.

Imagine a girl sitting cross-leg and dangling a shoe on her toes giving you a picture-perfect view of the arch of her foot. Doesn't that inspire all sorts of imagined tickle-play?

couldnt have said it better myself

 

[SpiffyTickler]

I think the models should be wrapped in body-sized condoms, and the tickling should only be suggested in order to leave the model’s reactions up to the viewer’s imagination. The videos shouldn’t be recordings of the session itself, but a slideshow of sketches done of the session, drawn by dolphins.

Anything less and we're left with something tantamount to porn.

 

[vsa7a]

bottom line: more skin available for tickling the better. anything that pertains to sex or sex toys ie naked genitalia, vibrator, etc or anything of faddish or general porno material is no longer tickling. instead it is porn and that is it.

tickling by itself=tickling

tickling+porn=porn (NOT tickling!)

 

[Iggy pop]

You argue about the defintion of porn forever. Is a naked woman pornographic? Or do you have to actually have penetration?

But let's face it, the material here is for the same reason to provide sexual stimulation. When people talk about sexy, hot, feet, they are talking about feet in sexual terms. Feet turn them on, makes them sport wood, gives them a chubby, you get the picture.

Yes, I know there is tickling out there that has nothing to do with sexuality and is totally innocent. The most common form of tickling is between parents and their young children. However, that material is not here and it is not here for a reason.

Now, I understand some people may find that a vagina may distract them from their foot fethish fantasy, and I understand that. There is material out there for you. Some people, however, do like looking at vaginas and find them sexy, and there is nothing wrong with that. By the way, sometimes those vaginas can be pretty ticklish. Now I know some people are going to say that they still find it "trashy." There is nothing I can do to change that. Just like there are people that think the fetish of the foot is "weird" and "abnormal" and there is nothing you can do to change that.

As for nudity being found elsewhere, that is true, but finding naked tickling elsewhere is a little hard to come by. Also, we have foot fetish stuff here that has absolutely no tickling content what so ever, and that can definitely be found other places. Yet, that is still here.

You know there is stuff on this forum I don't care for. For example, there is anime clip, which in my opinion look like little kids. I don't look at it and move onto other things I do enjoy. You know this adult website, and I thought this would be one place where you wouldn't have prudes calling you perverted for liking to look at vaginas, but it looks like I may be wrong about that.

 

[Capnmad]

Here's my take...

We're not going to find an absolute consensus on this. Everyone has their preferences.

Myself, I like variety. Nude or clothed, tied or un-, trying out toys or just using fingers, playful, erotic or "torturous"... I try not to limit myself.

What I will say is this: There should be a point to nudity. When I undress a woman or have her undress herself, there's always a reason. Sometimes, that reason may be as small as drawing her -- no contact involved -- but there's still a reason.

If you're making a tickling video, your goal should be to make a tickling video. That is your reason. Everything done in that video should be in service to that goal. If you expose flesh somewhere, you should spend significant time tickling it. Not a revolutionary concept, I hope.

Imagine Emeril Lagasse pausing in the middle of his show to hold up a spice and point out to the audience, "This is nutmeg!", only to immediately move on, never use it in the dish or for the rest of the show.

You'd wonder, "What the Hell was that about?"

Similarly a tickling video producer shouldn't take off a 'lee's socks only to say, "Nice feet", and never touch them, or take off their underthings to say, "Oh -- you've got one of those, too. Just like roughly half the population", and pay it no mind after.


Simply, my suggestion to producers would be:

If there is no utility to doing something, do not do it. Otherwise, the rest of us wonder why you bothered.