• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • Check out Tickling.com - the most innovative tickling site of the year.
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Last Laugh Gyfu 7: Dayne's Feet Get Licked And Tickled (FFF/F) + Complete Series

The Last Laugh

3rd Level Green Feather
Joined
Apr 21, 2001
Messages
4,588
Points
38
Hello everyone!

The 7th and final part of the LAST LAUGH GYFU series is available on my store. There's also a Complete Series clip that combines all 7 parts.

"We've made a few changes since the previous scene. Dayne's ankles have been moved from the stocks' central holes to the side ones. Her big toes are still pulled back by toes cuffs, though. Her wrists are now cuffed in the central holes, pulling her torso and face closer to the stocks. Maybe she was a bit cold because she's now wearing a sweater. Xena and Kitt have traded places, with Xena on the upper body and Kitt on the right foot. Finally, as has become the norm for this series, Dayne's second scene in the stocks is now mostly about her getting her soles and toes licked and sucked by two of her friends while the third one teases her upper body.

This new oral approach is apparently just as effective on Dayne as finger tickling. Halfway through the scene I instruct Xena to join her partners. She sits on the floor off-camera, then reaches up with her hands to tickle both feet. When Dayne realizes that her poor feet are now being worked over by three people at the same time, she declares "Oh, that's evil!"

Dayne: 21: 5'7", size 7.5
Xena: 20, 5'6", size 7
Kitt: 21: 5'9", size 9.5
Leah: 22, 5'5", size 7.5

__________

While I'm here I'd like to mention that I've also released all 5 parts of the LAST LAUGH FEET 27 series, starring Aliss and Lory. A "Complete Series" clip is also available. You can learn more about the various clips by clicking on the links below (descriptions, pictures and preview clips). Generally speaking the series includes one scene in with both models show off their soles, two scenes in which Aliss licks Lory's feet and 2 scenes in which Aliss self-worships her own feet. There's even a bit of tickling in clips 4 and 5, but it's very brief and very light.

Lory: 21, 5'5", size 6.5
Aliss: 27, 5'7", size 10

__________

As for the LAST LAUGH CEN series, the reason why I've included links to its various parts in this post is simply that it's my second most recent tickling series after Last Laugh Gyfu.

Mac: 23, 5'1", size 5
Ruby: 19, 5'4", size 7
Leah: 29, 5'4', size 8.5

__________

<font size="+1">LAST LAUGH GYFU SERIES PREVIEWS:</font>

<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22619215">LAST LAUGH GYFU 1</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22654179">LAST LAUGH GYFU 2</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22655185">LAST LAUGH GYFU 3</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22682235">LAST LAUGH GYFU 4</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22682515">LAST LAUGH GYFU 5</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22691223">LAST LAUGH GYFU 6</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22691229">LAST LAUGH GYFU 7</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22691797">LAST LAUGH GYFU - COMPLETE SERIES</a></font>

__________

<font size="+1">LAST LAUGH FEET 27 SERIES PREVIEWS:</font>

<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22101067">LAST LAUGH FEET 27-1</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22511497">LAST LAUGH FEET 27-2</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22704855">LAST LAUGH FEET 27-3</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22704859">LAST LAUGH FEET 27-4</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22704865">LAST LAUGH FEET 27-5</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22705255">LAST LAUGH FEET 27 - COMPLETE SERIES</a></font>

__________

<font size="+1">LAST LAUGH CEN SERIES PREVIEWS:</font>

<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22504017">LAST LAUGH CEN 1</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22510623">LAST LAUGH CEN 2</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22514945">LAST LAUGH CEN 3</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22519983">LAST LAUGH CEN 4</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22545121">LAST LAUGH CEN 5</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22551677">LAST LAUGH CEN 6</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22552671">LAST LAUGH CEN - COMPLETE SERIES</a></font>
 

Attachments

  • llgyfu7.jpg
    llgyfu7.jpg
    928.5 KB · Views: 431
  • llgyfu_0.jpg
    llgyfu_0.jpg
    269.2 KB · Views: 309
Last edited:
Ah, too bad. Well at least the other 3 made for excellent ticklees!

Indeed. I'm actually lucky that 3 out of 4 of the girls were as ticklish are they were. And Leah turned out to be a perfectly decent tickler.
 
What a shame, in retrospect even a mediocre ticklee is good enough on my book is she is good-looking enough. I already said that in that post about the hot - but not that ticklish chicks
 
What a shame, in retrospect even a mediocre ticklee is good enough on my book is she is good-looking enough. I already said that in that post about the hot - but not that ticklish chicks

I understand. But it's been made quite clear to me that not everyone shares your opinion. A few years ago I posted a thread about a shoot that I did in which the models weren't the most reactive ticklees. In particular, one of them didn't laugh out loud or even giggled much, though you could still see from her body language that she was indeed ticklish and that it was getting to her. I was disappointed, but both models looked pretty cute (I was especially fond the the non-laughing one), and I thought it would be a shame not to release the footage, as I figured some might enjoy it anyway, if only to see pretty models get their bare feet tickled. Better that than just let the footage go waste, right? I mean, I did pay for it.

That being said, I wasn't entirely convinced, so I posted the thread to ask for opinions. Well, a number of people had negative reactions, in some cases to the point of claiming that releasing the footage might severely damage my reputation, somehow. I didn't believe it would be nearly that bad, and these opinions were based on very little since no footage was available at the time. But I wasn't exactly happy that some people cleary thought I was being kinda stupid and/or naive for even considering the option of using the footage. The thread kept getting occasional replies for a year or two, until I got tired of people making assumptions about the footage and posted a short sample to show what it was really like. The replies I got after that were more or less like "Oh, that's not half bad, actually. Not great, but here's no harm in releasing that". I can't deny that I felt a little vindicated. Which is a bit weird, since I initially had some doubts about the footage myself.

In any case, considering the original replies the thread got, you'll understand that I'm sometimes hesitant to release clips featuring so-so tickling. Mind you, I do release what could be considered sub-optimal tickling clips if I feel there's still a certain charm to them. But I'm also painfully aware that, while some of the models I've worked with are very ticklish, on average they can't compare to the models some of the larger, more popular producers hire for their videos. Over the years, tickling clip buyers have become used to to a certain level of ticklishness and reactions. They've seen it all. So sometimes it can be a little intimidating to release videos featuring models that are only mildly to moderately ticklish.

In Leah's case, as far as I remember she wasn't just a mediocre ticklee. She simply wasn't ticklish at all, or barely so. The best we could have done would have been some kind of foot fetish scene to show off her feet.
 
I understand. But it's been made quite clear to me that not everyone shares your opinion. A few years ago I posted a thread about a shoot that I did in which the models weren't the most reactive ticklees. In particular, one of them didn't laugh out loud or even giggled much, though you could still see from her body language that she was indeed ticklish and that it was getting to her. I was disappointed, but both models looked pretty cute (I was especially fond the the non-laughing one), and I thought it would be a shame not to release the footage, as I figured some might enjoy it anyway, if only to see pretty models get their bare feet tickled. Better that than just let the footage go waste, right? I mean, I did pay for it.

That being said, I wasn't entirely convinced, so I posted the thread to ask for opinions. Well, a number of people had negative reactions, in some cases to the point of claiming that releasing the footage might severely damage my reputation, somehow. I didn't believe it would be nearly that bad, and these opinions were based on very little since no footage was available at the time. But I wasn't exactly happy that some people cleary thought I was being kinda stupid and/or naive for even considering the option of using the footage. The thread kept getting occasional replies for a year or two, until I got tired of people making assumptions about the footage and posted a short sample to show what it was really like. The replies I got after that were more or less like "Oh, that's not half bad, actually. Not great, but here's no harm in releasing that". I can't deny that I felt a little vindicated. Which is a bit weird, since I initially had some doubts about the footage myself.

In any case, considering the original replies the thread got, you'll understand that I'm sometimes hesitant to release clips featuring so-so tickling. Mind you, I do release what could be considered sub-optimal tickling clips if I feel there's still a certain charm to them. But I'm also painfully aware that, while some of the models I've worked with are very ticklish, on average they can't compare to the models some of the larger, more popular producers hire for their videos. Over the years, tickling clip buyers have become used to to a certain level of ticklishness and reactions. They've seen it all. So sometimes it can be a little intimidating to release videos featuring models that are only mildly to moderately ticklish.

In Leah's case, as far as I remember she wasn't just a mediocre ticklee. She simply wasn't ticklish at all, or barely so. The best we could have done would have been some kind of foot fetish scene to show off her feet.

I remember the thread quite well, I was (am) actually one of the most interested in watching that shoot. It actually looked pretty good.

As for the models who are only very mildly ticklish, I enjoyed what you did in Last Laugh Dagaz. The second girl was barely ticklish, but she did have a very brief scene right at the end in the stocks, enough to show a tiny bit of tickling but being clear that she wasn't going to be really part of the shoot as she was not sensitive enough.

I would love to see scenes like that at the end of the real videos with the girls that where not ticklees themselves. A tease really.
 
I remember the thread quite well, I was (am) actually one of the most interested in watching that shoot. It actually looked pretty good.

You might remember that, in that thread, I suggested that the models' looks were a factor (but not the only one) in my thinking that the footage might be worth releasing, and that someone shot that down as a terrible argument. Of course I don't think looks are everything, far from it. But while ticklishness, reactions and model chemistry are more important factors overall, let's face it, good looks don't hurt. Thing is, I figured that it would be a waste not to use fairly expensive footage that features 1) two cute models, 2) vulnerable bare feet locked in stocks and 3) tickling action that results in at least some level of giggling. But that person I mentioned seemed to think I intended to release the footage based entirely on the models' looks, with nothing else going for them. I won't lie to you, that comment ticked me off.

In case you're wondering, I actually do intend to release that footage eventually. It's only two relatively short scenes, so they won't require much of my time. And I really don't think they'll "damage my reputation", as some people have suggested.

As for the models who are only very mildly ticklish, I enjoyed what you did in Last Laugh Dagaz. The second girl was barely ticklish, but she did have a very brief scene right at the end in the stocks, enough to show a tiny bit of tickling but being clear that she wasn't going to be really part of the shoot as she was not sensitive enough.

Oh yeah, I forgot that I included that bit at the end of the Complete Series clip for Dagaz. It seemed like a good way to use it. It had very little impact on the clip's overall content, and no impact at all on the price, so why not? It would be a different story if I included it at the end of a more standard 5-10 minute clip, though.

I have to say, I'm a bit puzzled. Are you saying that Katy is barely ticklish in that short segment? Her reactions seem fine to me. Quite frankly, had she remained that reactive we would definitely had done a full scene with her. It's only *after* that segment that her ticklishness suddently decreased to an unusable level (which is why I didn't release that part at all). It's not a big deal, but i wouldn't want you to think that the footage you saw is my definition of "not ticklish enough for a commercial clip".
 
Last Laugh Feet 27: Aliss And Lory's Feet (Worship And Self-Worship) Complete Series

This isn't a tickling series, but while I'm here in my own thread I'd like to mention that I've released all 5 parts of the Last Laugh Feet 27 series, starring Aliss and Lory. A "Complete Series" clip is also available.

You can learn more about the various clips by clicking on the links below, but the series includes one scene in with both models show off their soles, two scenes in which Aliss licks Lory's feet and 2 scenes in which Aliss self-worships her own feet. Scenes 4 and 5 each feature a little bit of very light, playful tickling, but remain almost entirely about foot licking.

Lory: 21, 5'5", size 6.5
Aliss: 27, 5'7", size 10


<font size="+1">LAST LAUGH FEET 27 SERIES DESCRIPTIONS AND PREVIEWS PREVIEWS:</font>

<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22101067">LAST LAUGH FEET 27-1</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22511497">LAST LAUGH FEET 27-2</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22704855">LAST LAUGH FEET 27-3</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22704859">LAST LAUGH FEET 27-4</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22704865">LAST LAUGH FEET 27-5</a></font>
<font size="+1"><a href="http://www.clips4sale.com/728/22705255">LAST LAUGH FEET 27 - COMPLETE SERIES</a></font>
 

Attachments

  • llfeet27-1.jpg
    llfeet27-1.jpg
    1,003.5 KB · Views: 22
  • llfeet27-2.jpg
    llfeet27-2.jpg
    1 MB · Views: 17
  • llfeet27-3.jpg
    llfeet27-3.jpg
    1,015.1 KB · Views: 15
  • llfeet27-4.jpg
    llfeet27-4.jpg
    883.6 KB · Views: 18
  • llfeet27-5.jpg
    llfeet27-5.jpg
    1,021 KB · Views: 25
You might remember that, in that thread, I suggested that the models' looks were a factor (but not the only one) in my thinking that the footage might be worth releasing, and that someone shot that down as a terrible argument. Of course I don't think looks are everything, far from it. But while ticklishness, reactions and model chemistry are more important factors overall, let's face it, good looks don't hurt. Thing is, I figured that it would be a waste not to use fairly expensive footage that features 1) two cute models, 2) vulnerable bare feet locked in stocks and 3) tickling action that results in at least some level of giggling. But that person I mentioned seemed to think I intended to release the footage based entirely on the models' looks, with nothing else going for them. I won't lie to you, that comment ticked me off.

In case you're wondering, I actually do intend to release that footage eventually. It's only two relatively short scenes, so they won't require much of my time. And I really don't think they'll "damage my reputation", as some people have suggested.



Oh yeah, I forgot that I included that bit at the end of the Complete Series clip for Dagaz. It seemed like a good way to use it. It had very little impact on the clip's overall content, and no impact at all on the price, so why not? It would be a different story if I included it at the end of a more standard 5-10 minute clip, though.

I have to say, I'm a bit puzzled. Are you saying that Katy is barely ticklish in that short segment? Her reactions seem fine to me. Quite frankly, had she remained that reactive we would definitely had done a full scene with her. It's only *after* that segment that her ticklishness suddently decreased to an unusable level (which is why I didn't release that part at all). It's not a big deal, but i wouldn't want you to think that the footage you saw is my definition of "not ticklish enough for a commercial clip".

I can't remember exactly but I recall that she does have some good reactions at first, but she losses them nearly completely after getting the toe ties. Still, my main point is that that tiny section was quite nice, even if it was short. You've recently released several videos with at least one not ticklish or not ticklish enough girl that didn't get any action. If they're even very mildy sensitive, ide love to see a few seconds in the stocks like that.
 
You might remember that, in that thread, I suggested that the models' looks were a factor (but not the only one) in my thinking that the footage might be worth releasing, and that someone shot that down as a terrible argument. Of course I don't think looks are everything, far from it. But while ticklishness, reactions and model chemistry are more important factors overall, let's face it, good looks don't hurt. Thing is, I figured that it would be a waste not to use fairly expensive footage that features 1) two cute models, 2) vulnerable bare feet locked in stocks and 3) tickling action that results in at least some level of giggling. But that person I mentioned seemed to think I intended to release the footage based entirely on the models' looks, with nothing else going for them. I won't lie to you, that comment ticked me off.

In case you're wondering, I actually do intend to release that footage eventually. It's only two relatively short scenes, so they won't require much of my time. And I really don't think they'll "damage my reputation", as some people have suggested.



Oh yeah, I forgot that I included that bit at the end of the Complete Series clip for Dagaz. It seemed like a good way to use it. It had very little impact on the clip's overall content, and no impact at all on the price, so why not? It would be a different story if I included it at the end of a more standard 5-10 minute clip, though.

I have to say, I'm a bit puzzled. Are you saying that Katy is barely ticklish in that short segment? Her reactions seem fine to me. Quite frankly, had she remained that reactive we would definitely had done a full scene with her. It's only *after* that segment that her ticklishness suddently decreased to an unusable level (which is why I didn't release that part at all). It's not a big deal, but i wouldn't want you to think that the footage you saw is my definition of "not ticklish enough for a commercial clip".

I can't remember exactly but I recall that she does have some good reactions at first, but she losses them nearly completely after getting the toe ties. Still, my main point is that that tiny section was quite nice, even if it was short. You've recently released several videos with at least one not ticklish or not ticklish enough girl that didn't get any action. If they're even very mildy sensitive, ide love to see a few seconds in the stocks like that.
 
I can't remember exactly but I recall that she does have some good reactions at first, but she losses them nearly completely after getting the toe ties.

Technically we never get to see her with the toe cuffs on. It's true that she reacts very little to the tickling after the second shoe and sock are removed, but that bit lasts for about 3 seconds, so it doesn't really give a clear idea of how ticklish she was at that point. But ultimately it doesn't matter since she didn't get any better after we tried with the cuffs on.

You've recently released several videos with at least one not ticklish or not ticklish enough girl that didn't get any action. If they're even very mildy sensitive, ide love to see a few seconds in the stocks like that.

I don't know if many people would care to see a few seconds of a girl reacting just a bit. But then again, I didn't include the part with Katy for the tickling itself. I did it to give people a chance to see her feet. That's why I also included a short segment with her and Narciss just posing with their feet in the stocks. Not saying that I'll never add a little bonus at the end of a Complete Series clip again if I have worthwhile footage, but it won't happen very often.

Something I should point out is that, if a model turns out not to be ticklish enough during the tests, I usually don't bother even trying to do a scene with her. Preparing a scene is time consuming, and I can only keep the models at my place for so long. I also don't film the tests. So in most cases I simply don't have any footage of models that don't react enough, even if they do laugh a little.

Katy's case is an exception because the tests indicated that she had some decent potential. Enough that we gave it a try. She unfortunately very quickly lost whatever ticklishness she had, for some reason, but I did get to film a bit of it. That's why I have a bit of footage of her getting tickled. It doesn't happen very often.

I'm sorry to say that, if you have a strong preference for team shoots in which all models get tickled, you might be disappointed with future series, at least for a while. The next three series will be solo shoots, meaning that they'll only feature one model each and I take care of the tickling myself. After that will come several series with two models but in which only one gets tickled. It seems I got somewhat unlucky with the candidates' ticklishness for a while, there. That being said, I feel that a shoot with one ticklee and one tickler is better than no shoot at all.
 
Technically we never get to see her with the toe cuffs on. It's true that she reacts very little to the tickling after the second shoe and sock are removed, but that bit lasts for about 3 seconds, so it doesn't really give a clear idea of how ticklish she was at that point. But ultimately it doesn't matter since she didn't get any better after we tried with the cuffs on.



I don't know if many people would care to see a few seconds of a girl reacting just a bit. But then again, I didn't include the part with Katy for the tickling itself. I did it to give people a chance to see her feet. That's why I also included a short segment with her and Narciss just posing with their feet in the stocks. Not saying that I'll never add a little bonus at the end of a Complete Series clip again if I have worthwhile footage, but it won't happen very often.

Something I should point out is that, if a model turns out not to be ticklish enough during the tests, I usually don't bother even trying to do a scene with her. Preparing a scene is time consuming, and I can only keep the models at my place for so long. I also don't film the tests. So in most cases I simply don't have any footage of models that don't react enough, even if they do laugh a little.

Katy's case is an exception because the tests indicated that she had some decent potential. Enough that we gave it a try. She unfortunately very quickly lost whatever ticklishness she had, for some reason, but I did get to film a bit of it. That's why I have a bit of footage of her getting tickled. It doesn't happen very often.

I'm sorry to say that, if you have a strong preference for team shoots in which all models get tickled, you might be disappointed with future series, at least for a while. The next three series will be solo shoots, meaning that they'll only feature one model each and I take care of the tickling myself. After that will come several series with two models but in which only one gets tickled. It seems I got somewhat unlucky with the candidates' ticklishness for a while, there. That being said, I feel that a shoot with one ticklee and one tickler is better than no shoot at all.

Not at all, I for example enjoy several models in the same series, but if it's a loner, it's fine. One would just wish that every model in a group series would be sensitive.

Just out of curiosity, over all these years, has there not been any model in a series that you initially discarded and that as of today you have reconsidered they're usefulness?
 
Not at all, I for example enjoy several models in the same series, but if it's a loner, it's fine. One would just wish that every model in a group series would be sensitive.

I wish the same thing. But in practice it's not that easy to pull off.

One might think that candidates would make absolutely sure that they're of an acceptable level of ticklishness before applying for a tickling video. But it can be rather subjective and hard to evaluate, especially for the candidates. They often overestimate how ticklish they are, possibly basing it on past experiences with typically very short surprise attacks that are very different from a commercial video shoot. They also tend to understimate how ticklish a model needs should be to be considered "very" or "extremely" ticklish in this market, where customers have already seen tons of videos with hyper-ticklish models and expect more than "just laughing a bit for a few moments". Finally, even if a candidate is genuinely very ticklish in everyday life, it doesn't mean it will be the case under the specific circumstances of a tickling fetish video shoot. After all, tickling is a very psychological phenomenon that can be affected by a variety of factors. So even candidates with excellent potential can turn out to be duds when we try doing a shoot. Or they can start great but get desensitized very quickly.

Now, considering how tricky finding even one truly ticklish model can be, you can imagine that teams aren't any easier. The more models in a team, the higher the chances of at least one of them not being ticklish enough. Which is why series with teams of models that don't all get tickled are fairly common. It sucks for people who are really into revenge tickling, but there's only so much I can do about it.

Of course, one could argue that I could simply be more strict with my selection process. I could just reject models that aren't ticklish enough. Which I often do, to tell the truth (even though I find it a tough decision to make when candidates are kind of borderline when it comes to ticklishness, which is unfortunately quite common). But with teams of friends it would be awkward to hire one model who's ticklish enough but reject her friend who isn't. I'm likely to just lose both of them. So I often decide to hire the second model as a dedicated tickler.

Just out of curiosity, over all these years, has there not been any model in a series that you initially discarded and that as of today you have reconsidered they're usefulness?

I'm not quite sure what you mean. I'm assuming you mean a series that I've released that includes a model whose value as a ticklee turned out to be debatable and who doesn't get tickled in the final product. But which specific scenario are you asking about?:

1) we gave the so-so ticklish model a try, filmed the scene, but I ultimately decided not to use it, only to regret my decision later
2) we didn't bother to do a scene with the so-so ticklish model and I later regretted not giving her a chance
 
I'm not quite sure what you mean. I'm assuming you mean a series that I've released that includes a model whose value as a ticklee turned out to be debatable and who doesn't get tickled in the final product. But which specific scenario are you asking about?:

1) we gave the so-so ticklish model a try, filmed the scene, but I ultimately decided not to use it, only to regret my decision later
2) we didn't bother to do a scene with the so-so ticklish model and I later regretted not giving her a chance[/QUOTE]

I'd go with opción 1) on that
 
I'm not quite sure what you mean. I'm assuming you mean a series that I've released that includes a model whose value as a ticklee turned out to be debatable and who doesn't get tickled in the final product. But which specific scenario are you asking about?:

1) we gave the so-so ticklish model a try, filmed the scene, but I ultimately decided not to use it, only to regret my decision later
2) we didn't bother to do a scene with the so-so ticklish model and I later regretted not giving her a chance

I'd go with opción 1) on that

That's a very rare situation. Going to the trouble of preparing and filming a scene with a model, then not using her footage when I release the series, is a rather important decision that I don't make lightly. If I do that it's almost always because the best course of action was pretty obvious, so I don't have any reason to regret it or reverse it.

One example does come to mind, though: Last Laugh Isa. It stars three models: Jade, Frederique and Nicky. We did five scenes and I was quite pleased with the experience. But when I later reviewed the footage I was disappointed. Part of the reason is technical. Among other factors, it was my first time using that particular camcorder (which I'm still using to this day) and I feel I messed up the lighting and audio even more than usual. But there's also the fact that some of the models' reactions weren't quite as satisfying as I first thought. Not super bad, but not as regular as I thought. And the audio quality only made things worse. Enough that, when I released the series I only uploaded one scene, with Jade as the ticklee. I dropped the other four for various reasons. That's two rejected ticklees out of three. Not a pleasant turn of events at all.

After that I occasionally wondered if that unused footage might be worth releasing after all. After going back and forth a few times I finally decided to release the whole thing so that people could see Frederique and Nicky get tickled too. Last Laugh Isa 2, 3, 4 and 5 became a thing. I still feel like Last Laugh Isa 1 is easily the high point of the series, but I also think that I did well to reverse my initial decision and offer the rest for sale. It doesn't mean those clips sold especially well, mind you, but I think they have enough charm to be of interest to at least some people.

If you're wondering if there are other potential cases of this, like I have similar unreleased footage that I might consider using in the future after deciding there's something to it after all, then no, I don't think there are. I mean, if I don't use footage that I worked and paid for it's almost always because I'm confident it's not worth it.

One thing to consider is the fact that turning raw footage into commercial clips, as well as creating the relevant promotional material (descriptions, pictures and preview clips), takes a lot of time and effort. I might think a discarded scene or shoot might be interesting to a few people, but it doesn't mean I think it's worth the trouble of actually making it happen. I'm much more likely to decide that it's time better spent on better material.
 
What's New

2/8/2025
Curious about your favorite Celebrities ticklishness? Visit the Ticklish Celebrities sub forum and see if they are listed!
Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top