let me know what you think

[its time]

I just watched the clip on tickling emporium gassed and tickled. I noticed that the women that they gas looks just like the hooker from the non consensual tickling clip from fp. That clip was so messed up I felt bad for that girl. If that is her it might have been consented. Let me know what you think. If this is in the wrong section I am sorry.

 

[Celtic_Emperor]

I think it is in the wrong section. But on the subject itself, it has to be consentual lest the company run the chance of being sued by her or reported by a customer.

 

[RottingLies]

Yep def the wrong section for this. It should be in the tickling discussion section

 

[Celtic_Emperor]

Yeah, although the topic itself could be discussed here either way.

 

[MistressValerie1]

Moved to Tickling Discussion 🙂

I agree with Vlad: one cannot legally produce or distribute a genuine non-consensual video because it would be lacking the required age verification and modelling releases, not to mention that it would be taped evidence of indecent assault that could send the producers to prison. I can't imagine any sane person taking that kind of legal risk to make a video.

 

[TickledToDeath]

I don't think it was the girl from the first (if not only) non con vid from FP.
Furthermore, I seriously doubt that there are truly NON consensual vids out there produced by professional companies for the reasons given in this thread and other reprocussions taken by the "offended" parties.

TTD

 

[its time]

I agree

the only thing I was saying was that it looks alot like her. As for then tape itself she was a hooker that they asked to do bondage and then tickle tortured her. They then gave her alot of money so she wouldnt call the cops. I just thought it would have been funny if it turned out to be Bull----. Thanks for the reply and thanks for moving the post to the right forum.