• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Nature's sense of humor



Heh. That's interesting to me also for the fact that they are a member of the tomato-family and deadly poisonous. I read a true tale once about a fellow who went around America in the early years, eating tomatoes to convince people that they were safe to imbibe. I see from this that there may have been some precedent for folks to believe that they might get sick from it.
 
Heh. That's interesting to me also for the fact that they are a member of the tomato-family and deadly poisonous. I read a true tale once about a fellow who went around America in the early years, eating tomatoes to convince people that they were safe to imbibe. I see from this that there may have been some precedent for folks to believe that they might get sick from it.

Actually, Rick, Tomatoes are poisonous. But they are only poisonous in the leaves and stem leading up to the fruit. A very potent poison can be made from it.
 
Actually, Rick, Tomatoes are poisonous. But they are only poisonous in the leaves and stem leading up to the fruit. A very potent poison can be made from it.

Of course! The killer fed the victim pizza made with killer tomato sauce!
 
Actually, Rick, Tomatoes are poisonous. But they are only poisonous in the leaves and stem leading up to the fruit. A very potent poison can be made from it.

Speaking of poisons, assuming that after I died I was reincarnated as a little human girl whose mother died during childbirth and whose father became alcoholic from the grief and then severally abusive? Now assume I could conceal the fact that I took out a $3,000,000 life insurance policy on him that didn't require his signature. The question basically is (and forgive me if this sounds dark) what poison would work the best and be the least detectable (assuming the technology doesn't change much) to kill daddy dearest with by putting it in his wine glass?
 
Speaking of poisons, assuming that after I died I was reincarnated as a little human girl whose mother died during childbirth and whose father became alcoholic from the grief and then severally abusive? Now assume I could conceal the fact that I took out a $3,000,000 life insurance policy on him that didn't require his signature. The question basically is (and forgive me if this sounds dark) what poison would work the best and be the least detectable (assuming the technology doesn't change much) to kill daddy dearest with by putting it in his wine glass?

Anti-freeze. Once it enters the blood it can't leave and once enough has entered it's deadly poisonous. So it all comes down to how much you want to place in said wine glass at a time, about a half syringe or so per glass should have him sickly and then dead in about a year or so. Hypotheticaly speaking of course.
 
Anti-freeze. Once it enters the blood it can't leave and once enough has entered it's deadly poisonous. So it all comes down to how much you want to place in said wine glass at a time, about a half syringe or so per glass should have him sickly and then dead in about a year or so. Hypotheticaly speaking of course.

What good is that insurance money when you're in jail? :stickout
 
What good is that insurance money when you're in jail?

Assuming I was stupid enough NOT TO dispose of the antifreeze, the glass it was used, and anything else incriminating by throwing it all in a weighted bag into the Hudson? :stickout
 
Rox_My_Sox: Use arsenic. Odorless, tasteless, and quickly degradable. Unable to be traced in autopsies.

I did not give you this idea, by the way!
 
Rox_My_Sox: Use arsenic. Odorless, tasteless, and quickly degradable. Unable to be traced in autopsies.

Hmmm...that might be a problem to acquire if I was only, say, a little girl. Where does one acquire arsenic anyway? I thought the only people who use it are terrorists and stuff.

I did not give you this idea, by the way!

I see nutkin!

I know nutkin!

^_~

remind me never to make Rox angry 😉

LOL. No worries Queenbee. I'm not a murderer. I was just curious because sometimes I dream about being a little girl and being beaten by a father I never had (when in actuality my real life father is very loving, caring, and a honorable man). ^_^
 
LOL. No worries Queenbee. I'm not a murderer. I was just curious because sometimes I dream about being a little girl and being beaten by a father I never had (when in actuality my real life father is very loving, caring, and a honorable man). ^_^

Nightmares are always horrible.I have been getting them a lot lately as well.
 
What good is that insurance money when you're in jail? :stickout

Actually, unless they are specifically looking for anti-freeze it can't be detected by normal blood tests that are performed after a person dies. So aslong as the person is slowly poisoned with minimal amounts, and then dies in what would be considered a "natural" way. Then the chance of them finding it is almost non existant :stickout
 
Don't forget the old lace!

Bad use of a 1940's pun! Twenty minutes in the box!

(points to the box)...tut tut kopfhorer!

^_~ :stickout
 
Actually, unless they are specifically looking for anti-freeze it can't be detected by normal blood tests that are performed after a person dies. So aslong as the person is slowly poisoned with minimal amounts, and then dies in what would be considered a "natural" way. Then the chance of them finding it is almost non existant :stickout

That may be true. If there's even a hint of foul play, the body will have a battery of tests done on it. Unfortunately, antifreeze and arsenic poisoning can be detected; as arsenic poisoning was extremely common in the late 19th century. 😉
 
That may be true. If there's even a hint of foul play, the body will have a battery of tests done on it. Unfortunately, antifreeze and arsenic poisoning can be detected; as arsenic poisoning was extremely common in the late 19th century.

The presence of poison alone is not enough to warrant charges against an individual. One needs to prove of a inditing jury that there is enough SCIENTIFICALLY REASONABLE evidence (speculation alone is not enough as that often can work both ways) of how the poison got into the victim as well as a PLAUSIBLE motive.
 
What's New
9/10/25
When you support our advertisers you are also supporting us!

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1704 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top