Dear Steve,
Please accept my most sincere apologies for offending you. It was not my intent and I do believe, that in your excitement you may have overlooked one or two details in my post.
A Republican Chicken Hawk is a very specific reference to a very specific group of people who fulfill the following:
1. Republican (in name at least)
2. Avoided military service in a combat zone during time of war or Vietnam/Korea style "actions"
I do not recall specifically mentioning you in my post but I will check again and if so, will ask to have it removed.
I did in fact compare, a term used to describe the act of relating the qualities of one object to those of another, RCH's to Nazis. If I were a Nazi I would definitely be insulted, as you have so aptly pointed out. I did not compare ALL Republicans to ALL Nazis, as there are too many in my family (and one looking at me in the mirror each morning) who would have a problem with that. (It is important to note that neither RCH's or Nazis have indicated any degree of offense at my remarks.)
I too am a veteran, having served my country in one capacity or another for more than 26 years. I honor all who have served and respect their opinions but do have a slight problem with those who actively avoided (combat) service sending the youth of America off to war.
I am not jewish but am circumcised, if that helps. I confer the same amount of respect upon those who are jewish as well as "those other descendants of Abraham" who are currently not doing so well in their soon to be walled-in encampments and any other person who hasn't shown by words or actions that they are not worth being taken notice of.
For reasons unknown to me, some people seem to think that any comparison to Nazis lessens the significance of what the Nazis did. This has not been, is not, and will never be my intention. Rather I make the comparison because I see far too many similarities in much of what is currently being done and has been done in the name of "defending democracy". Ask the 3500 Taliban fighters taken prisoner of war by US led forces who never made it from one POW camp to the next. Or is it ok that all of these people were massacred? It truly pains me to see how often we forget what we are fighting for and where we have been.
Perhaps I should switch to comparing current US policy to that of Rome? Or would that be offensive also since they were pretty cruel to people in the middle east too? Problem is that Hollywood, our major source of factual historical information, hasn't really properly shown the brutality and abuses of the Roman Empire the way it has of the Nazis, so people have difficulty understanding the point.
If you believe that these similarities do not exist, I would welcome your arguments. As I have said in the past, I would love to be proven wrong.
And again, please accept my sincere apologies. My belief in God, country, and form of government is not however a Letter of Marque for the current government or any other government to go out and take what they can get with total disregard for international law or ethic because they have better bombs and chariots.
BTW, I will add "nimrod" to the list, which according to my Webster's New Universal Unabridged Dictionary, page 1213, refers to a biblical character, the son of Cush, a mighty hunter. Nobody's ever called me a mighty hunter before, although I am pretty damn good with a pistol. Personally I would have taken the next entry "nincompoop" which means a stupid silly person, but that was your call. Thanks for the honors.