Please throw some light on this issue people

[FAIS]

I just want to ask all you guys that if one of your ticklish spots are your "key areas" like boobs for females and penis for males then would you treat it like any other ticklish spot and let it be tickled as well during a tickling encounter. Would you treat the tickling as armpit or tummy etc? Why or why not?

Personally I think in a tickling encounter the whole of the body should be explored and that is without any element of sex or evil

 

[baby]

Well for me personally it would totally depend on WHO is tickling me. I can't see anyone tickling my breasts without it being sexual.
I've seen people who like playful tickling among friends here comparing it to kissing or hugging. I'm pretty sure, they'd stick to certain areas when kissing or hugging just a friend 😀

 

[the wiz]

I agree with baby, those spots usually leads to some type of sexual encounter, it depends on the lee if they feel comfortable enough to allow you to go that far or not.

 

[maniactickler]

I just want to ask all you guys that if one of your ticklish spots are your "key areas" like boobs for females and penis for males then would you treat it like any other ticklish spot and let it be tickled as well during a tickling encounter. Would you treat the tickling as armpit or tummy etc? Why or why not?

Personally I think in a tickling encounter the whole of the body should be explored and that is without any element of sex or evil

Only one way to find out. im offering my private area to any ladies here who would volunteer to tickle it.

 

[tickledgirl]

Personally I think in a tickling encounter the whole of the body should be explored...

I don't think anyone here would argue with that.

...and that is without any element of sex or evil

"Sex or evil"?? You're not quite coming out and saying it, but your implication seems to be that sex is evil. I'd strongly disagree with that! (long rant deleted here, since I'm just guessing at what you mean.)

If that's not what you're saying that sex is evil, can you explain what you are saying?

 

[FAIS]

Heyyy

I must admire your observation.That is great. However I didnt mean that sex is evil.

When I wrote about sex I meant that pure tickling of breasts and after the tickling there is not Sex and the Ler and Lee sit up and talk about the encounter.

When I wrote about Evil I meant that while breast tickling the Ler shudnt break Lee's trust and start to suck the lee's boobs and packs the tickling up and uses the bondage for breaking trust and sucking boobs which I think is really really EVIL

 

[IsraLer]

Taking advantage of a 'Lee's situation sexually without his/hers premission isn't evil as it is wrong. Doing something like that is certainly not right and I'd concider a person(s) who is doing this to be an outright jerk.

Personally, I find tickling to be very sexual, but if a session is meant for pure clean tickling, then...Err, it should stay that way!

Those were my two cents on this. Later

 

[TklDuo-Ann]

I generally follow the rule that anything that would be covered by shorts and a bikini top are off limits. That avoids unwanted complications in most cases. Since tickling with anyone but Drew is purely playful anyway, I don't cross the line into any sort of "overt sexual contact".

 

[tickledgirl]

When I wrote about Evil I meant that while breast tickling the Ler shudnt break Lee's trust and start to suck the lee's boobs and packs the tickling up and uses the bondage for breaking trust and sucking boobs which I think is really really EVIL

Ah, okay. (Glad I asked before going off on the rant I was all ready with.) I'd agree that.

Isra, (just because I have to have someone to argue with 🙂 ) I'd say that betraying a trust by sexually molesting someone against their will goes beyond "being a jerk." Betrayal of trust by sexual assault is pretty solidly evil for me.

 

[crydun]

I agree with Ann. Unless I truly trust the person. This means I know the person in real life and know they respect my limits. If I truly trust them(I'm thinking of one female friend of mine, right now) then those areas are explored. Otherwise, they are off-limits.

 

[FAIS]

Ah, okay. (Glad I asked before going off on the rant I was all ready with.) I'd agree that.

Gosh! I had a Lucky escape 😛 however Im glad that you agree with me.

I feel we r drifting away from our discussion.Let me put it this way.Suppose you are tied up for a tickling assault and the Ler finds your boobs/asshole to be ticklish(accidentally)and he decides to explore them. Would you accept it as a part of a normal tickling assault? Would you treat the tickling as you treat the armpit,side and feet tickling?

I sure would

 

[tickledgirl]

Let me put it this way.Suppose you are tied up for a tickling assault and the Ler finds your boobs/asshole to be ticklish(accidentally)and he decides to explore them. Would you accept it as a part of a normal tickling assault? Would you treat the tickling as you treat the armpit,side and feet tickling?

I sure would

Mmm...I don't think so, for some of the reasons discussed above. Tickling has a lot of erotic overtones for me. I think part of it is the sensation, and part of it is the loss of control. If I were okay with being tickled there, it'd make the experience different. But as Ann and crydun have noted, I can't imagine letting anyone but my husband tickle me there.

 

[FAIS]

Well Put

After your thoughts tickled girl I must say that even though I will accept the tickling on these parts but definately I would propose to that LER of mine or would accept her proposal if she puts forward to me after such an encounter

 

[kis123]

For the most part, I'm normally the ler; I have control issues, so sue me!

As the ler, I'd never tickle anyone in places that underwear covers; to me it's just asking for trouble.

When I switch, it's solely for fun and good times. I did run into a situation where it was getting hot, but I was in the company of professionals and nothing took place. They knew how far to take me and when to give me breaks.

When I met my SO, things went to a completely different level. He taught me a lot of things and we had a lot of fun. I have no intention of sharing that "fun" with just anyone, if you know what I mean.....

 

[shadow365]

Though it is a fetish which is by nature a sexual thing, I have to agree with Kis. It is a turn on sure, but I personally like to keep it seperate. I don't think tickling should necessarily have to lead to sex, in this manner you could meet people from the forum, engage in tickling activity, and have it not go any further than that. To me, that seems like a much safer practice and fewer emotions will get thrown out that may in turn hurt one person or the other involved in the tickling.

 

[nstklr]

I can see a situation here.

A male lee being gang tickled, by males and/or females, in non private areas. If tickling is anywhere near sexual to the lee, the resulting visible bulge in a private area could really make things swing one way or another beyond the lee's control.

What then? Sounds interesting though.

 

[Feathery]

For me, tickling is an entirely erotic, sensual and sexual experience. That means the lee's entire body is like a sumptuous feast to savour, relish and enjoy. If I'm given limits as to what I can or cannot have, then it's entirely futile, so why even bother?