Preferance question for you female 'lees

[tkrunner]

Do you prefer to be tickled by a man or a woman, or do u have no preference? Also, do you prefer to be tickled by just one person, or the more tickling u the merryer?

 

[xSamanthax]

Gender: No real preference. If I like the person, it doesn't matter what their gender is.

Number of 'lers: Preference will depend on my mood and what I want out of the encounter. I enjoy all types of tickle situations for different reasons.

1-1 tends to be a lot more intimate, focused, and more emotionally intense. Love to do this with people I am close to or have a good connection with. I hit subspace easily with this kind of tickling.

Group tickles tend to be a little more physically intense (multiple spots attacked at once) at the expense of emotional intensity (for me). More friendly and playful, rather than truly intimate. Subspace is hard to reach for me in a group situation. Not impossible, but not easy.

Two on one is sort of in between for me. But you get all the intensity without giving up any intimacy or focus.

So...all of the above, please!!! 😛

 

[tickleshotel]

No real preference for gender, I enjoy being tickled by guys,females or have a mix of females,guys tickling me all at same time as each gender has skills,talents unique(for example,females have long fingernails,guys have little or no nails but just as effective,devastasting to a lee (me,I am extremely ticklish whether happy,sad,pissed off)

Love one on one private sessions , 2 on 1 or gang tickles ,and alot of times I instigate tickles when I am in feisty,frisky mood

 

[Sammi-chan]

Ya know, I'm good either way when it comes to gender. That goes for most other similar questions, too. As long as they're good at what they do, then they can take a shot at me.

When it comes to numbers, I'm a sucker for group stuff. Having multiple lers, and even suffering with other lees, is awesome to me. The more people who can get their hands on me at once, the more I know I'm gonna be pushed to my very limits. However, there's a totally different dynamic when you've only got one ler. I expect very engaging talk from a single ler, as well as a near methodical exploitation of my nerves. They have to really seize the situation and make me theirs.

 

[BrightEyes1082]

I don't have a gender preference either. It depends highly on the person. I actually have a fear of being tickled (I love to hate it - more on that later, though) 😉 That being said, I have to really trust the person. If someone tickles me that I don't know very well, although my reactions may not completely show it, I get really scared and panicky (in a bad way, not the good way). Of course, I definitely prefer Lee to anybody else. 🙂

 

[Deleted member 66627]

I prefer male's for the most part.

The few time's I have *gasp* Ler'd it's been to females.

If I had like 8 or more people poking at me, Someone's hand would get bit off.

3 or less is fine.

 

[LD_Tickler]

one word...

If I had like 8 or more people poking at me, Someone's hand would get bit off.

...muzzles.

 

[Saeria]

It really depends on the nature of the tickling. If there are any sexual overtones at all in an intimate setting, I would likely prefer a male ler. I have, however, found the group setting to be rather fun as well. Although i've never really had the experience of a female ler, i think in a non-intimate, mostly fun setting, it would be all gravvy.

 

[Babbles]

Since you asked, thought I'd add...

Only m/f, or perhaps f/m to some extent.

I am not at all homophobic, but I absolutely hate f/f in this arena, in any medium.

There's just enough of a sexual connotation that it's repulsive to me, at least.
Of course, if it's a truly obnoxious male, that's also repulsive
Just another perspective. Take care.

 

[Sammi-chan]

Yeeeeah... That doesn't sound homophobic in the least. 😛

 

[Francie_Pants]

No gender preference, prefer one to one, and can deal with a few, but no more then three or four.

 

[Babbles]

Simply personal preference.

Yeeeeah... That doesn't sound homophobic in the least. 😛

Precisely. It's just not my sexual preference. Neither are arrogant men.
(Assertive, yes. Arrogant, hell no.)

So I can completely support gays and lesbians socially and politically
and would like them to have the freedom to hold hands in public
and discuss their significant others as we heterosexuals do so casually at lunch

but don't ask me to touch or be touched by a woman, in this manner.
Likewise the wrong guy, as I wrote.

However..... if this is how you interpret my reply,

I gather you must not mind either gender having their way with you 😛

 

[xSamanthax]

"if this is how you interpret my reply"

It is very difficult to interpret "repulsive" and "hate" in a supportive, positive light, sorry.

 

[Sleepy Jean]

Only with men. Only with one man. Only with my husband.

 

[Ferbtones]

nahh

not really. tickling is something i really enjoy, regardless if a male or female is doing the tickling.

 

[Headsnap]

"if this is how you interpret my reply"

It is very difficult to interpret "repulsive" and "hate" in a supportive, positive light, sorry.

Well yeah, but it's not hard to take the statement in the spirit it was intended. Babbles is irritating but I seriously doubt she is a homophobe. In fact she explicitly stated she wasn't, and it's difficult to see how anyone but the most insecure homosexual/ bisexual would interpret what she said as a slur against homos.

Also as a female lee I prefer being tickled with hoovers and a steak pie.

 

[xSamanthax]

Well yeah, but it's not hard to take the statement in the spirit it was intended. Babbles is irritating but I seriously doubt she is a homophobe. In fact she explicitly stated she wasn't, and it's difficult to see how anyone but the most insecure homosexual/ bisexual would interpret what she said as a slur against homos.

Also as a female lee I prefer being tickled with hoovers and a steak pie.

Then I would recommend addressing your comments to the person who called her homophobic.

I was addressing her comments claiming to be supportive. I was not addressing any fears of homosexuals she may or may not have.

 

[Headsnap]

Then I would recommend addressing your comments to the person who called her homophobic.

I was addressing her comments claiming to be supportive. I was not addressing any fears of homosexuals she may or may not have.

I wasn't "addressing" anyone, merely musing. You can drop your hands now, Tyson, you'll find no argumentationess here!

 

[xSamanthax]

I wasn't "addressing" anyone, merely musing. You can drop your hands now, Tyson, you'll find no argumentationess here!

Lol, sorry you had my post quoted so I thought you were replying to me, personally. No worries.

I'm no tyson...unless my kids are involved!

More like a or a

 

[Sammi-chan]

Precisely. It's just not my sexual preference. Neither are arrogant men.
(Assertive, yes. Arrogant, hell no.)

So I can completely support gays and lesbians socially and politically
and would like them to have the freedom to hold hands in public
and discuss their significant others as we heterosexuals do so casually at lunch

but don't ask me to touch or be touched by a woman, in this manner.
Likewise the wrong guy, as I wrote.

However..... if this is how you interpret my reply,

I gather you must not mind either gender having their way with you 😛

Well, there was just a bit of a negative vibe from saying you're personally repulsed by the idea of two women. For some reason when I read it, it sounded less like you were saying you don't like being touched by women, but that you found it repulsive for two women to be intimate. And well said about arrogant men. 😉

Oh, and for the record, I am cool with either gender.

 

[Babbles]

More's the pity.

Then I would recommend addressing your comments to the person who called her homophobic.

I was addressing her comments claiming to be supportive. I was not addressing any fears of homosexuals she may or may not have.

And I would recommend addressing your comments to the topic at hand, constructively rather than snidely.

Moreover, I'd recommend not slanting mine.

"if this is how you interpret my reply"

It is very difficult to interpret "repulsive" and "hate" in a supportive, positive light, sorry.

It's difficult to interpret your (purposely? yet again?) misconstrued commentary upon my statements, here a description of my sexual and/or "play" preference, in any other manner.

I was answering the question. I started to restate it -- but it's all up there. When folks don't bother to read clearly articulated thoughts, picking and choosing and maligning at will,
I do tend to get repetitive in the hopes that
clarity may dawn one decade...) 🙄 Along with better intentions.

There is a very obvious difference between
personal sexual/play preference

and intolerance of others' sexual or play preferences. If you actually have followed my comments --- obviously you haven't --- I've always been very glad for the tolerance of variety here, which can be expressed freely, unlike in society. I just don't enjoy f/f myself.

You will never see me comment - or imply - that f/f should not be here.
That didn't even *occur to me, nor as a possible misinterpretation, until I read yours. More of a balance, sure. Gone, no.

I didn't think I could have answered this question any more thoroughly and clearly,
but,
when some folks chronically look for the worst and actively seek to invent it where it isn't,

logic, like medicine, can't straighten everyone.

If you wanted clarification you could have just asked politely.

 

[Babbles]

Well, there was just a bit of a negative vibe from saying you're personally repulsed by the idea of two women. For some reason when I read it, it sounded less like you were saying you don't like being touched by women, but that you found it repulsive for two women to be intimate. And well said about arrogant men. 😉

Oh, and for the record, I am cool with either gender.

Thank you, for explaining your misunderstanding as well.

 

[Sammi-chan]

Thank you, for explaining your misunderstanding as well.

It's all cool. Works out a little better than two people repeating each other over and over and getting nowhere. 😛 Diff'rent strokes and all.

 

[Babbles]

Linguistic clarity at it's best.

Well yeah, but it's not hard to take the statement in the spirit it was intended. Babbles is irritating but I seriously doubt she is a homophobe. In fact she explicitly stated she wasn't, and it's difficult to see how anyone but the most insecure homosexual/ bisexual would interpret what she said as a slur against homos.

Also as a female lee I prefer being tickled with hoovers and a steak pie.

Much appreciated. For the most part, anyway 😛

 

[FlockOfSeagulls]

Much appreciated. For the most part, anyway 😛

this women speaks the truth