I'm not a hardcore fan, but I watch "The Next Generation" and the original series often enough to know who's who and what's going on and the like.
My question arose the other night while watching the "Generations" movie. The movie presents a gateway (or something) called the Nexus, where one is whisked into a paradise-like state. Picard finds Kirk there and yanks him out.
The rationale the movie presents for why they should leave the Nexus? "It isn't real."
This is the thing that bugs me the most about Star Trek - its insistence on one cold, hard, scientific reality as The Real Thing, and every notion of an alternative plane of existence as illusion. (Or, to paraphrase David Brenner, if you can't eat it or cut it with a knife, it isn't real.)
The ending of "Generations" felt flat to me for this reason. Naturally, if you're in some paradise being fanned and fed grapes by Cindy Crawford and her identical twin sister, and it's pointed out to you that this is just a hallucination, you can't make a strong case for staying.
But how much more intriguing it would have been, say, to suggest that the Nexus was a real, viable alternate plane of existence; but that both Kirk and Picard, despite being tempted, felt they had to leave (out of duty or loyalty or the like); yet they both yearned for what they had given up.
Just wondering how the hardcore Star Trek folks here feel about this. Anyone else feel that the series take on Reality (there is but one comprehensible Reality; anything else is "not real") is confining?
My question arose the other night while watching the "Generations" movie. The movie presents a gateway (or something) called the Nexus, where one is whisked into a paradise-like state. Picard finds Kirk there and yanks him out.
The rationale the movie presents for why they should leave the Nexus? "It isn't real."
This is the thing that bugs me the most about Star Trek - its insistence on one cold, hard, scientific reality as The Real Thing, and every notion of an alternative plane of existence as illusion. (Or, to paraphrase David Brenner, if you can't eat it or cut it with a knife, it isn't real.)
The ending of "Generations" felt flat to me for this reason. Naturally, if you're in some paradise being fanned and fed grapes by Cindy Crawford and her identical twin sister, and it's pointed out to you that this is just a hallucination, you can't make a strong case for staying.
But how much more intriguing it would have been, say, to suggest that the Nexus was a real, viable alternate plane of existence; but that both Kirk and Picard, despite being tempted, felt they had to leave (out of duty or loyalty or the like); yet they both yearned for what they had given up.
Just wondering how the hardcore Star Trek folks here feel about this. Anyone else feel that the series take on Reality (there is but one comprehensible Reality; anything else is "not real") is confining?