ratio pleasure to pain involved in tickling

[Kantian Ethics]

Hi y'all !
I'm curious about the quantity of pain/annoyance involved in the process of being tickled. I'd say for example that, as far as I'm concerned, the pleasure-to-pain ratio would be something like 70% pleasure 30% pain. Get me ?

Clearly for those with whom pain outweighs pleasure, tickling as a lee isn't profitable (or in a sheer masochistic sense, which most of us are proably stranger to). On the opposite end, for some people (I don't know!), the pleasure taken might overwhelmingly exceeds the pain/displeasure.

Enough tittle-tattle, let's see your results ! What's your ratio ?

 

[aun_existe_amor]

I don't get any pleasure at all out of being tickled. I'm 100% ler

 

[milagros317]

It varies greatly with the tickler.

With a tickler who knows what I like, she can make it about 99% pleasure, 1% discomfort.

If instead she's a novice who's blind to feedback, it might be 50%/50%.

 

[Kantian Ethics]

Thanks to you both. Any insight from bonafide lees ?

 

[WheresThe Clip?]

A great quote I read somewhere stated that: 'Tickling is not painful, but is always becoming so'.

 

[playgirl]

this is a difficult question to answer because it all depends on the ler. with the perfect or even a good ler, it can be 100% pleasurable. however, with a ler who doesn't know what they're doing, it can be painful if they're causing bruises or digging in too hard without it being ticklish. it can also be painfully annoying when you want to be tickled and the ler doesn't know what to do, have the confidence to do it or the chemistry just isn't there.