OH TIB,
This is just reverse psychology of your reversed psychology, put into rewind and played backwards at twice normal speed. Are we to really believe that a screamer is ticklish laugher who thinks she is ticklish when not really being tickled? Or not laughing? If you tell us she is a screamer, does that forgive her not being ticklish? If she is ticklish, does the screaming forgive her not laughing? I know you told us that, but does it really mater?
We are being led astray by one who wants to confuse us (or is it do something nice for us?) You are trying to lead thirsty camels to water, but can you really make us drink if we are not thirsty? If you tickle the camel on it's foot, will it laugh, scream or just drink the water (maybe it will just kick). Does anyone really care what a camel does? And, if reversed psychology is reversed, doesn't it become regular psychology? Unless of course, it is reversed a third time (kind of like making 3 rights to avoid a left… or is it three lefts to avoid a right?) Oh well.
Can you believe I have had no alcoholic beverages (or any other substance) as I am typing this? Does anyone have any idea what I'm saying? If so, please let me know.
Sorry TIB, I just needed to type this before the responses get really strange.
)....
