• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • Reminder - We have a ZERO TOLERANCE policy regarding content involving minors, regardless of intent. Any content containing minors will result in an immediate ban. If you see any such content, please report it using the "report" button on the bottom left of the post.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

The Battle Of Britain..

Neutron

Guest
Joined
Apr 19, 2001
Messages
3,862
Points
0
Ok Eneough is ENOUGH. Last night my ankle was killing me, so I couldn't fall asleep. I was so bored I turned on the Half Truth and Blatant Lies Channel. (You all call it the history channel). The Show was called Heavy Metal, which I watch at times for the vintage footage. Anyways the subject was the Supermarine Spitfire. Now I love the Spitfire, don't get me wrong. They were beautiful, high performance airplanes, and for something so light and graceful looking they packed a fearsome punch. They could also take a beating too. (I do believe that up until late 1942 the Zero was their superior, but only in tropical climes).
Ok the claims made about the Spitfire during that program didn't bother me. I acknowledge her superior war record, and let's face it, every Brit Pilot who flew one said they never wanted to fly anything else.
At the end they used the Churchill quote that nauseates me to nO end. In reference to the Battle Of Britain he said Never have so few owed so much to so many.

BULLSHIT!!!!

1: I realize it's traumatic to have your country bombed.
2: I think Churchill taking a stroll during a bombing raid was a magnificent gesture and a direct slap in the face of Nazi Germany. I also realize Churchill recognized the value of symbology. As much as I hate it, I voted for Churchill to be Time Magazines Man Of The 20th Century for holding Britain together as the sole opponent to Germany after Frances Fall. (A little known fact of WW2. Britain was also organizing Scandinavian resistance against the russians at this time, so she had plenty on her hands)

Now. Saying that.

1: The Battle Of Britain was a relatively minor affair compared with many other battles in the war. Total losses on BOTH sides were less than what the Japanese lost at The Battle Of The Philippine Sea.

2: Germany lost more economic value in ONE bombing raid, on an almost night by night basis.

3: The Germans were never going to invade Britain. Even before the nazis started bombing Britain, Hitler had already decided to invade Russia. He considered Russia the real enemy and never fully understood why BRitain was even fighting the war. He also never understood why Churchill couldn't see the Russians as the "true" enemy. Hitler went on record many times as admiring the Brits and their empire. His BIGGEST concern was if the British Empire fell, it would strengthen the US and Japan. He didn't want that.

4: After Norway, NO WAY was Hitler going to invade Britain.
Germany did not have a large Navy. When Hitler told Raeder he was to prepare the Navy to invade Norway Raeder was against it. Raeder told Hitler they'd loose half their Navy if they went through with it. They lost almot exactly half, with the rest so damaged the germans couldn't mount a Naval offensive for 6 months. Hitler knew invading Britain would cost him the rest of the Navy and most of the luftwaffe.
Here were Hitlers three conditions for invading England

A: The Luftwaffe neutralizes the English Air Force. He knew this couldn't be met because Germany had no 4 engine bomber so couldn't drop enough bombs in any one mission to really make a difference. Any other way was attrition warfare, and with the Russian campaign coming up Hitler couldn't afford it.

B: The Navy seals off both ends of the English Channel with minefields so thick that no RN Fleet could make it to the invasion site.

C: Raeder guarantees complete control of the seas. Impossible. Their Navy wasn't large enough, and the Royal Navy had already thoroughly trounced it off Norway.

While Hitler allowed planning to go on. He never intended to carry it out. In fact, they didn't have large enough landing ships to land tanks. They intended on landing HORSES!!!!. Hitler did this a lot. Many times prior to 1942 he'd tell his Generals to plan operations against the Brits, because the Generals considered Britain the true enemy. Hitler felt the Brits were placing their hopes on the Russians. In other words since Britain wasn't going to get back to the Continent for awhile, hItler felt if Germany crushed Russia that England would say, Ah Fuck it.

5: Last Myth. That somehow the Battle Of Britain bled the Luftwaffe dry. Goering never considered Britain as the major theater of the war. His method of neuitralizing the British Air Force was by launching bombing raids, in hopes the German fighters could shoot down enough Brit fighters to turn the tide against Britain. He never committed more than 2 Luftwaffe Divisions. This strategy was a fallacy in that it's VERY hard to win in Dogfighting warfare over enemy territory, simply because a lot of planes that might not have made it home were simply landed for repairs. A country with Englands industrial might was certainly capable of doing this, and they did do it. In contrast, at one time there were over 50 Luftwaffe Divisions over Russia. Russia bled the Luftwaffe not Britain.

There my rant ends!

Tron
 
Oh lordy!......

....I have to go out now for some "wife beater" so i dont have time to respond just now Tronny, but in the meantime could i refer you to red indian posts on the subject some time ago.

I,m sure he does this just to wind me up!
 
Tron, I shall say this now: You outstrip my own historical knowledge, so please excuse me if i foul up on the details here, but...

Minor as the BOB was, please remember that after the fall of France, Britain was the last major stronghold of European defiance against Nazi Germany, barring Russia. To cripple Britain and render it unable to fight further in the war would have been a major coup for the Axis forces: Our forces were small but our influence and expertise were great.

Now, following on from that point, consider what you wrote at a particular point in that post above: That Germany's Navy was somewhat small. Quite true. Hence, an invasion of Britain would require power over the air, so as to enable the Luftwaffe the ability to knock out Britains own navy: The Japanese had already proved that air superiority was a powerful weapon against the traditional Warship.
Therefore, control of the air would have to be wrestled from the RAF. Had they succeeded in doing so, Hitlers ram-shackle Operation Sea Lion might well have been pulled off, and things would be somewhat different. Indeed, had Hitler decided to carry on hitting our airfeilds instaed of raising London to the ground, the RAF would have been hammered outright. As things happened, they received a respite, and gathered there muster to render the Luftwaffe impotent over Britain.
In that context at least we could call the Battle of Britain an important factor (of sorts) in the grand scheme of things, but I accept the fact that for the most part it was a symbolic act of defiance rather than a major contribution to the allied war effort.

AT
 
An interesting "What-If"

Read INVASION: The German Invasion of England, July 1940 by Kenneth Macksey (MacMillan, 1980.) It outlines a plausible means that the invasion of England could have worked. If it had, the outcome of WW-II would have been very different, in some very unpleasant ways.

Strelnikov
 
No...

Japan did not prove anything of the sort. The Germans proved Air Superiority would deny SEA Control. BUT they also proved it was not enough to succeed in an invasion. The Japanese victories were minor in nature

1: Peral Harbor: A strike PRIOR to decalaring war that had no strategic importance. Every US Ship sunk at Pearl, except the Arizona and Oklahoma was back in the war by 1942.

2: Indian Ocean/Singapore: The IJN sunk an unprepared Brit Task force that should have never been there to begin with. EVERYTIME the IJN faced an enemy that was prepared they lost. Whether they had air control or not. Air control cannot either enable or disable an invasion.

I never said the BOB was minor. I merely stated that it wasn't the saver of humanity that Churchill claimed it wasn't. Read Hitlars Naval War and The Luftwaffe Diaries, and countless other books written by Germans. Hitler never seriously contemplated invading England, and had he tried the English Navy would have thoroughly pummeled him. Germany had air superiority over norway, and STILL lost over half her Navy and would have lost the whole battle had not France collapsed.

Tron
 
What's New
2/28/26
Check out the TMF Links forum for updates on tickling sites all around the web.

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Top