Let me start off by saying that I love Tickle Central (Tickled2Death.com, ticklecentral.com) clips. The girls are pretty, they seem to favor nylon tickle to a point (a favorite of mine), and their clips are USUALLY great (ticklish girls, nice reaction, good scenarios, great ticklers).
However, I recently found an exception with the above clip, as well as some others I've recently viewed.
To get to the point, I have found that Sara is a great tickler, but Chloe is far from being ticklish. On a scale from 1 to 10, she seems to be around a 3...on a good day. Her reactions seem to be extremely derived, ingenuine, and, bluntly, kinda lame.
The biggest indicator of this is that she often times will just stop laughing in the midst of being tickled, or not react immediately to being tickled (if there's a break in the tickling, it will take her a few seconds to start laughing once it commences). At some points, she will just smile...no laughing at all. She also thrashes and jerks quite irregularly. Case in point, her stomach is being tickled, and she will jerk about. Sara will move to her underarms, but when she returns to the stomach, it won't be as ticklish as it just was. The same with her feet.
The other HUGE indicator is that every so often, she will actually look at the camera, as if to say, "Are we still rolling, or can I stop acting for a minute?"
In short, her reactions when parts of her body are tickled range far too much (from just a smile to a {fake sounding, IMO} belly laugh) with similar tickling techniques for it to be genuine.
Some may argue that she is probably just running out of breath, but she has a number of planned breaks amidst the tickling (tickler position changes) that she should not be stopping/starting as much as she does. And, even still, if someone runs out of breath while being tickled, I expect to hear gasping of some sort, and maybe even begging to stop for a second. Not just dead air for 5 seconds.
The content of the video is enjoyable though, if you can get past the fact that she's not ticklish. Probably 70% nylon foot tickling, 25% upperbody, and 5% barefeet (just about perfect, IMO). She has cute feet too, so that's fine as well. The best part of the video is Sara and her technique. She seems like she is enjoying herself, and playfully teases in an accent. Plus, she really gets into the tickling. Nothing irks me more than the see a video where the feet are not held/stabalized, and someone's fingers are BARELY touching them. Sara holds the feet, digs her nails in, and attempts to evoke a reaction, even is Chloe doesn't really give one. Very cute.
As I said, most of their videos are excellent. But, it does seems as of late that they are loosening their model guidlines, giving a little on the ticklishness scale to land some hot looking girls. My advice is that if you are going to spend $8 on their clips, look back to at least clips from 2006 or before.
However, I recently found an exception with the above clip, as well as some others I've recently viewed.
To get to the point, I have found that Sara is a great tickler, but Chloe is far from being ticklish. On a scale from 1 to 10, she seems to be around a 3...on a good day. Her reactions seem to be extremely derived, ingenuine, and, bluntly, kinda lame.
The biggest indicator of this is that she often times will just stop laughing in the midst of being tickled, or not react immediately to being tickled (if there's a break in the tickling, it will take her a few seconds to start laughing once it commences). At some points, she will just smile...no laughing at all. She also thrashes and jerks quite irregularly. Case in point, her stomach is being tickled, and she will jerk about. Sara will move to her underarms, but when she returns to the stomach, it won't be as ticklish as it just was. The same with her feet.
The other HUGE indicator is that every so often, she will actually look at the camera, as if to say, "Are we still rolling, or can I stop acting for a minute?"
In short, her reactions when parts of her body are tickled range far too much (from just a smile to a {fake sounding, IMO} belly laugh) with similar tickling techniques for it to be genuine.
Some may argue that she is probably just running out of breath, but she has a number of planned breaks amidst the tickling (tickler position changes) that she should not be stopping/starting as much as she does. And, even still, if someone runs out of breath while being tickled, I expect to hear gasping of some sort, and maybe even begging to stop for a second. Not just dead air for 5 seconds.
The content of the video is enjoyable though, if you can get past the fact that she's not ticklish. Probably 70% nylon foot tickling, 25% upperbody, and 5% barefeet (just about perfect, IMO). She has cute feet too, so that's fine as well. The best part of the video is Sara and her technique. She seems like she is enjoying herself, and playfully teases in an accent. Plus, she really gets into the tickling. Nothing irks me more than the see a video where the feet are not held/stabalized, and someone's fingers are BARELY touching them. Sara holds the feet, digs her nails in, and attempts to evoke a reaction, even is Chloe doesn't really give one. Very cute.
As I said, most of their videos are excellent. But, it does seems as of late that they are loosening their model guidlines, giving a little on the ticklishness scale to land some hot looking girls. My advice is that if you are going to spend $8 on their clips, look back to at least clips from 2006 or before.
