biddlybong
Registered User
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2023
- Messages
- 12
- Points
- 1
I agree with you!
If someone is forced to sign a document or forced to participate in something, then of course it is a crime. Of course.
But this is not the case. Biddlybong wrote that: "they tell the girls they will use unspecified techniques such as bugs, TICKLING and sounds, etc to cause reactions of desperation for the purposes of scientific research".
I have read it 3 times, he really wrote "they tell the girls"!!! This means the girl knew she would be "tortured" (maybe not sure if with tickling, or bugs or sounds).
He (not me) said that the girl was informed that they would try to scare her with BUGS (!) and many other things, including TICKLING...
And the girl decided to participate... Then Biddlybong told us she signed the model release form, without any coercion, that authorizes the distribution of the video (and it's obvious, if not, the different distributors will never accept the video). Did she sign before or after?? It doesn't matter, because in any case she signed without any coercion.
Then he told us that AFTER that (after the model release form was signed!) these 2 girls (the participant and the producer) signed another contract... What this 2nd contract contains, we don't know and why the participant signed it? It's a mystery! He said that is "to keep her quiet", then why, after some days, the participant signs a new document "to stay quiet"?
But in any case, it is not really important in my uneducated opinion, because the fact is that these 2 girls meet AGAIN to sign another document, again without any coercion...
What Biddlybong also repeated is that this company does not tell the participants that these videos will be distributed into the fetish market. It seems that this company only told them that these videos would be sold worldwide (model release form), without specifying the "fetish market". Also, they don't tell exactly which techniques will be used to cause desperation, they "only" tell them they will be tortured
(maybe with bugs!
And in my inexperienced opinion, this may be immoral, but not a crime.
I have seen the video of "May didn't know she will be tickled" and it is evident that May had no idea that she would be tickled... but also in the first minutes of the video they told her in front of the camera that she would be "distressed and tormented with unspecified painful but not dangerous techniques", and the girl accepted.
In any case, considering that Biddlybong said he knew the participant, he can just ask her for those 2 documents she has signed and post them here (perhaps covering the names of the 2 girls)... it's simple!
PD and yes Iggy pop, these girls don't seem malnourished, perhaps "a little reckless", but not extremely poor...
The way you write bares a striking resemblance to the descriptions on TickleDr and the fact that you are defending their activities so much makes me wonder if it's you?
Tricking girls into believing they are participating in a clinical trial for medical science when in fact you are producing fetish videos is wrong. No amount of "it's a real clinical trial" and "it's not fetish" changes the fact that you're manipulating these women into being sexually abused.