• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Tickling,acceptable or violation ?

e4b2

TMF Novice
Joined
Oct 3, 2001
Messages
56
Points
0
My opinion is that if the tickling is providing pleasure to the other individual and they are CONSENTING to it ,then it is alright.

If the tickler is doing the tickling NOT to provide pleasure to the other individual but forcing the ticking on them for their own sadistic satisfaction then it becomes a VIOLATION and would be considered ASSAULT. The tickling would be no differerent than if you beat someone with your fists and feet. Assault is assault. Anything done to another individual without their consent is ASSAULT !

What say the rest of you ? Agree or disagree ?
 
e4b2 said:
My opinion is that if the tickling is providing pleasure to the other individual and they are CONSENTING to it ,then it is alright.

If the tickler is doing the tickling NOT to provide pleasure to the other individual but forcing the ticking on them for their own sadistic satisfaction then it becomes a VIOLATION and would be considered ASSAULT. The tickling would be no differerent than if you beat someone with your fists and feet. Assault is assault. Anything done to another individual without their consent is ASSAULT !

What say the rest of you ? Agree or disagree ?

Well the law would consider non consensual touching an assault, as of course tickling would be.
 
ok

While tickling someone to extremes w/o their consent is wrong,unless the tickling results in injury,its not assault.......................just had to throw it out there cuz this comes up often.
 
To an extent, tickling without consent shouldn't be assault. I mean, part of tickling is that you tackle someone sudenly, without permission, and do it even if they don't like it. That's just the nature of the game. It's not harmful in and of itself though.

However, if true sadism were involved, it would be unlawful. :bat: (<--Batman will get violators.)
 
Well DUH! Of course that would be assault which should only be reserved for your enemies! :whip:
 
Well, tickling someone that doesn't want to be tickled is wrong imo. Whether it's an assault is another question. Juridically there has to be an injury.
 
This line of reasoning never seems to amaze me. So I would say to all you Tickler guys out there, if your MALE boss at work kept tickling you, would you consider that playful fun or an assault ?
 
ok

I'm not condoning it..............just clarifying what it is. It would fall under the category of harrassment..........unless there's an injury!!
 
goreevil said:
It isn't assualt, so long as it's playful :jester: .

I was talking about actually wrestling someone down and tickling them against they're will. That would be assault.
 
I don't even tickle people I do know, I would never even consider it to people I don't.
 
Do you ask your wife for her permission before you penetrate her? Soon you'll be wanting laws against flirting without consent or looking at strangers in a saucy way without consent. I don't know what is wrong with you if you think that tickling is VIOLATION or HARRASSMENT.
 
Tickling no matter how you do it is a GAME!! Nothing more! It maybe a turn on for some, but a complete turn off for others! I question the sincerity of the 'ler' who does it without consent!! A game that only you enjoy is not a fun game for everyone else( I believe that could come back to haunt you)! It's like the kid on the playground who won't share the ball, eventually that kid will find himself(herself) in a vacuum! No 'lee' will want to play after awhile! I would think that obvious!!!
 
Vamp said:
Do you ask your wife for her permission before you penetrate her? Soon you'll be wanting laws against flirting without consent or looking at strangers in a saucy way without consent. I don't know what is wrong with you if you think that tickling is VIOLATION or HARRASSMENT.

Uhhhh.... Who are you? I don't have a wife, never even had a girlfriend, but I have a deep respect for personel space and anyone who violates it deserves the consequences.
 
Metrion said:
To an extent, tickling without consent shouldn't be assault. I mean, part of tickling is that you tackle someone sudenly, without permission, and do it even if they don't like it. That's just the nature of the game. It's not harmful in and of itself though.

However, if true sadism were involved, it would be unlawful. :bat: (<--Batman will get violators.)

I guess you're right. It can't really be harmful if harm isn't intended. However if the person expressed to me that they dislike it then I would never do it again.
 
Gothmog said:
Uhhhh.... Who are you? I don't have a wife, never even had a girlfriend, but I have a deep respect for personel space and anyone who violates it deserves the consequences.

Hi gothmog. I wasn't really talking to you in particular. I was only trying to highlight that this sould be a case of VERY simple judgement to anyone with half a brain and that harrassment laws against things like tickling take away our freedom to simply fool around and play with one-another and have fun.

Toneus said: "How would you like it if your MALE boss started tickling you every day?" Well I wouldn't really like it, but there is a difference between this and tickling. It's kind of like saying "Flirting. Acceptable or non acceptable??" - If someone whose advances you find repulsive hits on you a couple of times, you'd send out clear signals you weren't interested. If they have any sense of judgement they'll probably not bother again. But if they followed you around all day making innuendos and grabbing you despite your icy reception and despite you clearly and seriously telling them to back off, THEN it would be a case of harrassment. Just use your head ffs!

Gothmog, if you never tickle anyone out of respect for their personal space, it's nice that you're thinking of them, but unless they are haemophiliacs or something, I think you're worrying WAY too much. Tickling shouldn't be abuse and if you're the one doing it, it won't be unless that's your intention. I think you're afraid to be human if you won't touch people out of "respect"

Like Metrion said, tickling is supposed to be unpleasant and fun kinda at the same time. It's not the sort of thing you should have to ask permission to do. Just listen to your heart ;-)
 
You missed the point

ViperGTS said:
If you're gonna freak out because you got tickled, you need to grow up.

If someone doesn't enjoy or want to be tickled then you don't have the right to force it on them just because you may be physically stronger than the other individual. The law is quite clear on this. If you don't believe me then the next time you see an attractive policewoman go up to her and start tickling her and see what happens.
 
Vamp said:
Toneus said: "How would you like it if your MALE boss started tickling you every day?" Well I wouldn't really like it, but there is a difference between this and tickling. It's kind of like saying "Flirting. Acceptable or non acceptable??"

So what is the difference ? The fact that you as a guy may not like being tickled by a man (who may be wanting to flirt with you for all you know), but assume that all women are going to be receptive to you touching them.

Similarly you say "why you'll need permission to penetrate your wife next". Well I assume you would give her some sort of advance warning in case she might possibly not be in the mood.

However I am willing to be proved wrong, so tell all about your real life adventures ticking women who didn't invite you to. Perhaps you have some method we can all try that won't have us either ending up in court, or at the least with a black eye.
 
toneus79 said:
So what is the difference ? The fact that you as a guy may not like being tickled by a man (who may be wanting to flirt with you for all you know), but assume that all women are going to be receptive to you touching them.

Similarly you say "why you'll need permission to penetrate your wife next". Well I assume you would give her some sort of advance warning in case she might possibly not be in the mood.

However I am willing to be proved wrong, so tell all about your real life adventures ticking women who didn't invite you to. Perhaps you have some method we can all try that won't have us either ending up in court, or at the least with a black eye.

The last time I tickled a girl I didn't know was at a house party. I walked into the kitchen and a girl had her feet on the table. I pretended i was her mother, made a shocked face and said "feet off the table missy" and tickled her and she yelped and pulled away. I'd never even seen this girl before and it wasn't my house but it didn't look weird because I did it with plenty confidence. She was quite taken with me actually. That was a couple of weeks ago and I haven't had a court summons yet. I tickle girls all the time. If I see a girl I know I sometimes pick her up when she goes to hug me and tickle her or I might come up behind her and grab her sides or put my hands around her neck instead of tapping her on the shoulder. Oh and this is a fun one I do when in a bar or club: Tell the girl to put her hands flat on the table, palms down. Then I put our drinks on the backs of her hands hehe and I tease her (she can't mover her hands or she spills the drinks) and gently poke her sides. I love this one so much!!

So anyway yeah, tickling is acceptable. Being a PEST isn't.
 
Metrion and Vamp have a point. The initial act isn't a bad thing but, if the person obviously detests it, you should stop. Anything further is true assault.
 
Actually I retract my statement of they deserve whatever the consequences. I don't hurt people. But while tickling may be fun to one person it can be very humiliating, or traumatic to another, I'm just asking people to be able to look through some one elses' eyes.
 
Vamp said:
The last time I tickled a girl I didn't know was at a house party. I walked into the kitchen and a girl had her feet on the table. I pretended i was her mother, made a shocked face and said "feet off the table missy" and tickled her and she yelped and pulled away. I'd never even seen this girl before and it wasn't my house but it didn't look weird because I did it with plenty confidence. She was quite taken with me actually. That was a couple of weeks ago and I haven't had a court summons yet. I tickle girls all the time. If I see a girl I know I sometimes pick her up when she goes to hug me and tickle her or I might come up behind her and grab her sides or put my hands around her neck instead of tapping her on the shoulder. Oh and this is a fun one I do when in a bar or club: Tell the girl to put her hands flat on the table, palms down. Then I put our drinks on the backs of her hands hehe and I tease her (she can't mover her hands or she spills the drinks) and gently poke her sides. I love this one so much!!

So anyway yeah, tickling is acceptable. Being a PEST isn't.

Couldn't have said it better myself.
 
To rake or not to R A K E ?

scottg said:
While tickling someone to extremes w/o their consent is wrong,unless the tickling results in injury,its not assault.......................just had to throw it out there cuz this comes up often.



and what if it starts with their consent and you know they don't "really" want you to stop but they keep screaming for you to stop? what is that Scottie G ?

~elaah ::giggling::
 
What's New
9/25/25
Visit the TMF Welcome forum and take a moment to say hi to us!

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1704 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Top