tickling - clothes vs bare skin

[mike273273]

I think most will say bare skin tickles more than clothes. But in a way wouldn't being tickled with a shirt on tickle in that the movement of the shirt tickles you?

What about someone placing their hands under the shirt? Would that tickle more in that you can't see the hands?

 

[Azrael]

Clothes vs. Bare Skin

As a Switch, predominantly 'Ler but with plenty of 'Lee experience,

I've never understood the whole "super-sensitive" thing. "The movement of my clothes tickles me," and "walking barefoot through the grass tickles me" strikes me as being something that would be said purely as a come-on. If the movement of one's clothes tickled one, one would have a great deal of trouble staying composed in public; thus I must assume that any such sensation, if it exists at all, is so exceptionally mild as to be completely ignorable.

I'll bring up further ponderings on that subject in a separate thread.

As someone who prefers sensuality in tickling, I much prefer the tickling of bare skin in any event, but that's just me. I should probably add that I find bare skin to be more sensual than clothing, personally; I enjoy the softness, the warmth, the slight tingle of excitement I get with intimate skin-on-skin contact (I savor being wanted, and cared about, and what's a better indication of that than a 'Lee letting me get that close to her in such a situation?) I understand that some people do strongly prefer otherwise.

What I do REALLY enjoy, both in the doing of it and having it done to me, is sliding my hands up underneath clothing. I do believe that being unaware of the exact location of the impending tickling (ala, blindfolding; same principle) does increase the resulting sensation, and there's something about the sheer, mischievous quality of it that appeals to me.

 

[NavelTickler75]

I would most definately want to have my lee with clothes, now of course bare feet, pits, and tummy, but nothing sexual showing.

 

[ChosenofMystra]

Not a big fan of clothed tickling personally. Just something sensual about bare skin and fingers running up and down it.

 

[Mistress Aura]

I would most definately want to have my lee with clothes, now of course bare feet, pits, and tummy, but nothing sexual showing.

Navel, would that still be your preference even if the 'lee were your wife? (You know I'm not ragging you, I'm seriously just curious... 🙂 )

I think that if I were a 'ler, I'd rather experiment. I know from personal experience that certain materials drastically intensify sensation and would make soft finger- or fingernail-tickling positively devastating, almost irrespective of where on the body it's performed. Bare skin is more intimate, of course, but it would depend on what the planned outcome of the tryst is (no pun intended 🙄 ) and the actual intent of the tickling per se--is one more interested in the intimacy or sensation?

I reiterate--if I were a 'ler, I think I'd enjoy just experimenting. 😀

Mistress Aura

 

[Iwant2Btickled]

i wouldn't know personally...but it would seem to me that the uncovering of one's skin would be more enjoyable than just starting off completely undressed.... I know i've read and heard that people liken it to opening a present...unwrapping it is half the fun.. it just seems to me that being tickled over clothing would intensify the anticipation of when the ler would slide their hands underneath or unbutton something and slide their fingers inside ...knowing how much worse it will tickle would certainly heighten the sensation for me i think..and of course, add the verbal teasing on top of it... wow. i can only imagine how insane i'd be.

 

[isabeau]

bare-butt naked baby...oops sorry bad bad Izzy...settle down now lol

seriously, i've always fantasized about being slowly undressed while tied, until i'm completely undressed...then tickled...