Tickling should be porn free

[The_Musician]

I've seen alot of tickling on the net,alot of differant sites and in the old days some magazines.I think all porn should be left out,tickling should be just that TICKLING and nothing more.Nudity shouldn't be apart of tickling a bra and panty is fine or bathing suit is ok,but the video producers should leave the porn out.If I wanted to see a girl get off having a orgasem there is more than enough internet sites to go to.There are plenty of porn sites,lets not mix them into the few tickling sites we have.MTP,Dungeon maidens,FM Concepts are just a few sites that might do better without the porn.This is me,but I don't care about a nude girl getting her ass tickled or her vagina feathered I can get this about anywhere.
There isn't enough tickle sites as it is.Anyway this is my own personnel opinion for what is is worth.Tickling should be just that tickling and all the tickle spots or should I say the good ones you can get to with her clothes on.Lets leave the vibrators to the porn producers.
The Musician

 

[TklDuo-Ann]

My own personal tastes would pretty much put me in agreement with you. However, there are a lot of different tastes in the community...many with a more sexual bent to them. Thus, the more sexual atmosphere in the site material you'll find out there. The bottom line is that those who run sites will provide what's in demand. So, we'll see more than we sometimes care to while others will likely see less. 'Tis the nature of the business.

Ann

 

[TickleCrazy]

I love bondage with tickling. I love nudity with tickling. I love vibrating with tickling. Orgasming during tickling is awesome. Tickling and sex are inseparable. Videos like this are fabulous. Vanilla videos suck. Just one opinion.

 

[tklr5150]

I generally prefer tickling videos without the more pornographic elements.....and yet, when I watch straight porn I keep hoping they'll break out the tickling....weird 😀

 

[The_Musician]

well put Ann

I see and understand what your saying,like I said it's just my humble opinion.To all that read the post I do like tickling and sex and tying up a girl and tickling her is wonderful,I just want to be in the scene and not watch it lol lol!!!!!!!

The Musician

 

[AffectionateDan]

I've said it before, I'll doubtless say it again...

Tickling can run the spectrum between innocent horseplay to erotic foreplay. Everyone has their own tastes. Nobody's is better than anybody else's (except mine, of course 🙄 ), and I'm sure we can all agree to disagree, so shush and play nice, or I'll give ya a time out. 😛

 

[Lazarus]

In agreement

I happen to agree with the original poster.

I love to tickle Meems....especially naked....🙂🙂🙂

BUT, when watching a tickling vid, I much prefer that there be minimal, if none at all, nudity at all.

Just my opinion; please direct all flames/hate mail to that NFL/ Nuclear guy...😛

Lazster

 

[Limeoutsider]

I hope I dont step on toes with this but, its a business thing, and, as Ann asid, there are different tastes, and it would be bad business to seclude any of the consumers.

 

[TickleCrazy]

God, no doubt. I'm so aroused, wet, hot after being tied up nude and tickled forever ...

I can't even sit still after reading that, Steph! I don't have piercings but the hot wet tied up tickled nude clit vibrator tongue part I totally relate to. Gonna go wake my honey now... We'll make our own tickleporn video some day.

 

[Amnesiac]

Why can't we have both?

Tickling provokes an automatic sexual response in me. BUT, I can, with some concentration, separate the two and make it fun (like when I tickle my nieces...nothing sexual there).

Your issue has merit, yes, but I think you overstate your problem. Yes, there's a lot of pseudo-pornographic tickling material, but its not everywhere you look.

Not all of MTP's stuff is nudity/porno quality

Not all of TIB's stuff is nudity/porno quality

Yaqi's stuff NEVER had nudity/porno material

frenchtickling doesn't even HAVE semi-nudity

There are all sorts of variations on what people want:

Nudity/non-sexual
Non-nudity/sexual
non-nudity/non-sexual
Nudity/Sexual

just to name a few. The goal of a media producer is to provide for as many tastes as are interested. All the producers (with the exception of TickleHell) provide material that caters to all those tastes so far. TickleJapan is an exception, but their stuff isn't available over here (dammit!)

So I say relax...the best part about tickling media today is that you can order material according to your own tastes and leave out the rest. I think what you may be unhappy about is the INCREASE in sexual/nude tickling that is advertised...but the neutral tickling is not dead and gone; it's still there. It's just ebbs and flows of demand, and there'll always be what you want available to you.

 

[Mimi]

We do have both, Amn 🙂 Which is what makes the wonderful world of tickling media so great. As is obvious from this thread, there are MANY variations of preferences. I'm sure it's hard for media producers to even attempt to meet all those requests and demands.

Personally, I prefer my straight porn and tickling seperate. I'm usually in two totally different modes when it comes to each. Both sexual, yes, but on completely different wave lengths.

But that's not to say if they ever came out with a tickling video, with a female lee, who is having oral performed on her while being tickled absolutely senseless, I wouldn't be interested, either. 😉 😀

Mimi

 

[starfires]

Nudity != Pornography

This may be slightly off topic, but even if you get rid of nudity and orgasms, any tickling videos could still be considered pornographic.
By some definitions (including, I think, one used in the US penal code) most tickling videos produced so far -- nudity or no nudity, orgasms or no orgasms -- do qualify as pornography. What I remember of the gist of that definition is that pornography is anything intended to indulge the most basic emotions/instincts without any other educational or artistic value. In other words, if it's made with intent for people to watch it and get turned on, or get otherwise gratified by the imagery alone, it's porn.
I tend to agree with this definition. However, just because a tickling video is porn, you don't have to stick every single kind of porn in it. I personally prefer nudity just because clothes tend to get in the way, but I could take or leave the vibrating and clit feathering, unless it actually tickles.

 

[crydun]

I personally could do without the nudity. and the nudity in Jeff's ads are one of the main reasons why I rarely get on this site at home. I don't like it and it offends me. In addition, if my mother were to walk in and catch me on here just as some of Jeff's "ad" is downloading, I would be in a deep load of kazooooook. Yes, there are many aspects to tickling, but those images lead others to think that this site is something that it's not. When I'm browsing this site, I try to scroll down real fast so that I barely see the images up there. I wish that could be changed.🙁 Oh well, that's my thoughts anyway.

 

[10 armed tkler]

eh...

I mostly prefer just tickling without there top on. And women wearing a thong so you can get to that one spot. I don't really mind nutidy, just the vibrator part. i don't really like when videos have them in it. But hey!, as long as tickling and women laughing because the tickling is in it, Its all good with me.

 

[drew70]

Re: Nudity != Pornography

Originally posted by starfires

This may be slightly off topic, but even if you get rid of nudity and orgasms, any tickling videos could still be considered pornographic.
By some definitions (including, I think, one used in the US penal code) most tickling videos produced so far -- nudity or no nudity, orgasms or no orgasms -- do qualify as pornography. What I remember of the gist of that definition is that pornography is anything intended to indulge the most basic emotions/instincts without any other educational or artistic value. In other words, if it's made with intent for people to watch it and get turned on, or get otherwise gratified by the imagery alone, it's porn.

As weird is this sounds, it's essentially correct. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language defines pornography thus...

1. Sexually explicit pictures, writing, or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal.

2. The presentation or production of this material.

3. Lurid or sensational material: “Recent novels about the Holocaust have kept Hitler well offstage [so as] to avoid the pornography of the era” (Morris Dickstein).

According to this last definition pornography is anything that makes you react strongly, and may have nothing to do with nudity, sex, or eroticism. I prefer the first two definitions myself. In my experience, when people refer to "pornography" they are talking about material depicting erotocism, or at the very least, topless nudity. Hense the phrase, "soft porn."

I tend to agree with this definition.

Well, there's certainly documentation to back it up. Still, I hate the idea of a non-nude, non-erotic tickling video falling under the depraved category of "porn." There ought to be some kind of dividing line there. I have a friend who collects pictures of innocent tickling scenes that don't involve bondage or nudity. Believe it or not, she gets a lot of this material from Webshots. You'd have a hard time convincing people to regard this material as pornographic, but I'm sure there are lawyers out there who would try.

 

[Knox The Hatter]

I have always found this to be one of the most stultifying continuous arguments on this board. No matter how you slice it, if you're gonna sit there and watch and gratify yourself, then it's...well, someone's definition of pornography. Pornography is determined by local standards, and the local standards in the house where I am King Of The Castle is that pornography has a different definition 😀
Personally, I prefer watching girls get tickled with their clothes on. My favorite scenarios are impromptu, real life situations where, out of the clear blue sky, you wrestle your friend down on the carpeted floor or the couch, and happily poke and dig fingers into flesh, either covered or open. I guess I like this so much, since I've participated in scenarios like this for my whole life.
Please, though, stop with the "leave out the porn" garbage. Because, if you sit there, watching it, with the express intent of making endorphins explode in your head, then what the hell is it?

 

[The_Musician]

porn and tickling

Wow did I open a can of worms or whatlol lol.To each their own,I like the pure forum of tickling,and what I posted was a opinion.I like to mix sex and tickling with my wife,it's the only way I can tickle her a long time and get away with it.I do love to make love to her while she is giggling and squealing,neverdid the vibrator gig on her yet.

 

[drew70]

All I'm saying is that there should be a clear cut dividing line between what is porn and what isn't, and it should be decided by the majority. For example, if there is nudity, it's porn. If there is physical genital contact, it's porn. In my opinion, it's just not feasible to say that anything you watch that excites you is porn. For instance, what about that kiss between Madonna and Britney Spears? For some of us, that was pretty damned exciting. By some definitions, that would be porn. Some people get aroused by even G-rated love scenes between a man and a woman just kissing. Slap a porn-stamp on that one as well.

Consider the fetishists. We've already discussed tickling, but what about some of the others? You've got bare feet, pantyhose, rubber, even long fingernails. Just about every movie or TV show has something or someone in it that is going to arouse somebody. It's all porn, at least by some of the definitions presented in this thread. If that's true, then a scene of a pretty girl walking down the street in a business suit, pantyhose, and high heels is as depraved as a fisting scene. Pornography ought to be defined as "material which falls outside of that which is socially acceptable by the majority." It shouldn't be applied to all of the offshoots and quirks such as tickling, pantyhose, etc.

 

[crydun]

All I'm saying is that there should be a clear cut dividing line between what is porn and what isn't, and it should be decided by the majority. For example, if there is nudity, it's porn. If there is physical genital contact, it's porn. In my opinion, it's just not feasible to say that anything you watch that excites you is porn. For instance, what about that kiss between Madonna and Britney Spears? For some of us, that was pretty damned exciting. By some definitions, that would be porn. Some people get aroused by even G-rated love scenes between a man and a woman just kissing. Slap a porn-stamp on that one as well.

Consider the fetishists. We've already discussed tickling, but what about some of the others? You've got bare feet, pantyhose, rubber, even long fingernails. Just about every movie or TV show has something or someone in it that is going to arouse somebody. It's all porn, at least by some of the definitions presented in this thread. If that's true, then a scene of a pretty girl walking down the street in a business suit, pantyhose, and high heels is as depraved as a fisting scene. Pornography ought to be defined as "material which falls outside of that which is socially acceptable by the majority." It shouldn't be applied to all of the offshoots and quirks such as tickling, pantyhose, etc.

I agree wholeheartedly drew. A woman walking down the street as you described wouldn't offend me. A woman bent over the couch, naked, with her exposed rear in the air, would. I agree. A dividing line is necessary and common sense.

 

[BigBrownEyes]

Crydun, could you please define "a big load of Kazook? 😀

 

[crydun]

Crydun, could you please define "a big load of Kazook? 😀

LOL "deep crap!"

 

[ronlasvegas]

I am looking forward to the day when there is no porn in tickling and no tickling in porn and no tickling and no porn in videos.I also would like to see no videos in porn and no videos in tickling.....etc. etc. (LOL) To each his own What a Country!!!

Ronnie😎

 

[The Last Laugh]

Re: Nudity != Pornography

I hate the idea of a non-nude, non-erotic tickling video falling under the depraved category of "porn." There ought to be some kind of dividing line there.

Drew, I so totally agree with you. I realize that even my very down to earth videos can be considered somewhat adult in nature because, let's face it, they're basically meant for arousal. But if I thought for one second that I was actually producing porno, I would close shop immediately.

About the porn/nudity issue, I'll admit that I'm among those who prefer fully clothed tickling. I'm not interested in nudity when it comes to tickling material. I'm not even fond of skimpy outfits like lingerie or bikinis. However, I can't deny that there's a place for tickling videos of all kinds, with varying levels of adult content, from fully clothed to completely nude. I may not like them all myself, but as others have already said, tastes vary from one person to the other, and I think we should respect that.

Now, I'm not saying that I'll start producing videos that feature nudity so I can please everybody. It's simply not possible to please everybody. But that's ok, because as a group the various producers cater to a wide range tickling tastes. People are free to choose producers and videos that best suit their personal tastes. Ah, isn't it great to have a choice?

 

[Oddjob0226]

On one hand, I'm starting to see things Ronlasvagas' way.......

On th other, I do not like vanilla porn and find it boring. I like tickling fully clothed, and semi-clothed, and nude. I like tickling with just tickling, and tickling with some sexiness to it. Not always the same thing every time. Honestly, the 1st time I did ...*something* oral to a woman, it was becuased I was tickled into it and the only way to make it stop was to give in. But I don't want to do that EVERY time, either. One of the hottest photos I ever saw was of a woman in a business suit with only a shoe removed, and her foot being tickeld. But I've for sure seen a lot of videos I've really gotten into tha have had nudity in them. Why? I don't know. Where are all these non-tickling sites with genital tickling?

 

[Oddjob0226]

Re: Nudity != Pornography

By some definitions (including, I think, one used in the US penal code) most tickling videos produced so far -- nudity or no nudity, orgasms or no orgasms -- do qualify as pornography.

And as I recall, the Supreme Court has said in the past that nudity alone doesn't qualify as profanity, or obscenity, (and thus, pornography). No word on if you add tickling to it.