To tickle or not to tickle...

[JaneyD]

First of all how dumb was I not to put a poll on this thread.
http://www.ticklingforum.com/showthread.php?211797-Which-came-first

Secondly after counting your posts it would seem that we almost had a tie! However as this forum is the Tickling Media Forum, Tickle fetish people leads the Foot-people by 1.

The two really seem to compliment each other, which brings me to this...

To the Foot-people, if the feet of the "ticklee" isn't ticklish, does it automatically mean that they're not good enough for you?

And for the rest of you non-feet enthusiasts, if there is a certain body part that you love to tickle and your "lee" is just simply not ticklish there, would it just not be the same thing? Lets see how far our tickle-fetish fuels us.

Amazing insights on the previous thread btw! 🙂

* partner as in tickle-partner. Just a tickle-partner

 

[milagros317]

To the Foot-people, if the feet of the "ticklee" isn't ticklish, does it automatically mean that they're not good enough for you?

Short answer: No.

Long answer: If a play partner has feet that are not ticklish, then I will be glad to tickle her elsewhere when acting as the ler. I would want her to tickle me a lot, wherever she wants to, since I am about 90% lee, 10% ler.

I like play partners who are also into other things, such as bondage for its own sake. I won't further elaborate here, but anybody who is interested can read my nonfiction stories in my archive on the TMF.

 

[soletkler]

It absolutely would not mean that the person wouldn't be "good enough for me." The most important thing for me is if I find the person interesting before the tickling ever enters the conversation. Once that hurdle is crossed, as long as whomever I'm with is willing to embrace my fetish in one manner or another (lee or ler) I'll be happy. Having ticklish feet would be a plus, sure, but it isn't an out and out requirement.

 

[JaneyD]

It absolutely would not mean that the person wouldn't be "good enough for me." The most important thing for me is if I find the person interesting before the tickling ever enters the conversation. Once that hurdle is crossed, as long as whomever I'm with is willing to embrace my fetish in one manner or another (lee or ler) I'll be happy. Having ticklish feet would be a plus, sure, but it isn't an out and out requirement.

OH Situation is just controlled tickling, nothing GF BF thing or as in partner love what not... blah blah blah... 🙂) you get what I mean.

Uhmmm this is just a Tickle partner relationship

 

[TickleMyFancy]

At most, I might be disappointed. But it wouldn't change how I feel about them. If they're ticklish somewhere else, then awesome. If they're not ticklish anywhere...D:
I'm not sure, I've never come across that. It would suck though lol.

 

[BellybTickler]

I'm used to a female not being ticklish in and around her belly button, it's not a common place to be ticklish after all. However, it is by no means a deal breaker; my lee having a ticklish belly button is only a plus as far as my infatuation with bellies go. As for the tickling aspect, I'm more of a lee myself so it wouldn't bother me.

 

[PiedPiper]

For myself, tickling was definitely secondary to having a foot fetish. But, Aha! ... I learned from a very early age that tickling afforded the best "non-incriminating" way to at least touch a girl's feet - after all, it was a routine prank,.... though it also opened the door to further discussion, revelation, exploration, etc.

 

[Emishticklish]

I'd be a little disappointed truth be told, but I wouldn't deem them 'unworthy'. I can appreciate feet aside from tickling. And if by some chance my Girlfriend weren't ticklish there, I'd work around it. 🙂

 

[FLBowler]

I am disappointed, but i can tickle other areas, however if they are not ticklish at all, that is a tad bit harder to get through lol

 

[LD_Tickler]

There's no single part of the body that would have to be ticklish for me to want to tickle a girl. Now if she was only ticklish in a couple of random places, like she was only ticklish on her calves or something, then yeah, I probably wouldn't enjoy that.

 

[MrTicklefeet]

Not at all. If the feet aren't ticklish, I'm still happy with massaging and worshipping said feet.
Attached is this masseuses size 12 feet which are zero ticklish, but I still have quite the meditative time massaging, fondling, and worshipping those yummy feet.

 

[Inverse]

I'm not a foot person at all~ that said I really have a thing for upper body tickling and if she or he wasn't ticklish up there, but was on her feet it'd still be really fun. I'm really happy my love for tickling isn't isolated to any one body part. Though sometimes I wonder if tickling would be funner if I had a foot fetish because feet are so accessible, and it'd almost be like twice the enjoyment. :3

 

[JaneyD]

Awww at least there's still an alternative to satisfying your fetishes when one is absent. 🙁

 

[-Hari-]

To the Foot-people, if the feet of the "ticklee" isn't ticklish, does it automatically mean that they're not good enough for you?

Nah, my personal rule for a partner is that they're enjoyably ticklish, if the feet arnt included in that then thats not a big deal, my rule for feet is that I find them attractive.

Having said that, I do try to push for the whole lot tho and currently im beating the odds 😀

 

[JaneyD]

Nah, my personal rule for a partner is that they're enjoyably ticklish, if the feet arnt included in that then thats not a big deal, my rule for feet is that I find them attractive.

Having said that, I do try to push for the whole lot tho and currently im beating the odds 😀

Haha don't give up!

 

[luvgirlsfeet]

I like to tickle girls everywhere that she is ticklish if her feet are ticklish then thats great news for me then i will focus mainly there but explore other areas as well..IF her feet are not ticklish then i will tickle her elsewhere ie underarms bellybutton etc Granted i love womens feet but it's "not" my only option to tickle

 

[Em Es]

JaneyD

I'm a male tickler albeit not a foot fetish guy. Nonetheless, it's thrown me to start tickling a girl and, when I move down to her feet, learning she is not ticklish there. Tickling is tickling, but I can think of a number of good ticklings I administered where it left me not 100% satisfied because I could not tickle the woman's feet.

For all the attention feet get in the tickling community and considering how movie/T.V. tickling scenes play up feet, it's funny that the footies may disappoint a tickler. While I've tickled women who were vulnerable about the ribs and underms but not ticklish on their feet, I've never known one whose feet were ticklish but was not ticklish above the waist.

 

[Freethought]

I will echo the "disappointed, but not a deal-breaker" sentiment. I do enjoy tickling just for tickling's sake even if her feet are not responsive. But it is a turn off if the person is actually grossed out by feet or not into them at all. We are all different and I respect the "anti-foot" folks on the forum, but for me personally, a partner would have to enjoy some kind of foot play.