Dave2112
Level of Cherry Feather
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2001
- Messages
- 10,292
- Points
- 0
There was something brought up in one of the Reviews threads that caught my attention. I started to post a reply, but started feeling that this was such a good topic for open discussion that I decided to start a thread here.
Basically, it was argued that we all know the downside to the old Cal-Star, Vid-Tech and Harmony VHS tickling videos; Usually crappy bondage, a lot of less-than-ticklish girls, stupid dialog...etc. However, there were supporters of the old films and I tend to agree to a point.
In today's current market of on-demand, priced-to-own downloadable video clips, are we losing some of the inherant charm of the earlier films? Yes, the storylines were often dopey, but at least there were storylines. And cute/creative costumes, verbal interplay, teasing, anticipation...stuff like that. As one user pointed out, many of the clips today focus solely on the ticklishness of the girl herself. Many of them are extremely similar, with only a difference in actual model.
I tend to agree that many producers are bypassing one of the most important parts of the tickling fetish, second only to the tickling itself...the verbal interplay.
Also, remember that not all of the old Cal-Star et al films were bad. When they did get it right, they usually hit gold. I remember Ariel Cole in particular...anything she was in was good.
Now, before anyone gets me wrong, let me make clear that I'm not criticizing the current producers in any way. There is a wealth of fantastic tickling material out there thanks to them. And also, understand that producers that are making thier money on clips don't have a 30 or 60 minute film to work with. They have an average of about six minutes. Yes, there are longer flicks broken into smaller parts, but producers have to deal with the fact that a lot of people won't take the time to download massively large files. So, in those six minutes, you need to have a large amount of action with little time for anything else. Also, sadly, the shorter attention span of the tickling audience that was raised on clips rather than videos prevents many of the good models from achieving a recurring fan base. We all remember the actresses like Ariel, Ashley Renee, Tori Sinclair, Star Chandler...I think the last legitimate tickling-video "star" was Priscilla James.
So, again, I'm not saying the new stuff isn't good. I'm just saying that, for all of thier faults, the classic stuff was entertaining. Perhaps we could find a mix of the verbal/storyline approach and the superior bondage techniques our current producers are capable of.
This isn't a "one-or-the-other" debate, just a topic for conversation among those of us who remember the early stuff. And to ALL producers of tickling material, past and present, thanks guys!
Basically, it was argued that we all know the downside to the old Cal-Star, Vid-Tech and Harmony VHS tickling videos; Usually crappy bondage, a lot of less-than-ticklish girls, stupid dialog...etc. However, there were supporters of the old films and I tend to agree to a point.
In today's current market of on-demand, priced-to-own downloadable video clips, are we losing some of the inherant charm of the earlier films? Yes, the storylines were often dopey, but at least there were storylines. And cute/creative costumes, verbal interplay, teasing, anticipation...stuff like that. As one user pointed out, many of the clips today focus solely on the ticklishness of the girl herself. Many of them are extremely similar, with only a difference in actual model.
I tend to agree that many producers are bypassing one of the most important parts of the tickling fetish, second only to the tickling itself...the verbal interplay.
Also, remember that not all of the old Cal-Star et al films were bad. When they did get it right, they usually hit gold. I remember Ariel Cole in particular...anything she was in was good.
Now, before anyone gets me wrong, let me make clear that I'm not criticizing the current producers in any way. There is a wealth of fantastic tickling material out there thanks to them. And also, understand that producers that are making thier money on clips don't have a 30 or 60 minute film to work with. They have an average of about six minutes. Yes, there are longer flicks broken into smaller parts, but producers have to deal with the fact that a lot of people won't take the time to download massively large files. So, in those six minutes, you need to have a large amount of action with little time for anything else. Also, sadly, the shorter attention span of the tickling audience that was raised on clips rather than videos prevents many of the good models from achieving a recurring fan base. We all remember the actresses like Ariel, Ashley Renee, Tori Sinclair, Star Chandler...I think the last legitimate tickling-video "star" was Priscilla James.
So, again, I'm not saying the new stuff isn't good. I'm just saying that, for all of thier faults, the classic stuff was entertaining. Perhaps we could find a mix of the verbal/storyline approach and the superior bondage techniques our current producers are capable of.
This isn't a "one-or-the-other" debate, just a topic for conversation among those of us who remember the early stuff. And to ALL producers of tickling material, past and present, thanks guys!


. Although it did have a plot (albeit a very weak one), the acting, dialogue, and plot were all sub-porn; only one of the 'lees was ticklish--and she had a voice like minnie mouse on helium; none of the 'lers knew what they were doing, they just swept over the 'lees like they were dusting or somethin'; and the damn thing only lasted 30 mins.



