U.F.O. over the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem. Real, or elaborate hoax?

[Capnmad]

Seen several different angles on this. Here's one clip that synchronizes three pieces of footage.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuuTVLS6eVg

I've been considering criticisms of would-be debunkers, but can offer logical arguments against all their criticisms so far. What do you all think?

 

[miskiduk]

Just Elvis trying to get back in the limelight.
Don't take any notice, you'll only encourage him.

 

[Jagermeistered]

I'm gonna go with hoax.

 

[TropicThunder]

I'm always the skeptic, but COOOOOOL!!!

 

[Cavum]

Allways been fascinated by UFO's, and this video is very interesting! 🙂

 

[darkscar]

Could be hoax.

I highly doubt that in this entire universe we are the only planet with life, but i don't believe the stuff people come up with.

 

[paracarl44]

Did MUFON check this out?

 

[Jagermeistered]

It was a nice collaborate hoax though. I'll give them that. Three angles that were nicely planned; especially, how it conveniently showcased the videographers interpretation of "the event". A ball of light on top of a religious domicile; a lovely love story.

 

[Fastwalker]

One of those lights is hovering over my back yard right now... Oh wait... That's just swamp gas.

 

[Capnmad]

Seems to be at least a fourth video from a different, almost (but not quite) opposite angle, judging by lighting. Treating them all as equally valid, it seems that whereas in an earlier one the thing appeared to hover just over the Dome itself, it may have been simply the angle that made it appear so, while it in fact it was some distance from the Dome, and moving a bit horizontally.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDJXg8o8CMQ

One of the criticisms aired over one of the earlier clips was that for being so bright and directly over the Dome, it didn't shed light on the Dome. If it was in fact over and behind the Dome from that angle, that criticism is eliminated.