Unique Set Of Stocks (Note: Male Transvestite Images)

[Loves2Tickle]

Check out these stocks there simple 4 x 4 and 2 x 4 construction.

 

[CheshireCatNY]

................dude..................are those guys in drag? ROFL (not that theres anything wrong with that)

 

[chode]

Do you even have to ask if those are dudes in drag?!!!!!!!!!!?????? SERIOUSLY?!

Yeah, those are some creepy ass photos.

 

[Christopher Syn]

Nice Stocks...bad drag!

 

[Kalamos]

................dude..................are those guys in drag? ROFL (not that theres anything wrong with that)

Nothing wrong with drags themselves.
Quite wrong when you are expecting strawberry shake and it turns out it was tomato juice instead.

 

[Hahathna]

................dude..................are those guys in drag? ROFL (not that theres anything wrong with that)

Those are ingenious looking stocks.

And I'm not sure... but isn't the one in the black leather Margaret Thatcher (or Dame Edna... I confuse them quite a bit).

 

[duck171]

Cool stocks. Not cool man-gina!🙂

 

[Loves2Tickle]

I posted the photos to depict the unique characteristics and simplicity of construction. I apologize to the narrow minded members of this adult community that were offended at the sight of two fully clothed transvestites... Lovs

 

[Kalamos]

I posted the photos to depict the unique characteristics and simplicity of construction. I apologize to the narrow minded members of this adult community that were offended at the sight of two fully clothed transvestites... Lovs

Narrow minded?
Now, THAT is offensive.

There is nothing wrong with transvestites.
What is wrong is providing contents without proper labels.
Users should be able to CHOOSE.

As I said, when ordering a strawberry shake, one expects a strawberry shake.
Not tomato juice.
Not red paint.
Strawberry shake.
You effectively left a cup full of red paint, and waited for somebody to drink it, only to discover it WAS NOT juice or shake.

THAT is offensive. And mean.

 

[Duke Diablo]

I posted the photos to depict the unique characteristics and simplicity of construction. I apologize to the narrow minded members of this adult community that were offended at the sight of two fully clothed transvestites... Lovs

Mate... that was not the point. The point was you talking about stocks, true, but many people expected to see two women when they enlarged it. Personally, I really wanted to see girls more than stocks, and then BAM!

I mean, it's not that I'm offended by transvestites, but to me men are UGLY( with a capital U, G, L and Y), be they dressed as males or females. So, instead of something hot (i'm not saying beautiful because I can't rate a girl I don't know as beautiful... long story, and I'm not going to go into philosophy now, as it's not the time nor place), i find something that's quite opposite. Of course I was surprised... and not pleasantly at that. A gentle warning could be made, don't you think so, m8?

And yeah, well said, Kalamos.

 

[MistressValerie1]

Label added.

 

[Duke Diablo]

Label added.

Thank you, MistressValerie

 

[CheshireCatNY]

This is why I said "not that theres anything wrong with that"....hell I've done it myself!

"Mother, she's a nice girl mother, you'd like her!"

"She's a ***** Norman! She must die!"

"Yes mother...."

 

[Cybertickler]

I will be building these.

 

[alf1]

There is nothing wrong with transvestites.
What is wrong is providing contents without proper labels.
Users should be able to CHOOSE

right, it's funny how its sounds after few replies, labelled narrow minded right away, but it takes seconds to describe your clips properly & that's the major point.

thanx to the staff for not hurting my eyes 🙂

 

[Loves2Tickle]

I will be building these.

If only one member was inspired to build these stocks then the bullshit was worth it!... Lovs 😉