it is the presense of an armed populous that keep our government in check.
if you really think Joe Average and all of his "militia" buddies banding together with their Smith & Wessons can keep the Government from enforcing its will through the Police, National Guard, or (heaven forbid) the Armed Forces, I want to be there and watch the resulting conflict. Should be over faster than Afghanistan. Or Waco, even.
it is one of the checks, and balances that our founding fathers had the forsight to put into the constitution.
enacted during a time when the national guard/armed forces WERE the regular populace. the reason for such an amendment is long gone. it's good to have, but it's far from the lynchpin that holds our society together.
...and if you want to get picky, the only official set of checks and balances spelled out by the constitution are those in place for the three branches of government (executive, legislative, judicial).
the right of the people to keep arms is what keeps the government from taking away our other rights.
see paragraph 1. I'm quite sure if the government decided to deploy the Seals or Rangers in your neighborhood, all the guns in the world aren't going to help you.
I'm all for the right to bear arms, but the arguments most people use to trumpet its benefits are HIGHLY flawed.




