• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Virginia Tech Shooting

What I make of this:

Okay let me see if I can get the incident all clear in my mind and all down here in this forum.

Before the incident:
Whoever allowed that this person should not be reported to the proper authorities should be fired. He should have been put on a do not sell guns to maniacs list and no one would have died, the situation wouldn't have happened, and he also could still be alive. 33 live.

At the time of the incident:
The cops may be to blame partly. I don't know the exact minute by minute run down of how this all played out, BUT if the SWAT team was there before the last person was shot were they going in and shooting this guy down? If the SWAT team has on protective gear (more or less)(and their job is to get shot at sometimes) and they didn't do much of anything, then they made the 2nd mistake in this whole debacle or whoever their commanding officer who told them not to go in made the mistake and should be fired. Some of the 33 could have lived (maybe who knows).

The president of the school and the college itself did as much as it could from what I have heard. I have attended a school half the size, but still very large and wide open and this could happen and be no one's fault. At least no one associated with the school. However, I did hear an idea from my father who heard the idea on the radio. Why did they send an email to students at 8am in the morning? Don't they know that 7/10 college students are either A) still in bed at that hour, or B) to sleepy to be checking their emails? I know that myself nor any of my roommates at the college never got up and checked our emails that early in the morning. By noon maybe, but at 8am? Almost never. The idea was this: someone should have gotten a truck with a loudspeaker attached to it and drove around the campus blaring a message. Some of the 33 could have lived, maybe.

Of course I know that this all happened in 2 hours. What seems like a long time to us, did not feel like a long time to the people on scene I'm quite sure. Only the people in Norris Hall felt the real length of time. The bureaucracy of the college was scrambling to figure out wtf was going on I'm also sure. You'd be surprised at how fast 2 hours goes by when you are busy. And did they know this guy was coming to Norris Hall? I can imagine him going to the PO after (probably) shooting those other 2 people, and then walking across campus with his guns in his backpack. He would have looked like any other student and so no one would have picked him out of a crowd. The flak jacket would have been maybe a little odd, but on a college campus meh.

What I also want to examine is the people who were shot at. I am thinking that the first room he went into had no chance in hell of knowing what was about to happen, BUT how long was the time in between that first classroom and the other 2(?) rooms. Did they not have at least a good minute or two to think this over? I don't know how I would have reacted, but I think one thing I might have done was stand at the door with a chair in my hand. When he came walking into my room I'd have at least made an effort to crack his skull with it. He shoots me, oops, I missed, but if I hit him well...20 lives (?) saved. Again who the heck knows how I would have reacted, but I'm amazed at how at least 50 people just cowered under their desks. If he's already shot some people and you know this why are you thinking he won't shoot you or see you for that matter? Remember Columbine and how those 2 maniacs took people out?
I was glad to see that some people didn't lose their heads and at least tried to save others before themselves. Terrible thing that they lost their lives anyway.

Now, in the aftermath:
Wtf is up with all this let's not hate Koreans? Who the heck would be so dumb as to hate an entire group of people because of some guy who really wasn't even associated with them anymore (not since 1992?) If anyone would've been hated, to me, it would have been the family or people who up to that moment could have stopped him. The family if they had abused him somehow or some other person maybe. And the person responsible for reporting this guy to the proper authorities as I stated above.

Then we heard from the family and it's like well okay we're sorry for them because they had no idea that their son was crazy.

(Yes, I believe that the only thing that saves this guy in my book was that he must have been crazy. And to me crazy, true crazy does kinda excuse any crimes committed under that skewed mental system. It doesn't make this tragedy any easier to bear though).

And the president of the US has to make a I feel sorry for you guys speech. I'm sorry, but he's more worried about Iraq right now. Real empathy comes from us not him. Anyway...

And then we get this whole legislative ball rolling again because of something like this and it's a damned hard line for the legislators to walk. On the one hand it is absolutely true in my mind that no one who is or has ever suffered from a mental illness should be allowed to own a gun, BUT I think it's okay for someone who is not mentally ill to have a gun for their own safety especially if they live in a high crime area. As someone once put it, the police are going to be here in 5 min. and the criminal is going to kill my ass now, uh yeah I think I'll have the gun in my hand. So you see, this ball that we have rolling again is a waste of time because there are bigger issues and so many people have so many ideas about it.

Issues that have a more definable answer, such as global warming, should be getting addressed IMO.

And I'm so terribly sorry this happened. I don't want to sound like I think the people shot should have done more, but it sucks that if 5 had rushed him 27 might have lived. What if is the worst question.

This reply is solely my opinions and thoughts about this event. I am not talking in certainties here and I mean no disrespect to anyone if a Minnesotan fails to comprehend something. I would be glad to be enlightened.

It just saddens me that this happend and then it angers me that after the fact we have to play this fucking politics bullshit and try to find a scapegoat because the guy who did the crime killed himself. Damn the media. They do all right with the weather (sometimes), sports, and a few other things, but when something like this happens, they get all up in arms and make a loud announcement about it. The best thing would be to quietly figure out what happened, why did it happen, can we keep it from happening again? If so, fix it and move on. If common sense would just be used and not political haggling.

Okay I think I'm done.
 
Midnight Circus is just baiting everyone for the sake of a reaction and you're giving it to him. He's already pointed out the futility in posting a bunch of feel good stuff in a forum that not many will ever see. So be it. That's actually true. It's still nice to see some supportive comments and everyone here is entitled to that. Unfortunately, he's also entitled to come in and try to rock the boat for no reason whatsoever. I suggest you stop splitting hairs with him and trying to win a debate. It's obvious he's goating people and as silly and ignorant as it is, he's entitled to his opinion of what a "victim" the killer is. Ted Bundy confessed to raping and killing 30+ people... I wonder if he, too, is a victim by MC's standards. He was caught and executed and didn't kill himself, but his mother still lost a son. Poor Mrs. Bundy. But given the chance here, I'm sure MC will compliment Bundy on his sexual stamina.

Since we're all entitled to our opinion, here's mine: he's incredibly tacky and in poor taste. So what? Remember, he's in a forum that not alot of people see. And although I maintain he's just looking for attention, if he actually thinks this way, God forbid he ever end up on a jury where the outcome actually matters. My favorite part of all this is that he's turning it around trying to make you all sound like the ones who need to grow up and open your minds.

Having said that, I myself don't post in threads like this, but I certainly see no harm in them.
 
Last edited:
My opionion remains unchanged. Once more, i pray for all whom were lost. I apologise if my defending myself upset anyone, i get annoyed when i see such...ug, nevermind. God bless.
-Joe
 
Yeah, well, I just happen to have those little things called "sympathy" and "understanding"--and, apparently, so do the students at Virginia Tech. That should tell people something.

Good for you - but not helping anyone! Look this thread - is a mess. Nothing will be solved because nobody will agree.
 
Y'know, back in my father's day, there wasn't even an option to bring a gun to a school.

people knew that shit wouldn't solve nothing.

If you had a problem, you guys hit the football field and throw some fists.

What happened, and why isn't that allowed anymore?

I'm talkin, put some boxing gloves on some kids, let 'em duke it out, and leave it at that, the next day, your best friends.
 
So the authors of the U.S. Constitution didn't understand what it was like to live in dangerous, unstable times? Surely we know what they really meant better than they did. Never before have innocent citizens been in danger from people with guns!.

That is not what I am saying. They probably did very well know what it was like to live in those times. What I am saying is that times have changed. So much that the Constitiutional right to own a gun is doing more damage than good these days. Furthermore guns are dangerous. If someone has a gun all of us are in danger wether it be a person directing a gun straight at you or you are caught in crossfire you are still getting hurt or be killed. Guns are dangerous to any one when someone has it. Unless you have invented bullets that miss innocent people.

[/QUOTE]I think if you check over my posts you'll find I haven't whined a bit about this tragedy. I'm in the camp that is not shocked. I definitely don't think Cho should have been allowed to purchase a gun, but I also don't think it should be illegal to own one. I could reference another famous controversial figure, Bernhard Goetz, whose actions filled many with courage and were seen as the triumph of an underdog. By some....[/QUOTE]

OK so that last bit in my post was not to be directed at you in person and I appologies if I offended you with that. But the point I was trying to make is that I really hope that people are going to understand that guns are dangerous and should not able to be possed by everyone. These things can kill. You said in your previous post that owning a gun is legal so why someone owns one is none of our business. How can you say that when it concerns such a dangerous device. It's excactly this attitude that made it possible for Cho to do his deeds. If someone did know why he was purchasing the gun it could have been prevented. Furthermore I did not say it should be illegal to own a gun. What I said was that I think not everybody should be able to own one because the things are dangerous.

BTW I live in Holland so I am not that familiar with (American) history. So I have no clue who Goetz is 😉.

[/QUOTE]By jove, I think he's got it! How can anyone promise justice? To do so is a lie. An accused criminal is promised a trial by a jury of peers, and a victim is promised some level of representation by the government. How could anyone guarantee that every innocent victim will see justice and every law-breaker will be apprehended and dealt with fairly? It's nice to have some attempt, but only a totalitarian government could realize such a promise. Justice is a feeling, nothing more. Reality is ruthless.[/QUOTE]

A jury of his peers? oh you mean that jury that has no idea of law whatsoever and still decide if a person is guilty or not. Everyday people that listen to the fast-talking lawyers and make a decision based on that. It are the persons with the most charistmatic lawyer who wins the trails not the person that is guilty or not. Fair judicial system you have
 
I'm sure MC will compliment Bundy on his sexual stamina.
He was truly a lady's man for the ages.

Since we're all entitled to our opinion, here's mine: he's incredibly tacky and in poor taste. So what? Remember, he's in a forum that not alot of people see. And although I maintain he's just looking for attention, if he actually thinks this way, God forbid he ever end up on a jury where the outcome actually matters.
Right. God forbid we uphold the ideals of our US Constitution, where everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty--or is shown any sort of leniency when presented with evidence of their mental infirmity. You're right, what a monster I am. Damn me and my humanity.

My favorite part of all this is that he's turning it around trying to make you all sound like the ones who need to grow up and open your minds.
I again point out that even the Virginia Tech students have erected a memorial to Cho, yet you people still want him to burn forever in the eternal and merciless fires of hell. How, then, can you possibly make the argument that you are anything BUT closed-minded?

Having said that, I myself don't post in threads like this, but I certainly see no harm in them.
Yes, you certainly don't post in threads like this. Not even right now. I must be responding to nothing.
 
Wow, Cho killed people, crazy or not, he killed people. By most of the religions I've looked into, well those that have some sort of hell, that is where he is. I do feel bad for Cho, that he was allowed to slip through the cracks. I hope that Virginia Tech has erected the memorial because of that. I still don't think it's alright that he did it. Cho went through what many people have gone through in our school system, he was picked on and ridiculed for being different.

I can't immediately condemn him, he was mentally unstable, so first I would need to find out what opportunities he as given. If he was taken to see shrinks and didn't respond to them, if he was offered any kind of help but decided to hole up in his own mind...then it's pretty much all his fault. He compared himself to jesus, I'm sure teh holocaust survivor was torturing him and keeping him down, I'm sure all of those students he killed were. Oh wait, sarcasm can be hard to read.

He fell through, it's a sad sad thing, but it's not something that can just be forgotten about and let go of. I haven't even heard of when he was issued a gun, but he shouldn't have had it. He should have gone to people for help. And on the same token, somebody should have seen his issues and gone to him.
 
By most of the religions I've looked into, well those that have some sort of hell, that is where he is.

Obviously, you know very little about those religions, as most religions make exceptions for those who are mentally ill (especially Christianity). But, hey, from the way most on here have responded to me, I don't expect most of you to comprehend half of what you read on wikipedia. So I suppose I shouldn't be surprised.
 
Hmm...by wikipedia you mean, not wikipedia. Christianity has made exceptions for the mentally ill, mostly a case by case basis unless that has changed. Not all christians abide by this practice either, in the end man can still fail where God can not. But hey, since the Pope said it's cool God's gotta abide, no? I made a broad spectrum remark. I tend to go for the original teachings and scripture, I feel they have a better representation of most religions. Christianity changes about once a week due to interprutations so it can stay alive in a changing world.

I'll leave this little comment I read in another forum, "Emo's are actually happier people because they know what real pain is." I won't leave it up to you to figure out how to relate this. Basically, through your absolute lack of faith in humanity you have taken it upon yourself to be the self-righteous one, the learned one. Obviously we cannot comprehend your higher thinking capacity. Quick question, since I do not know your age, if you had a child and Cho had killed them, how would you feel? (I'm basically expecting a sympattic forgiving response, just thought I'd toss it out)

To the mods, is it possible to seperate the petty squabbling out into a different thread so this one can return to what it was meant for?
 
Wow, Cho killed people, crazy or not, he killed people. By most of the religions I've looked into, well those that have some sort of hell, that is where he is. I do feel bad for Cho, that he was allowed to slip through the cracks. I hope that Virginia Tech has erected the memorial because of that. I still don't think it's alright that he did it. Cho went through what many people have gone through in our school system, he was picked on and ridiculed for being different.
Of course it's not all right that he did it. I haven't come across anyone saying it is. The question is whether passing judgment on people in black and white is useful for making the world a better place. Good guys and bad guys belong in Hollywood blockbusters, not reality.
It DOESN'T MATTER whether you "forgive" or "sympathize with" someone like that. What good does it do anyone for you to forgive or sympathize with them, when you're just going to go about your business like every other day? Better to "understand", not in the sense that you "understand" someone's sorrow, but in the sense that you "understand" the behavior of a moth flying around a street light. He should have done this, he should have done that, but guess what, he did what he did, and it seems to me his actions immediately qualify him as mentally diseased, no questions necessary. Furthermore, while the event saddens me, I can't understand how anyone is shocked by it.

I can't immediately condemn him, he was mentally unstable, so first I would need to find out what opportunities he as given. If he was taken to see shrinks and didn't respond to them, if he was offered any kind of help but decided to hole up in his own mind...then it's pretty much all his fault. He compared himself to jesus, I'm sure teh holocaust survivor was torturing him and keeping him down, I'm sure all of those students he killed were. Oh wait, sarcasm can be hard to read.
Every single student or teacher Cho killed was a selfless, smiling ball of talented joy with nothing but kind words for every bum on every corner, only breaking from their studies to help old ladies across streets or to volunteer for Big Brothers, Big Sisters. Every one of them prayed for Cho every night, twice a night, and left little chocolates on his doorstep when he least expected it.
 
Once again, this is a reminder to all to observe the "be polite" rule. It's OK to attack ideas, but not OK to attack one's fellow members.
 
Yeah, this thread disgrace. Now I also angry!! Shameful you all are!!! Behave!
 
I think everyone is a victim here....only difference is this victim (the shooter) had options and choices in the matter, and the others did not...which is something he'll have to give accounts for before the throne of judgement. I think whats important is for us to not pass judgement on anyone, as only the Lord can do that, and rather than looking to blame everyone we can for how this went wrong, those affected by this tragedy should focus on healing, forgiveness, and moving on and those pointing fingers should focus on helping that healing rather than creating division and using this horrible incident with some sort of angle in mind.

The worst thing any victim can do is bottle the issue up inside and allow hatred to brood in their hearts. Its human nature to despise something or someone that takes something precious from you, especially when that someone leaves this earth as well, and you have no way of punishing them or seeing to it that they be punished. They completely cheat you of and deny you justice. Remember, though, that our Lord is the Just Judge, and He will sort this incident and them (the victims and the shooter) all out. Even if the killer didn't commit suicide, and he was tried, convicted, and sentenced, no earthly judgement or fate would ever be good enough for any human mind. The ultimate justice is performed by our Lord in the afterlife. This, however, should not cause people to be gleeful. It's not something to be happy about or glee over or to take some sort of consolation in. This is all extremely unfortunate and having a desire for bloodlust and revenge is not what God wants for us or for us to focus on as it takes us away from the point and objective. Leave matters of the state of the soul up to Him, and focus on the earthly tasks at hand.

What we earth dwellers have to do is learn from this, and heal. I know it's a tall order to fulfill, but it's something that must happen for people to truely recover. One thing tragedy often does is make people more spiritual, and it awakens spirituality within them. For those whom this is true of this incident, I would hope they put that newfound or renewed faith or sprituality to good use and to put into the service of others. Healing comes in many, many forms, and oftentimes its when you don't become introverted and focus on yourself, but rather on others, that you find peace.
 
Last edited:
One thing tragedy often does is make people more spiritual, and it awakens spirituality within them.
Or drives them to drugs.

Healing comes in many, many forms, and oftentimes its when you don't become introverted and focus on yourself, but rather on others, that you find peace.
Well said. One of the best responses I've seen.
 
I think we're probably forgetting the reason as to why we were reading this thread in the first place.
People lost lives - including Cho who was bullied from his youth.
As a "community" shouldnt we respect each others views? The idea of a "war" seems very disrespectfull towards victims to me.
Basically - stop bloody arguing girls.
 
Adam, and MC, please do not use this thread to air out your personal disputes. Those posts have been deleted in an effort to keep the thread on-topic.
 
that is a horrible tragedy and im sorry that had to happen but i feel like america took it too far by playing it on the news for the 2 weeks non stop
 
What's New
9/11/25
In Memory.

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1704 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top