into bondage first

[bclark]

Was anyone here like me, & who was into bondage first? One day I was searching the internet for bondage pics, when I stumbled across some tickle pics & I instantly fell in love with tickling right then and their. Anyone else has a similar experience where their loves for bondage lead to their love for tickling.

 

[seanwoj]

Yes. I was. But now I prefer a little bit of both. If your into that as well, check out the bondage channel site.

I did, its good stuff.

 

[tkldan]

I started with bondage (a girlfriend), but it was missing something...then I "stumbled" onto tickling. It's been love ever since.

 

[TicklesFemales]

For me it was the other way around, my love for tickling led me to the love for bondaqe when I tickled a ticklish lady.

 

[Exile]

I was fascinated with tickling from a very young age on.
Then at the age of sixteen I accidentally stumbled on some scans
of classic tickling magazines from back in the day and my life has never
been the same since.

 

[LowBass]

Bondage is my first love, then feet, then tickling. So, yes, I was a bondage fan first!

 

[English]

Tickling came first for me but I knew I liked the idea of tying girls up and tickling them before I was even old enough to know it was called bondage!

 

[TangerineTicklee]

Well, as a 'lee, I'm only into the idea of seeing myself - but others as well, and never being the 'ler myself, never (that's just me, folks) - being within bondage, only for tickling. No pain. Pain absolutely is not my thing. Just tickling.

I was into tickling first and then that stemmed into bondage, but only along with tickling. I personally think it would be pointless for there to be bondage without tickling. For me, as the 'lee, I believe it would be completely aimless to simply be tied up without anything happening and/or there being pain. Again, for me, bondage is only for the super ticklish, who cannot stay still. Without the tickling, I really don't see a point in it. But that's just me.

 

[mitmania]

Ive actually got into later

 

[Adam]

I was also the other way around, with tickling coming first. But I sure am glad I discovered bondage.

 

[English]

Well, as a 'lee, I'm only into the idea of seeing myself - but others as well, and never being the 'ler myself, never (that's just me, folks) - being within bondage, only for tickling. No pain. Pain absolutely is not my thing. Just tickling.

I was into tickling first and then that stemmed into bondage, but only along with tickling. I personally think it would be pointless for there to be bondage without tickling. For me, as the 'lee, I believe it would be completely aimless to simply be tied up without anything happening and/or there being pain. Again, for me, bondage is only for the super ticklish, who cannot stay still. Without the tickling, I really don't see a point in it. But that's just me.

Apart from tickling, bondage doesn't always have to be about pain, it can involve pleasure too!

 

[TangerineTicklee]

Apart from tickling, bondage doesn't always have to be about pain, it can involve pleasure too!

Of course.

 

[stockoption]

For me, bondage and tickling go hand and hand. Although tickling came first because I was young, the tying up part was there without a name. I agree with you, English!

 

[DamselAdmirer]

Bondage is my first love, then feet, then tickling. So, yes, I was a bondage fan first!

That matches up with my tastes.

 

[Brett77]

Yup, I was into bondage, until one of my favorite bondage sites tickled a girl in one of their videos. I don't think I've been back to the site ever since.