New Porn Laws In UK

[P4E]

I had brought up a point in another thread about how TwistedSmile.com, and some other websites, went offline almost immediately after 18 U.S.C. 2257 was expanded upon. The vague legalese made producers and models alike afraid of their personal info being released to anyone who asked, so they shut down to prevent as much fallout as possible. Other sites vanished, or were restructured, due to the DOJ's anti-obscenity initiative during the Bush administration (basically, the FBI was tasked to go witch hunting).

What I would like to see are countries like the U.S. and England putting those resources into finding child porn and slave trafficking organizations, rather than attacking those that follow the letter of the law. And I'm sure some people would say "Well, they're already doing that!". True, but not to the same, or even more extreme, extent. Why go after criminals that can hide in plain sight when it's far easier (and maybe more profitable) to hit the people that are visible?

I agree...when it comes to children being endangered I'm ashamed at the UK's lax legislation. Shameful. And they try to say they're taking action...what a load of codswallop.

 

[turtleboy]

Hey Dave, yeah man I tried to buy 2 clips, one from you and one from Tommy (Tickle Abuse), and my card was declined. As my credit card has expired and I cannot find the replacement (left it in my lounge and it's gone AWOL :/ ), I have to order a replacement purely for this purpose.

Tbh D, I see it as the same, as an attempt to force the industry from the UK...However, how many MP's and high level so-called Politicians will we see uncovered with a mass of porn on their computers? The ball is rolling with our MP's and it'll keep on rolling. I for one hope they're bought to justice. But sadly, we know they won't...as is the way with Politics especially with Tories, they get away with everything.

I was talking to a model about this just the other day. The Conservatives don't exactly have a great track record when it comes to 'sleazy' behaviour (neither do Labour MPs for that matter), so there's something ironic about them adopting this tough stance on porn.

P.S. Dave, I want to send you a tenner for a drink as an Xmas pressie bud and as a small token of thanks for your fantastic work, you got a paypal or anything? I'd come and give you cash but you're too bloody far lol.

Thanks my friend - that's a great gesture but don't trouble yourself! If you continue supporting the site in 2015 then that'll be more than thanks enough!

 

[meangry]

There's going to be mixed feelings on this but I'm not really bothered by this regulation. If anything I think it'll help mitigate some of the wild stuff out there that probably needs to be swept under the rug more than it currently is now. Not that I have kids currently, but if I did... I wouldn't want them necessarily exposed to some of the radical stuff out there today, which I'm sure is part of the intent of the law. I'm not privy to every single detail about it, but it's my understanding that is the intention of the law. It wouldn't even really impact UK Tickling since he keeps his material tasteful. I think it's a little aggressive on the UK's part for regulating something like this, but its sending a message that I'd imagine may not be popular for some.

Guess what, bro? You make fetish videos on the internet that people jack off to. The level of disconnect you always show is absolutely hilarious. Not like you make money on wholesome entertainment.

 

[TL88]

The bit that annoys me the most is female ejaculation being banned. That's just what happens to some women during sex! It's completely repressive.

 

[cloudgazer2k]

The bit that annoys me the most is female ejaculation being banned. That's just what happens to some women during sex! It's completely repressive.

I agree. It's funny how (correct me if I'm wrong) making a woman squirt has become a popular thing nowadays when it comes to porn, but a bunch of guys in Parliament aren't kosher with that. "Nooo! Only the dudes can squirt! Women ejaculating is ooey!". This, coming from a country that was (at one point or another) ranked #1 in kinkiness levels.

 

[Amnesiac]

Betcha that 1st Amendment of ours is lookin' pretty good to all you Brits now, eh?

 

[Amnesiac]

That is a very blind response.

Hmmm...I woulda thought it was more bald-faced than blind. It's got that right amount of impish chutzpah to be deliberate with just that smidge of rueful truth to be significant. I was originally gonna go with "If Britain had only adopted the First Amendment, none of this would have happened" but the reference was too obscure.

 

[kopfhorer]

I'd roughly equate these new regulations with the abstinence-only sex "education" found in some American localities.

 

[cloudgazer2k]

I'd roughly equate these new regulations with the abstinence-only sex "education" found in some American localities.

Pretty much. I'm curious to see how things pan out.

 

[Amnesiac]

Pretty much. I'm curious to see how things pan out.

You can see it already. It looks something like this:

 

[DontAskJusTckle]

I'd roughly equate these new regulations with the abstinence-only sex "education" found in some American localities.

That's a pretty rough equation indeed, given that one is for school children and the other is for adults.

 

[turtleboy]

It's got that right amount of impish chutzpah to be deliberate with just that smidge of rueful truth to be significant.

That's one hell of a sentence!

 

[Jelly Bean]

The entire thing is ridiculous. But the one that annoys me is the banning of female ejeculation. It's like they are saying male ejeculation is fine but female isn't. Though none of the things listed should be banned.

 

[jujimbo]

The entire thing is ridiculous. But the one that annoys me is the banning of female ejeculation. It's like they are saying male ejeculation is fine but female isn't. Though none of the things listed should be banned.

Vaguely reminds me of this South Park episode lol:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEl0XlbEbW8

 

[MrMacphisto]

That's a pretty rough equation indeed, given that one is for school children and the other is for adults.

Agreed.

 

[AcidBurn69]

I guess these new porn laws don't apply to 'free porn sites' like youporn, 4tube, h2porn,...?

 

[CyrusHolderman]

These laws will not apply to any free porn sites like youporn, gayreign or pornhub because they very big sites and they can't apply any pressure to lock the content.